It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
lazydog: gotta love invalid questions, they are the best kind.
So, why is this question invalid?

(Note: This post is not serious, unlike most of the other posts in this thread.)
avatar
lazydog: gotta love invalid questions, they are the best kind.
avatar
dtgreene: So, why is this question invalid?

(Note: This post is not serious, unlike most of the other posts in this thread.)
You may want to seriously ask yourself:

(Basically, if you ask why X is true, and X actually isn't true, the question is invalid.)
Getting back on this thread made me fail all my sanity checks, Nyarlathotep is among us.
Oh shit, Algebra.
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: So, why is this question invalid?

(Note: This post is not serious, unlike most of the other posts in this thread.)
avatar
lazydog: You may want to seriously ask yourself:

(Basically, if you ask why X is true, and X actually isn't true, the question is invalid.)
You missed the joke in my post.

If the question I just posted is invalid, then it is now asking why it's invalid, which is in turn valid.

If the question I just posted is valid, then it is asking why it's invalid, but it isn't invalid, so it is, indeed, invalid.

If your head is spinning now, that's normal.

(Wondering when, or if, this thread will escape this tangent.)
avatar
lazydog: You may want to seriously ask yourself:

(Basically, if you ask why X is true, and X actually isn't true, the question is invalid.)
avatar
dtgreene: You missed the joke in my post.

If the question I just posted is invalid, then it is now asking why it's invalid, which is in turn valid.

If the question I just posted is valid, then it is asking why it's invalid, but it isn't invalid, so it is, indeed, invalid.

If your head is spinning now, that's normal.

(Wondering when, or if, this thread will escape this tangent.)
You may want to ask yourself when a question is invalid, try invoking some of that bullshit logic you have gained from god knows where.

Try looking at the link I posted too, you might just laugh at the whole thing.
avatar
tinyE: Oh shit, Algebra.
You choose to use the word "shit" to swear.

You mentioned mathematics.

This post validity is 100% accurate.
avatar
dtgreene: 4. Feminists are not, by definition, "ugly". There are, in fact, feminists who are quite beautiful; just like there are non-feminists that are. (Also, this is insulting to feminists.)
avatar
Dalthnock: Oof...

Ah, well... I've had a good run. We all gotta go eventually. Might as well go out in a bang.

*Ahem*

I'm sorry to disagree with you, but there isn't one single feminist who is "beautiful". Even if their outward appearance is otherwise appealing, the blackness of their souls engulfs & renders them as horrendous creatures of the foulest pits of hell to each & every one of the other four senses. Yes, taste included.

(Also, feminists are insulting to everyone else.)
As a non-feminist aka not-a-white-knight type. I think you're confusing feminists with the more extremist "Rad fems" & feminazis (granted it can be confusing as they fly the feminist flag)

It's the same as Muslims. Not all are jihadists & Islamists.

I'm not really a fan of either ideology but let's not throw out the duped & misinformed with the hateful.
avatar
Trilarion: I think this is wrong. Instead we need more respect. Being transgender is not better or worse than being anything else. If only we publicly make this opinion heard than any outing won't be a big problem at all.
avatar
Jonesy89: Unfortunately, we tried that here in the states with regards to racism. While overtly racist laws are gone, racism is still very much alive and well here in the states.
with Social Justice types acting like "Jim Crow" is the future they choose, racism can only get worse.
avatar
RWarehall: Dtgreene, David Reimer proves nothing. This has been gone over before. This is a case where someone who was born male, was lied to and brought up as female, but as biological changes kicked in, he realized he was born a boy and lied to all along. In this case, all it shows is biological sex is very important and in many ways disproves your point.

And frankly, who the hell do you think YOU are to tell parents what they can an can't do with their child? Notice how you choose not to address the fact that people grow out of these feelings, like the post Gnostic linked which talks about a woman did not fit in with the "girl" click but learned it was the not fitting in which was the problem and not that she wasn't a girl, or the trans friend who told her how he regretted undergoing a change. How you continue to claim that young children somehow have these rights over their parents is beyond me...
avatar
dtgreene: (First, my username starts with a lowercase letter. Mentioning this first only because it's the first word (not counting the quoted section) in your post.)

David Reimer does prove that forcing the wrong gender identity on a child can lead to disaster. The fact that he was cisgender is beside the point, actually; if he were a trans man who was raised as a girl, there would be similar issues.

If you want a specific case involving a transgender person, just look at Leelah Alcorn, a trans girl who committed suicide as a result of parents forcing her into a male role to the point of being abusive.

The suicide rate is staggeringly common among trans people; it's 41%. Yes, *forty-one* percent. That is *really* high. (Note that the rate decreases *significantly* after hormone treatment and surgery.)
The best way to tell a lie is to tell the truth, carefully constructed truth with other truth dismissed.

I go and find out how you get the numbers and the study say "LIFETIME SUICIDE ATTEMPTS"

Contrast that to suicide rate of men "YEARLY" it is 20.7% now
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db241.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click#fig2

It will take TWO YEARS for men suicide to catch up with what transgender takes a lifetime.

Now it put things into perspective right?

If some other post you are flaunting transgender homicide as a historical high. It is a total of 21 in year 2015
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/nov/13/transgender-homicide-victims-us-has-hit-historic-high
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

With a population of 318.9M and a transgender of 0.3% you have 956700 transgender. 21/956700 = 0.0022% homicide

According to the FBI the total manslaughter per 100000 people is 13483,that is 13.483%
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-16/table_16_rate_by_population_group_2013.xls

Now it put things into perspective right?

Activist like to spike the numbers for their means, but doing that too many time make me wise up and start to ask questions.


Edit: Missed out the link to how the study of 41% transgender suicide is taken
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/AFSP-Williams-Suicide-Report-Final.pdf
Post edited May 29, 2016 by Gnostic
low rated
avatar
Gnostic: The best way to tell a lie is to tell the truth, carefully constructed truth with other truth dismissed.

I go and find out how you get the numbers and the study say "LIFETIME SUICIDE ATTEMPTS"

Contrast that to suicide rate of men "YEARLY" it is 20.7% now
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db241.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click#fig2

It will take TWO YEARS for men suicide to catch up with what transgender takes a lifetime.

Now it put things into perspective right?
You are mis-reading that study. The yearly suicide rate of men isn't 20.7% (20.7 per 100); it's 20.7 per 100,000, or .00207%, or 4 magnitudes lower than what you were treating it. Therefore, the comparison isn't valid because you got the units wrong.
avatar
Gnostic: The best way to tell a lie is to tell the truth, carefully constructed truth with other truth dismissed.

I go and find out how you get the numbers and the study say "LIFETIME SUICIDE ATTEMPTS"

Contrast that to suicide rate of men "YEARLY" it is 20.7% now
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db241.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click#fig2

It will take TWO YEARS for men suicide to catch up with what transgender takes a lifetime.

Now it put things into perspective right?

If some other post you are flaunting transgender homicide as a historical high. It is a total of 21 in year 2015
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/nov/13/transgender-homicide-victims-us-has-hit-historic-high
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

With a population of 318.9M and a transgender of 0.3% you have 956700 transgender. 21/956700 = 0.0022% homicide

According to the FBI the total manslaughter per 100000 people is 13483,that is 13.483%
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-16/table_16_rate_by_population_group_2013.xls

Now it put things into perspective right?

Activist like to spike the numbers for their means, but doing that too many time make me wise up and start to ask questions.

Edit: Missed out the link to how the study of 41% transgender suicide is taken
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/AFSP-Williams-Suicide-Report-Final.pdf
avatar
dtgreene: You are mis-reading that study. The yearly suicide rate of men isn't 20.7% (20.7 per 100); it's 20.7 per 100,000, or .00207%, or 4 magnitudes lower than what you were treating it. Therefore, the comparison isn't valid because you got the units wrong.
You are right. That's something bugging me about that figure. If it is correct man gone extinct in 5 years.

Sorry for the wrong info and thank you for correcting me.

Do you have a actual figure of reported transgender suicide per year.so I can compare the figures side by side?
Because I am skeptical with the figures since the activist cry wolf with the homicide numbers.
They pull all the data from survey of a small group of 6-7K people so it can be doctored. I need to see the transgender suicide per year to believe it.
Mysteriously I cannot find any numbers on that recently, and as if all the numbers are taken from survey with a small sample of people. Why there are no number of transgender suicide per year?

The best I can find is a 2005 post stating 1500 Gay and Lesbian youth commit suicide every year, when you compare it with the total population in that year 295.5M with 0.3% LGBT the percentage become very small.

Sorry but in the past number activist made up "1 in 12 transgender will be murdered" when calculation show 0.0022%. It make me skeptical of the activist survey.

Edit: I found something close to it, there are 20 reported transgender suicide in 2015
http://spectrum.suntimes.com/news/10/155/4495/report-ashley-hallstrom-20th-trans-suicide-year
With the number of transgender at 956700, how that makes it 41%?
Post edited May 29, 2016 by Gnostic
avatar
Gnostic: With the number of transgender at 956700, how that makes it 41%?
Because the 41% number comes from a poll asking living transgender if they have ever attempted suicide in their lifetime. I think you ask a good question though. How can so many be attempting suicide but only 20 succeeded last year? The hit rate seems to be on par with Imperial Stormtroopers. I think it has a lot to do with the activism. It's pretty clear that this interest group is trying to play up the numbers.

I also wouldn't be surprised if there is a disconnect in the survey. Did the survey ask whether the respondents "attempted" suicide or whether they have just "considered" suicide? I know it says "attempted" in the report....

But you are correct, the numbers make very little sense as stated...

The NTDS was launched in fall 2008 and was distributed
online and on paper through over 900 organizations that
were known venues for contact with the transgender
community throughout the United States. Details of
the survey instrument, methods and procedures have
previously been described (Grant et al., 2011). In brief,
responses were obtained from 6,456 self-identified
transgender and gender non-conforming adults aged 18
and over. History of lifetime suicide attempt was among
the many outcomes covered in the 70-item survey.
This part of the report begs a few questions. Did this distribution method allow activists to fluff the numbers to portray the issue as a bigger problem than it really is? It wouldn't take that much to "stuff the ballot box" to make it appear to be a much worse problem than reality. And given the online nature of the survey and how it's distributed through activist organizations, it really makes the findings questionable.
low rated
avatar
Gnostic: With the number of transgender at 956700, how that makes it 41%?
avatar
RWarehall: Because the 41% number comes from a poll asking living transgender if they have ever attempted suicide in their lifetime. I think you ask a good question though. How can so many be attempting suicide but only 20 succeeded last year? The hit rate seems to be on par with Imperial Stormtroopers. I think it has a lot to do with the activism. It's pretty clear that this interest group is trying to play up the numbers.
That 20 figure is, at best, just the number of *reported* suicides of transgender people. Many suicides go unreported, or in many cases, of a closeted or stealth trans person who doesn't appear as trans. (For example, some suicides occur before coming out.)

With the survey, I note that the survey consists of people who are out enough to be willing to take the survey. Some of those people may have been closeted when they attempted, or may have attempted before they even realized they were transgender.

Also, you seem to be missing a word between "transgender" and "if". Maybe you meant to put the word "person" there?
avatar
dtgreene: That 20 figure is, at best, just the number of *reported* suicides of transgender people. Many suicides go unreported, or in many cases, of a closeted or stealth trans person who doesn't appear as trans. (For example, some suicides occur before coming out.)

With the survey, I note that the survey consists of people who are out enough to be willing to take the survey. Some of those people may have been closeted when they attempted, or may have attempted before they even realized they were transgender.

Also, you seem to be missing a word between "transgender" and "if". Maybe you meant to put the word "person" there?
You know, the standard figure for suicide attempt to deaths is 25 to 1. Are you claiming 1,000's of suicides are being covered up every year? C'mon. Get real...

Despite your idiotic linguistic shenanigans, the statement reads fine. It would read fine if you substitute "cisgender" "Native American" "Black" "Hispanic". One does not have to use the redundant word "person" in every sentence if you want to get into pedantics. Of course you are only saying that to shift the topic away from this claim of yours which is obviously wrong...
Post edited May 29, 2016 by RWarehall