It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Also in
high rated
avatar
yyahoo: I'm sorry. Let me rephrase. GOG does not care about rep, because it does not mean anything. It's a popularity contest. I just don't see the "harassment" angle. I've seen plenty of harassing and offensive talk that's been downrepped. Oh, but that's only harassing and offensive to my eyes. I'm sure the users that posted them just wanted to "speak their mind." That's the problem here. All this stuff you're talking about is subject to each individual's interpretation. Heck, I'm sure there are some that would call "downrepping" "speaking their mind", so you're actually attempting to do what you claim to be defending.
avatar
xyem: Let's see if I can make this clearer (he says, and then rewrites this post about 5 times).

tinyE (for example) is losing rep. There are two reasons why this could occur.

Firstly, he could be losing that rep incidentally. Perhaps a lot of his recent posts have had downratable content so as people downrate those downrate-worthy posts, he loses rep.

Secondly, he could be losing rep because someone (or some people) are trawling through his old posts and downrating all of them, regardless of their content.

The former is what you call "the popularity contest" and is acceptable because the post rating system is being used as intended. Those posts would have been downrated regardless of who posted them.

The latter is an abuse of the post rating system intended to reduce his rep.

When it goes from "it just happens to be tinyE making the downrated posts" to "we downrate these posts because they were made by tinyE".. it becomes harassment.
tinyE is a poor example. He is an antagonist. He has gone on sprees where he posts intentionally offensive things and begs people to downrep him. He simply enjoys the attention.

Regardless, I honestly interpret *both* of your examples as popularity contests. Sometimes it's an *un*popularity contest, but that's the same thing. In no way can I see any of this as harassment. It's a little meaningless number by your username. That number going up or going down cannot possibly be interpreted as harassment.
avatar
xyem:
avatar
yyahoo: tinyE is a poor example. He is an antagonist. He has gone on sprees where he posts intentionally offensive things and begs people to downrep him. He simply enjoys the attention.

Regardless, I honestly interpret *both* of your examples as popularity contests. Sometimes it's an *un*popularity contest, but that's the same thing. In no way can I see any of this as harassment. It's a little meaningless number by your username. That number going up or going down cannot possibly be interpreted as harassment.
99% true but I didn't post anything offensive yesterday and I lost a lot of points. I can't argue with the rest of your post.
avatar
yyahoo: tinyE is a poor example. He is an antagonist. He has gone on sprees where he posts intentionally offensive things and begs people to downrep him. He simply enjoys the attention.

Regardless, I honestly interpret *both* of your examples as popularity contests. Sometimes it's an *un*popularity contest, but that's the same thing. In no way can I see any of this as harassment. It's a little meaningless number by your username. That number going up or going down cannot possibly be interpreted as harassment.
avatar
tinyE: 99% true but I didn't post anything offensive yesterday and I lost a lot of points. I can't argue with the rest of your post.
Yeah, I didn't figure you'd be offended by any of that. ;)

I seem to recall you setting your title as "Attention Whore" for a significant period of time.


That said. I'm not sure why some of your old "attention getting" posts that you made days ago, couldn't continue to get downvoted even though you didn't actually post them yesterday.
Post edited July 20, 2013 by yyahoo
Unmechanical

http://www.gog.com/redeem/AY***BKS ( 554 backwards )
avatar
ne_zavarj: Unmechanical

http://www.gog.com/redeem/AY***BKS ( 554 backwards )
Invalid code.
avatar
ne_zavarj: Unmechanical

http://www.gog.com/redeem/AY***BKS ( 554 backwards )
Thank you +1
avatar
ne_zavarj: Unmechanical

http://www.gog.com/redeem/AY***BKS ( 554 backwards )
avatar
alexhatter: Thank you +1
You got that to work? What were we doing wrong?
avatar
alexhatter: Thank you +1
avatar
tinyE: You got that to work? What were we doing wrong?
The whole code was backwards. :)
avatar
alexhatter: The whole code was backwards. :)
Shit :/
avatar
xyem: <Xyem tips his hand>
My friend, I feel you tipped your hand here too early. You were only supposed to blow the bloody doors off! To be more specific, your stats would be better if it were a simple stat gathering project, rather than something with an agenda.

Maybe I've misunderstood, I am quite drunk...
There we go, -1!
avatar
yyahoo: tinyE is a poor example. He is an antagonist. He has gone on sprees where he posts intentionally offensive things and begs people to downrep him. He simply enjoys the attention.
Except all those reasons you gave are why tinyE is the best example. He is subject to both having his posts downrated because of their content and because someone is downrating his posts regardless of their content.

avatar
yyahoo: Regardless, I honestly interpret *both* of your examples as popularity contests. Sometimes it's an *un*popularity contest, but that's the same thing. In no way can I see any of this as harassment.
I can unravel your argument of "it's just a popularity contest" here in one simple statement. It only takes one person to not like you.

Really.. just imagine if I decided I didn't like you and felt it was okay to do it. I have the ability to downrate (and keep low-rated) every post you have made or will make on your account in a maximally efficient way... with little initial effort and no ongoing effort at all. Within 2 months, I'd have your rep in the negatives.

It isn't a popularity contest when the one person with the biggest guns wins.

avatar
yyahoo: It's a little meaningless number by your username.
Except it isn't a meaningless number because there are some people here who give it meaning. It gets used to stop people from entering groups and contests. That's a meaning. Enough people use it that GOG added it to the PM page due to the community requesting it. That's a meaning. Some people, in a trade, will demand the other person send their side of the trade first because they have low rep. That's a meaning. In most cases, people have just flat out earned that little number under their name (for the record, I'm don't feel like I'm one of them :P) and for some, that is meaning enough.

avatar
yyahoo: That number going up or going down cannot possibly be interpreted as harassment.
I've already stated that it isn't the number going down that is interpreted as harrassment. It is the abuse of the post rating system against a specific user that is the harassment.
avatar
xyem: <Xyem tips his hand>
avatar
wpegg: My friend, I feel you tipped your hand here too early. You were only supposed to blow the bloody doors off! To be more specific, your stats would be better if it were a simple stat gathering project, rather than something with an agenda.

Maybe I've misunderstood, I am quite drunk...
I don't understand why having an agenda would affect the statistics I get back from this.

I'm not looking to prove anything one way or another. Just providing a service and mentioned that if the data does point out something unusual, that I might investigate further and why.
Post edited July 20, 2013 by xyem
avatar
xyem: It isn't a popularity contest when the one person with the biggest guns wins.
The entire wet t-shirt contest paradigm contradicts this. :-)
Speaking of rep, EVERYONE GET AWAY FROM HOMER!!!!! AHHHHHH!!!!