PookaMustard: The four voters would be scrutinized.
Boom, there it is. If you get hammered rapidly, then a lot of suspicion is going to fall on those doing it. If both scum are on the wagon, and town scrutinizes those on the wagon, and cop investigates among the wagon, then we've got a lot more eyes looking in the right places.
And if scum don't quick/slide(?) hammer, then the problem doesn't exist in the first place.
Bookwyrm627: And that is a concern, since you're at the top of my scum list.
PookaMustard: Then let us get started by telling me what's wrong. Where do you get your feelings about me?
Fine. Someone has to kick discussion off anyway.
And before you say it, yes, you've already responded to some of these in some fashion, back when they first came up.
Let's start with 23. The framing of events bothered me, and I noted this post in my post 24.
Post 48: "Yay for decisive town!" and everywhere else "Guys we're moving too fast slow down!"
'->There seems to be a disconnect here. Also, I'm not a fan of waiting for the deadline for the sake of waiting for the deadline.
We had our...discussion...about GR having/not having a chance to chime in, etc.
As I noted in 89, I didn't care for the counterargument paragraph. Also, the way certain people who did some similar things but got no comment made the whole post look like building a case on a player who is routinely regarded with some suspicion because he is generally reticent.
From 109, there is the oddly specific interpretation of the meaning of my and ZFR's questions/comments toward Lift back in D0, and there is the subsequent OMGUS push on ZFR.
In 219, I can't shake the feeling that "I believe Flub" is a little bit of buttering up.