It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
sunshinecorp: Pantsu to Chokki no Sensō jan yo
http://space-dandy.wikia.com/wiki/The_War_of_the_Undies_and_Vests,_Baby
Never watched it, but that sounded like fun. Cheers.
avatar
SalarShushan: I am way late for the Ghibli discussion but, personally, I loved both Studio Ghibli's adaptation of Howl's Moving Castle as well as the books. I liked the movie better at first, which I saw before reading the books, but the series grew on me and now I like them both equally well in their own way. Yes, it seems so different, they could have changed it a bit more and not even used the name, but as it was; if they hadn't kept the name, the story was still close enough to get the animators into trouble.

I was surprised no one mentioned My Neighbor Totoro, The Cat Returns, Whisper of the Heart, Ponyo, or My Neighbors, the Yamadas. We loved those films too. Kiki's Delivery Service, Porco Rosso, and The Secret World of Arrietty were very good too, though not as moving as Spirited Away or Castle in the Sky.
avatar
ddickinson: I enjoyed both versions of Howl's Moving Castle. I prefer the book, and agree there are a lot of things missing on the anime, but I still found it enjoyable to watch. I have yet to see a Studio Ghibli movie that I did not like, I love most of them. The closest I came to one I did not like was Ponyo, it was okay, but seemed a bit too much like the kind of story Disney would do, IMO.

Did you like Grave of the Fireflies? I really liked the story and atmosphere. It does not seem as popular as other Ghibli movies, but it's got the same quality and emotional story that make Studio Ghibli's anime so good.
I absolutely love Ghibli's version of Howl's Moving Castle. As a film, it has wonderful pacing, and Sophia may be even more appealing when you don't realize she is gifted too. One of the best things about the movie is appreciating the young spirit that can still be inside an older person, and it actually comes off as showing a spirited 'muggle' as valuable in this magical situation, which is a rare thought in entertainments these days. I felt it made the movie a little stronger that Sophie was adding her two sensible cents to events despite the 'scary' powers of the wizards, witches, and king's armies. That was very courageous of her. :D

OTOH, the Sophie of the books who is learning to believe in herself and her gifts is also quite a fun character.

I found Fireflies to be a bit grim, honestly. Its very well done, but such a sad subject. Its moving, like Letters from Iwo Jima, but I didn't want to watch that movie twice either. Since I actually like rather a lot of Disney (especially Pixar) stuff, I guess it figures that Ponyo would appeal to me. ;-)
avatar
HypersomniacLive: What?!? You think I'm wandering around with my bum exposed to the whole forum?!? Sorry ma'am, you err - I refuse to wear underpants, not pants - there's quite a difference. (~_^)
Not when you choose to wear assless-chaps (see attached picture). I'm sorry to tell you, but those sir, are not pants :-). They fail to cover vital areas that would make them pants. So until you put some proper trousers on, I will be forced to concentrate on your peeping eye :-).

avatar
SalarShushan: ...
I agree with you on both points, about Ghibli's version of Howl's Moving Castle and the Grave of the Fireflies. I am still a much bigger fan of the book over the anime of Howl's Moving Castle, but it is still a wonderful story with some very nice characters.

I would watch Howl's Moving Castle anytime, but I would have to be in the right mood to watch Fireflies, just because of its story. It is a beautiful piece of anime though and I would recommend it to everyone, even if they only watch it once. The fact that a cartoon can have such strong plot elements and emotional story shows just how good anime can be for serious topics, as well as for fun topics.

avatar
Crewdroog: You are correct in your description of jelly. I personally prefer jam though. It's kinda like chunky vs smooth peanut butter.
Do they both taste the same, jelly and jam? I have never tried (American) jelly so I am not sure if there is any real difference in taste, or if it is just a different texture.
Attachments:
Post edited October 23, 2014 by ddickinson
avatar
ddickinson: Not when you choose to wear assless-chaps (see attached picture). I'm sorry to tell you, but those sir, are not pants :-). They fail to cover vital areas that would make them pants. So until you put some proper trousers on, I will be forced to concentrate on your peeping eye :-).

[...]
XD - you seem to know all the ins and outs about men's apparel... ~_^
avatar
HypersomniacLive: XD - you seem to know all the ins and outs about men's apparel... ~_^
I always thought assless-chaps were unisex, not just men's apparel. The last person I saw wearing them was a woman on T.V., though she had pants on underneath.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: XD - you seem to know all the ins and outs about men's apparel... ~_^
avatar
ddickinson: I always thought assless-chaps were unisex, not just men's apparel. The last person I saw wearing them was a woman on T.V., though she had pants on underneath.
Okay, correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that ALL chaps are assless (making it a redundant statement). Were they not designed to protect one's pants as a supplementary item? Is it not par for the course to wear pants with chaps in any working situation? I've never worn chaps, but I've always been confused by this statement ...

Edit: By the way, cool giveaway : D I'm not in, but I appreciate the sentiment. Also, thanks for your general generosity as well DD!
Post edited October 23, 2014 by Narcia_
avatar
ddickinson: I always thought assless-chaps were unisex, not just men's apparel. The last person I saw wearing them was a woman on T.V., though she had pants on underneath.
Kinda half-arsed. ~_^

On a more serious note, Narcia_ is correct regarding the purpose and usage of chaps.
avatar
Narcia_: Okay, correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that ALL chaps are assless (making it a redundant statement). Were they not designed to protect one's pants as a supplementary item? Is it not par for the course to wear pants with chaps in any working situation? I've never worn chaps, but I've always been confused by this statement ...

Edit: By the way, cool giveaway : D I'm not in, but I appreciate the sentiment. Also, thanks for your general generosity as well DD!
You are completely correct. As far as I know, they are indeed a supplementary item of clothing to protect the pants. I guess because they are considered to go with pants, that as they are pointless without pants, that the term assless-chaps came around to describe people (like Hyper ;-) ) who wear them with no pants. A clearly redundant statement that somehow still manages to have a purpose, isn't the English language grand :-).
avatar
Narcia_: Okay, correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that ALL chaps are assless (making it a redundant statement). Were they not designed to protect one's pants as a supplementary item? Is it not par for the course to wear pants with chaps in any working situation? I've never worn chaps, but I've always been confused by this statement ...

Edit: By the way, cool giveaway : D I'm not in, but I appreciate the sentiment. Also, thanks for your general generosity as well DD!
avatar
ddickinson: You are completely correct. As far as I know, they are indeed a supplementary item of clothing to protect the pants. I guess because they are considered to go with pants, that as they are pointless without pants, that the term assless-chaps came around to describe people (like Hyper ;-) ) who wear them with no pants. A clearly redundant statement that somehow still manages to have a purpose, isn't the English language grand :-).
oO As protection for pants? Aren't pants usually damaged in the crotch after a certain mileage of walking? What use is protection for the legs? I always thought those things are purely a certain style and don't serve any practical purpose outside of horse riding maybe, but who does this all day anymore?
Post edited October 23, 2014 by Klumpen0815
avatar
awalterj: 8 out of 11 female members appear to have a mostly positive leaning towards the strategy genre, that's 73%.
(added you, Elendiel, dudetterinazor, Treasure, FoxySage and gandalfnho to the strategy genre approving group)
avatar
FoxySage: Uhm, sorry for messing up your statistic but i'm a guy. :)
My apologies for unwittingly genderbendering you! Maybe it's because your forum title says "wallflower" and in German, all flowers are female. The sun is also female, contrary to Latin where both the sun and flower are male.

That brings the F.A.S. Index (Female Appreciation of Strategy Index) down from 73% to 70%.
avatar
Klumpen0815: Aren't pants usually damaged in the crotch after a certain mileage of walking?
Only if you have balls of steel and they got rusty.
avatar
FoxySage: Uhm, sorry for messing up your statistic but i'm a guy. :)
avatar
awalterj: My apologies for unwittingly genderbendering you! Maybe it's because your forum title says "wallflower" and in German, all flowers are female. The sun is also female, contrary to Latin where both the sun and flower are male.

That brings the F.A.S. Index (Female Appreciation of Strategy Index) down from 73% to 70%.
Eh, it's fine. Not the first time people has confused me for being female on the internet. :P
avatar
awalterj: My apologies for unwittingly genderbendering you! Maybe it's because your forum title says "wallflower" and in German, all flowers are female. The sun is also female, contrary to Latin where both the sun and flower are male.

That brings the F.A.S. Index (Female Appreciation of Strategy Index) down from 73% to 70%.
avatar
FoxySage: Eh, it's fine. Not the first time people has confused me for being female on the internet. :P
Been there. People often think I'm human, haha.
avatar
FoxySage: Eh, it's fine. Not the first time people has confused me for being female on the internet. :P
avatar
Klumpen0815: Been there. People often think I'm human, haha.
Are you a four hundred foot tall purple platypus bear with pink horns and silver wings?
Post edited October 24, 2014 by FoxySage
avatar
ddickinson: You are completely correct. As far as I know, they are indeed a supplementary item of clothing to protect the pants. I guess because they are considered to go with pants, that as they are pointless without pants, that the term assless-chaps came around to describe people (like Hyper ;-) ) who wear them with no pants. A clearly redundant statement that somehow still manages to have a purpose, isn't the English language grand :-).
Thanks for the clarification! (also to HypersomniacLive)

English is hilarious. I love it. I guess "assless chaps" came into fashion because people like to be cheeky (pun kind of intended) and like to say ass a lot. I might have coined "pantless chaps" or "pants free chaps" or something instead.