Posted February 25, 2016
Fell asleep again.
First, I'd like to echo to Ixam what RWarehall stated above.
I was thinking about Krypsyn's post…the part about other wagons (besides Ixam) providing better analysis.
If Ixam is scum then Dessimu is very likely town. Flubb might look suspicious for leaving Ixam’s wagon when it reached L-2, it would depend on how it played out. If Ixam is town then 1-2 scum (assuming 3 scum total) are likely on his wagon. Probably not much more to work with.
A player who has made more accusations and observations (apart from flavor) would likely have more useful analysis to their wagon.
I have one player as fairly solid town. Almost everyone else is somewhere in varying degrees of neutral. I am suspicious of Ixam for reasons already stated. Not being willing to identify potential scum candidates does not help.
For this reason, I’m also suspicious of CSPVG, he made a cryptic response about his vote on yogs but seems unwilling to name a real suspect. An inability to commit is often a scum sign. A CSPVG wagon at this point would also provide minimal analysis.
Dessimu has made several solid arguments. I may not agree with them all but he is no longer at the top of my list.
Lift’s vote on Ixam was not unexpected given the situation. Saying Ixam admitted to not being invested in the game was a twist of Ixam’s words. Given Ixam’s play, it was also unnecessary, there are already sufficient reasons to vote for Ixam. The extra embellishment feels like scum trying too hard to make their case. I believe we have more to learn from Lift’s wagon than the other players I find scummy:
Vote Liftrhasil
First, I'd like to echo to Ixam what RWarehall stated above.
I was thinking about Krypsyn's post…the part about other wagons (besides Ixam) providing better analysis.
If Ixam is scum then Dessimu is very likely town. Flubb might look suspicious for leaving Ixam’s wagon when it reached L-2, it would depend on how it played out. If Ixam is town then 1-2 scum (assuming 3 scum total) are likely on his wagon. Probably not much more to work with.
A player who has made more accusations and observations (apart from flavor) would likely have more useful analysis to their wagon.
I have one player as fairly solid town. Almost everyone else is somewhere in varying degrees of neutral. I am suspicious of Ixam for reasons already stated. Not being willing to identify potential scum candidates does not help.
For this reason, I’m also suspicious of CSPVG, he made a cryptic response about his vote on yogs but seems unwilling to name a real suspect. An inability to commit is often a scum sign. A CSPVG wagon at this point would also provide minimal analysis.
Dessimu has made several solid arguments. I may not agree with them all but he is no longer at the top of my list.
Lift’s vote on Ixam was not unexpected given the situation. Saying Ixam admitted to not being invested in the game was a twist of Ixam’s words. Given Ixam’s play, it was also unnecessary, there are already sufficient reasons to vote for Ixam. The extra embellishment feels like scum trying too hard to make their case. I believe we have more to learn from Lift’s wagon than the other players I find scummy:
Vote Liftrhasil