Links: I never engage with someone representing a company on a personal level. If I see a blue post then it means I'm talking to a GOG.COM employee who is representing that company, I don't care who they are as far as that particular interaction goes; I don't even look at the user name if I don't need to.
GameRager: This doesn't answer my question(or maybe you hinted at it and I didn't get it): Do you want people risking their jobs to give you a more verbose/in depth answer?
If I always take my communications with employees representing a company just as that, and not as a personal communication with that individual, how could I ever ask anything from them that would go against the company's designs? My comments are at the company GOG.COM, not at some particular employee.
Would you care to comment on how your original opinion over my post (making it short: "the poor person is just doing what they are told, how dare you!") has nothing to do with what I was saying? Read my comment again, realizing I'm talking to GOG.COM, not to [let me look it up...] "Ashleee", and express your opinion then if you care.
Links: After beginning to read the rest of your post, I'm not reading the rest. I got your
"let's put everyone who complains about any particular thing that GOG does in the same bag without really addressing any of their criticisms" view form your first couple of posts in the thread. No need for me to read you reiterate any of it.
GameRager: The other stuff(past the ===) was more me musing and to everyone here, not to you specifically(sorry if it came off as such)....and also NOT about everyone complaining about this.
That said I wasn't trying to address anyone's criticisms(I did that in a few others posts elsewhere) ...I was just trying to raise what I see as a valid point: i.e. that in THIS CASE there are some complaining over this ONE thing, who were seemingly okay with GOG when GOG gave them/us a bunch of other things. To me this is a bit hypocritical of the few doing it, so I felt the need to mention it.
I try to discuss ideas, not people. I couldn't care less what Peter, Paul or Mary have said in the past if what they say now is logical and factual. I do not keep "virtual personas" of forum participants in my head, and try to use my brain power for better things. That is on top of me simply not knowing anything about those past opinions since I keep out of the usual forum drama, either for or against GOG.
In this particular case, even if I cared about the "forumites" past record: how could praising someone for an action and then disagreeing with actions that same someone takes,
that go in direct opposition to the previous action's spirit, ever be called hypocrisy? To the contrary, it is perfectly consistent thought and behaviour.