It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
A friendly reminder:

DON"T FEED THE TROLL!

You guys,by being outraged at his idiotic and bigoted posts,have given him for over 10 Pages just what he wants:Attention.
avatar
dudalb: A friendly reminder:

DON"T FEED THE TROLL!

You guys,by being outraged at his idiotic and bigoted posts,have given him for over 10 Pages just what he wants:Attention.
Fully agree. If you see a troll, either ignore him or counter the one or top most craziest statements and just state briefly that you disagree. Refrain from a prolonged discussion. That's usually the best.
avatar
Jonesy89: tl;dr: The big problem is forced outing.

Trans people are visible to others when going into or coming out of the stalls. By forcing people someone who looks very male into the woman's restroom, that person is effectively outed by the law to whoever witnesses them do so. That might not be so bad if there trans people aren't in danger of being victims of violence and if there are anti-discrimination ordinances to protect them from less immediate retribution. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Further, enacting this sort of law can help legitimize the pre-existing prejudice against trans people, which really doesn't help reduce the risk of, say, school bullying, or various other horrible shit.
But what do you suggest instead? That transgender people disguise their "sexuality" and go to the (from their point of view) wrong toilet in order to not get any attention? That sounds like putting all the burden on them.

I think this is wrong. Instead we need more respect. Being transgender is not better or worse than being anything else. If only we publicly make this opinion heard than any outing won't be a big problem at all. That (and huge penalties for school bullying and other shit) should be the preferred solution.

Also for a transition period maybe the law should be that transgender people can choose which toilet they want to use. The one that feels right or the one where nobody asks questions...

Or the proposal I made some pages ago: unisex toilets for adults. Solves quite some problems while open up others.
Post edited May 28, 2016 by Trilarion
avatar
dudalb: A friendly reminder:

DON"T FEED THE TROLL!

You guys,by being outraged at his idiotic and bigoted posts,have given him for over 10 Pages just what he wants:Attention.
Feeding trolls is often good fun, damn you ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFFgbc5Vcbw
Post edited May 28, 2016 by lazydog
low rated

If you want a specific case involving a transgender person, just look at Leelah Alcorn, a trans girl who committed suicide as a result of parents forcing her into a male role to the point of being abusive.

The suicide rate is staggeringly common among trans people; it's 41%. Yes, *forty-one* percent. That is *really* high. (Note that the rate decreases *significantly* after hormone treatment and surgery.)
avatar
RWarehall: Leelah killed herself. That is all. You are the sick individual trying to blame the parents for a tragedy. You call it abusive, but if Leelah wasn't so screwed up in the head, it should have been clear all she had to do was wait 2 more years and it would be her choice. Her parents did not kill Leelah, Leelah killed Leelah. And all you idiots popularizing her suicide note, just lead more people to kill themselves in some Monty Python-escue "Crack Suicide Squad" way.

If you want to start blaming the parents, you and many others should also shoulder the blame for your own recklessness. Suicide experts who have studied suicides for decades have found that making suicide notes public leads to more suicides than not. Following Leelah's death and the subsequent publishing of her note, transgender suicides jumped among teens. Who's at fault for that increase?
No, the parents are clearly to blame. In particular, if you look at the parents' actions, including, for example, isolating her from her friends, they are clearly signs of abuse. Her parents sent her into a degree of depression that led to her committing suicide. Seriously, read the note. (Note that this, of course, assumes you are mentally healthy; if you are not, then you might not want to read the note, as it could be triggering for obvious reasons.

(Yes, there is the issue of copycat suicides, but there is also the fact that awareness of the issue does need to be raised. Also, I note that Leelah *wanted* the note to be shared.)

Also, I'm not sick.

avatar
Dalthnock: Then why do they want to kill every man that looks/doesn't look at them, talks/doesn't talk to them, touches/doesn't touch them, in short any man that breathes & viciously attack/humiliate/dismember any woman who even slightly questions them?
Because, they don't?

Why did you put the word "Dragon" in your forum title?
Post edited May 28, 2016 by dtgreene
low rated
avatar
dudalb: A friendly reminder:

DON"T FEED THE TROLL!

You guys,by being outraged at his idiotic and bigoted posts,have given him for over 10 Pages just what he wants:Attention.
avatar
Trilarion: Fully agree. If you see a troll, either ignore him or counter the one or top most craziest statements and just state briefly that you disagree. Refrain from a prolonged discussion. That's usually the best.
avatar
Jonesy89: tl;dr: The big problem is forced outing.

Trans people are visible to others when going into or coming out of the stalls. By forcing people someone who looks very male into the woman's restroom, that person is effectively outed by the law to whoever witnesses them do so. That might not be so bad if there trans people aren't in danger of being victims of violence and if there are anti-discrimination ordinances to protect them from less immediate retribution. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Further, enacting this sort of law can help legitimize the pre-existing prejudice against trans people, which really doesn't help reduce the risk of, say, school bullying, or various other horrible shit.
avatar
Trilarion: But what do you suggest instead? That transgender people disguise their "sexuality" and go to the (from their point of view) wrong toilet in order to not get any attention? That sounds like putting all the burden on them.
I'm not sure I understand what you are asking, so I apologize if my response is off point. I am suggesting that these laws are bullshit and should be repealed; trans people are doing nothing wrong, and shouldn't have to have laws of this kind imposed on them. Laws like this are crap for the trans people who are presenting as their new gender identity since they risk being outed. Saying that trans people should hide their gender identity and use the bathroom in accordance with their birth gender isn't much better, since it all but amounts to trying to legislate trans people out of practical existence.
high rated
avatar
dtgreene: snip
In other words, you want us to take the words of a depressed, distressed and suicidal teen as 100% fact. And your justification to make a stupid decision and share a suicide note (leading to the deaths of others) is because this same depressed, distressed and suicidal teen wanted it public?

I wonder if you would have the same view of a divorced husband who commits suicide and leaves a note detailing "all the reasons" his ex-wife "caused" him to kill himself? This should be published because he wants it to be, right?

I've read the note, it sounds like exactly what I would expect from a suicidal person trying to justify why it's all "other people's fault" why she killed herself. The funny thing about life is there are two sides to every story. I also read the parents side. Have you? I've seriously considered both sides of the story. Have you?

I don't find "clear signs of abuse". I see parents who deeply cared about the well-being of their child and were doing what they thought was for her best. I see a disturbed child trying to find every reason to blame her parents. I don't see simple answers to this conflict and I see nothing which is as clear-cut as you seem to claim it to be. I see a tragedy. And I see an interest group attempting to take advantage of it for the gain of their cause.

---------------

And back to the actual topic...

C'mon, what does anyone think happened before this law? Did trans use restrooms? Was it really that big a deal?

What I see again is a political group attempting to capitalize on a non-issue. Granted, apparently other activists did the exact same thing by enacting another unnecessary law regarding bathrooms in one of the cities in the state. And so the cycle of stupidity and unneeded laws continues...
Post edited May 28, 2016 by RWarehall
avatar
dtgreene: Also, I'm not sick.
But you're not well.
low rated
avatar
Trilarion: I think this is wrong. Instead we need more respect. Being transgender is not better or worse than being anything else. If only we publicly make this opinion heard than any outing won't be a big problem at all.
Unfortunately, we tried that here in the states with regards to racism. While overtly racist laws are gone, racism is still very much alive and well here in the states.
avatar
Jonesy89: ...shouldn't have to have laws of this kind imposed on them. ...
I apologize if I created some confusion. I fully agree with you.

The only practical problem left is how to know if there is a genuine transgender person going to the women and girls toilet or a pedophile man in disguise. That's a bit of a practical problem where I would feel better if it could be solved somehow. I would not feel comfortable with any man (transgender or not) sharing the toilet (and definitely not the shower) with underage girls.
Post edited May 28, 2016 by Trilarion
avatar
dtgreene: Why did you put the word "Dragon" in your forum title?
What?
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: Why did you put the word "Dragon" in your forum title?
avatar
Dalthnock: What?
You asked me a question about feminists that has as much validity as the question I asked you about your forum title.
avatar
Dalthnock: What?
avatar
dtgreene: You asked me a question about feminists that has as much validity as the question I asked you about your forum title.
Validity rules

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcU7FaEEzNU
I wonder how he feels?
Attachments:
bige.jpg (65 Kb)
Post edited May 28, 2016 by tinyE
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: You asked me a question about feminists that has as much validity as the question I asked you about your forum title.
avatar
lazydog: Validity rules

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcU7FaEEzNU
Your link is useless to me (I don't follow links to random youtube videos), but the criteria for validity that the question about feminists violates is that it must not assume anything false. Hence, the question about the forum title that violates that same rule.

(Basically, if you ask why X is true, and X actually isn't true, the question is invalid.)
avatar
dtgreene: Your link is useless to me (I don't follow links to random youtube videos), but the criteria for validity that the question about feminists violates is that it must not assume anything false. Hence, the question about the forum title that violates that same rule.

(Basically, if you ask why X is true, and X actually isn't true, the question is invalid.)
gotta love invalid questions, they are the best kind.