TStael: Right back at ya - hi that is. I appreciate as such that you are upfront about the fact that you have not played TW2 - but this also means that you should claim a fair ("objective") subjective view only once you have played this title. It is not too late to PM and apologize to DZ, either, if you wish.
In my single play-through, either Philippa or Cynthia, cannot remember which one now, hanged herself. So one highly unhappy, and I do think coincidentally lesbian, person there.
Or maybe not. At that time, Poland made regrettable news of openly anti-gay symbol being approved by the Constitutional Court as a Party Emblem.
It is not about pleasing everyone, but rather pleasing or displeasing without a particular bias.
Hi. Yes, my contribution about TW2 is only "objective" as an "impartial outsider", as I have not played the game, yet.
Subjectively, I think I would react just like you and most people, and find "Dethmold" a disgusting criminal.. I have, like all of us I dare to hope,
zero tolerance for sexual abuses.. As the game authors seems to have understood and scened it, his victim being of the same gender only aggravate things and "Dethmold" being cut clear of his "tool" seems a fit punishment to that.. Sorry.
Our current discussion highlights something though, it seems the focus of the game authors on Dethmold is not his homosexuality at all, but his creepy abuses, as a shameful consequence of being a powerful man in this game, as a sorcerer and a politician..
As for the infamous "political correctness".. The issue is highly complex, but this quotation sums up pretty much everything I have against the gay activists propaganda pushing claims for "unfair discrimination" and "equality" in each and every aspects of our lives..
“Gender, race and impairment all relate to what a person is, whereas homosexuality relates to what a person does.”
For me to apologize to @DarkZephyr.. Our argument was not about "Dethmold" and TW2 chosen way to portray male homosexuality (or rather to USE it, as within the game's context it can't be mistaken for "romantic interest") so I don't believe I have been unfair to him or her in that event. Certainly not for the real issue we had beside the "tone" of my words.
Thanks though, for reminding me. I trust we live to learn as a higher purpose, mainly through our "experiences" and more often than not, our mistakes.. To fix these mistakes, thus correcting our flaws, and strive to find forgiveness from people we regret to hurt, to have hurt in this process to self-improvement.. On that, it seems we can fully agree. So, thank you! :)
Unrelated addition, I read in your other reply to another post, you write : "I actually do believe that history is mainly opportunistic."
Indeed! "Winners" make, write
their "history" for the reference, "losers" are / were the enemies and therefore lose, got lost.. Always!
Edit : @TStael, I'm playing the Witcher 2, finally.. By the tavern in the forest town, looking for Triss's whereabouts in the other witch's room upstairs, I've just found in the next room the woman's owner crying over her friend / prostitute worker, killed.. She explained there's a hole in the wall and they heard noises, while seemingly engaged in lesbian sex.. Geralt and I think the bard stood still silently, while she argued and justified herself with, "hey, we weren't doing anything wrong, I was just comforting my girl mistreated by some clients.."
So we both have some more points proven right here, for you the negative / moral disapproval is apparently there by Geralt and the bard at least, while both remained neutrally mute.. Hence for me, the neutral / positive portrayal of such scenes for lesbians is also there..
By all the gathered evidence, I believe it safe to conclude by now, with all such efforts made in nuancing homosexuality's portrayal and morality taken into account, that actually the game design does NOT support an "anti-gay" stance, on the contrary it is very open to the player's own intepretation, proving you ARE wrong in your assumptions, as I first pointed out.. Period.