It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
Man, Xyem, what are you talking about. This is not complicated. You said a guy would make 100 accounts to downrep someone. I say thats a crazy theory, no one would waste his time like that. Then you said it already happened, which was BS. Thats all.
avatar
Namur: I'm not sure if it's really necessary though, if you were to target the same posts you already did, with a different method, and observe an impact on rep and post rating that would discard timeline as a factor.
So, for example, instead of xyem sampling a more recent set of posts a group of three or four other folks could be directed to the posts xyem has already tested, have them down rep those, and see if there's any impact on rep. If there is, then we can say that posts don't become obsolete or invalid for purposes of rep effect based on their age. Correct? I just want to make sure I'm following properly.
avatar
jamotide: Man, Xyem, what are you talking about. This is not complicated. You said a guy would make 100 accounts to downrep someone. I say thats a crazy theory, no one would waste his time like that. Then you said it already happened, which was BS. Thats all.
It doesn't have to be 100 . 5-10 with a bot can do the trick just fine.


BTW, this brought any relevant results so far ?
avatar
jamotide:
avatar
Licurg: BTW, this brought any relevant results so far ?
Yes, we've discovered that the Milky Way is really just a Snickers without peanuts.
avatar
tinyE: Yes, we've discovered that the Milky Way is really just a Snickers without peanuts.
OH MY GOD ! THINK OF THE CONSEQUENCES !
avatar
HomerSimpson: So, for example, instead of xyem sampling a more recent set of posts a group of three or four other folks could be directed to the posts xyem has already tested, have them down rep those, and see if there's any impact on rep. If there is, then we can say that posts don't become obsolete or invalid for purposes of rep effect based on their age. Correct? I just want to make sure I'm following properly.
Yes, something like that.

It was just a thought, it could be relevant to test a 'fresh' batch anyway for stuff i havent' conisdered.
avatar
tinyE: Yes, we've discovered that the Milky Way is really just a Snickers without peanuts.
Which is exactly why I prefer Milky Ways. Haven't had one in years now that I think about it.
avatar
tinyE: Yes, we've discovered that the Milky Way is really just a Snickers without peanuts.
avatar
Shaolin_sKunk: Which is exactly why I prefer Milky Ways. Haven't had one in years now that I think about it.
We have them at our B&B. Sometimes.
avatar
jamotide: Man, Xyem, what are you talking about. This is not complicated. You said a guy would make 100 accounts to downrep someone. I say thats a crazy theory, no one would waste his time like that. Then you said it already happened, which was BS. Thats all.
Thank you for demonstrating how to actually dodge a question, illustrating perfectly how I did not. Good job.

Indeed, it isn't complicated.. but it would appear you struggle to understand "GameRager did it".

Also, I don't appreciate you making baseless accusations of me lying to everyone, so please stop doing that.
avatar
jamotide: Man, Xyem, what are you talking about. This is not complicated. You said a guy would make 100 accounts to downrep someone. I say thats a crazy theory, no one would waste his time like that. Then you said it already happened, which was true. Thats all.
There. Fixed that for you.

Sure, it weren't exactly 100 accounts. But nitpicking about an exact number doesn't change the fact that multiple accounts have been made before for the sole reason of manipulating both the own and other people's rep,
avatar
Licurg: It doesn't have to be 100 . 5-10 with a bot can do the trick just fine.

BTW, this brought any relevant results so far ?
I'm just starting the next stage of testing.. will be posting the results shortly.
avatar
jamotide: Man, Xyem, what are you talking about. This is not complicated. You said a guy would make 100 accounts to downrep someone. I say thats a crazy theory, no one would waste his time like that. Then you said it already happened, which was BS. Thats all.
I am not making accusations, but jamotide have you never heard of bots? Never met people who want to do nothing but cause others problems or just boost their own position in the world?
If not you are really lucky, but the rest of us - well we all know people like this exist and even worst, they appear to flourish on the internet with the ability to duplicate themselves for self satisfaction.
avatar
jamotide: Man, Xyem, what are you talking about. This is not complicated. You said a guy would make 100 accounts to downrep someone. I say thats a crazy theory, no one would waste his time like that. Then you said it already happened, which was BS. Thats all.
avatar
011284mm: I am not making accusations, but jamotide have you never heard of bots? Never met people who want to do nothing but cause others problems or just boost their own position in the world?
If not you are really lucky, but the rest of us - well we all know people like this exist and even worst, they appear to flourish on the internet with the ability to duplicate themselves for self satisfaction.
I'd also like to add that their are people who do it just for the lulz. Causing havock for no other reason than simple enjoyment.
avatar
Licurg: It doesn't have to be 100 . 5-10 with a bot can do the trick just fine.

BTW, this brought any relevant results so far ?
avatar
xyem: I'm just starting the next stage of testing.. will be posting the results shortly.
Will there be cake?
Why have I only discovered this thread now? I got no problems with my rep (yet :D), but feel free to include me as well, if you need more people :)