It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
And once again, I'm sorry I came in here. :P
you are fine being around here, oh great prophet of Cthulhu, just I agree with ur 'daddy' on the topic we our strangely discussion bout children doing major crimes such as murder.
low rated
I am a Scandi, and do love our morality, but let me just be clear.

I do not even start to imagine Mexico as LeonardoCornejo does. But he/she does too - no ref to any purported crime by a nine year old.

Be it Finland or Mexico, a nine year old perpetrating a serios crime could most likely not be sane, or true.

Or, LeonardoCornejo?
low rated
avatar
Regals: If you are old enough to do the crime you are old enough to pay for it.
avatar
tinyE: So you think a 5 year old that kills someone should get life without parole and or the chair?
Well since you disagree what is your great wisdom that should be done after a 7 year old kid gets a gun and kills someones father, husband , grandfather?
low rated
avatar
tinyE: So you think a 5 year old that kills someone should get life without parole and or the chair?
avatar
Regals: Well since you disagree what is your great wisdom that should be done after a 7 year old kid gets a gun and kills someones father, husband , grandfather?
I think that after the 7 year old kills someones father, husband, grandfather, he should take the gun and use it to kill you.

BTW, what's the the patriarchal crap? No love for Aunt Gwendoline or Granny Perkins?
avatar
Regals: Well since you disagree what is your great wisdom that should be done after a 7 year old kid gets a gun and kills someones father, husband , grandfather?
avatar
tinyE: I think that after the 7 year old kills someones father, husband, grandfather, he should take the gun and use it to kill you.

BTW, what's the the patriarchal crap? No love for Aunt Gwendoline or Granny Perkins?
your daddy is either just want his 'son' to love him or he is a MISOGYNIST!
low rated
avatar
Regals: Well since you disagree what is your great wisdom that should be done after a 7 year old kid gets a gun and kills someones father, husband , grandfather?
avatar
tinyE: I think that after the 7 year old kills someones father, husband, grandfather, he should take the gun and use it to kill you.
Trash as usual.

But eram what if I come to hawii with that gun and put it in your mouth bro?
Illegal immigrants are not even documented are they bro?

Bunch of 10 year olds on GOG might miss you?
Post edited August 19, 2016 by Regals
avatar
tinyE: I think that after the 7 year old kills someones father, husband, grandfather, he should take the gun and use it to kill you.
avatar
Regals: Trash as usual.
Well, like father like son. :D
avatar
Regals: Trash as usual.
avatar
tinyE: Well, like father like son. :D
^ LOL Regals got burned! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdUdp_a6zMo
Post edited August 19, 2016 by GabesterOne
low rated
avatar
Regals: Trash as usual.
avatar
tinyE: Well, like father like son. :D
Don't forget to change your underwear Eram.
avatar
TStael: I am a Scandi, and do love our morality, but let me just be clear.

I do not even start to imagine Mexico as LeonardoCornejo does. But he/she does too - no ref to any purported crime by a nine year old.

Be it Finland or Mexico, a nine year old perpetrating a serios crime could most likely not be sane, or true.

Or, LeonardoCornejo?
Um. The she was uncalled for. As I said. In Mexico it is not the case, but if you want an example of a child viciously murdering someone and proving he deserved the electric chair in adulthood just look up Carlos Salinas de Gortari. That fucker killed his maid when he was a child, his brother was his accomplice. He got away with it. Then he became one of the most vicious men ever seen in Mexico. And yes. If you viciously murder someone as a child you are far too messed up for salvation. Most children are born as decent human beings, but some are atrocious and beyond salvation from birth.
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: I don't think companies would want employees who are likely to harass other employees, as that can lead to reduced productivity and potentially even to lawsuits.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: True indeed. And that is why companies often reject people with careers such as "gender studies" or "queer studies". You see, you don't want someone who will pester you over their personal life style.
Here is the thing: Studies have shown that having a more diverse work force leads to higher productivity. Hence, it is important to have a diverse work force, and it is therefore important not to have employees that would harass those who happen to be different.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: True indeed. And that is why companies often reject people with careers such as "gender studies" or "queer studies". You see, you don't want someone who will pester you over their personal life style.
avatar
dtgreene: Here is the thing: Studies have shown that having a more diverse work force leads to higher productivity. Hence, it is important to have a diverse work force, and it is therefore important not to have employees that would harass those who happen to be different.
In some cases the different ones are the harassers. Let's use myself as an example. I am Mexican, but, my skin is pale and my eyes green, I would pass for anything but Mexican here. When I was younger I faced discrimination because of that. "Go back to your country fucking gringo" was a rather familiar sentence.
The thing is, let's say because of that I have a chip on my shoulder. Now, let's say I get hired by a company, and every time I have a disagreement with someone, or in any other form I am upset with something or someone in the company I accuse them of racism and present lawsuits stating i am being discriminated because my skin is not of the same color.
Eventually my superiors would want me to GTFO.
Now. Based on that experience they may decide to hire anyone who matches my profile.
It is unfair, I know, but it is their right to not hire someone, even if that harms their business, and it is also their right to do what they must to protect their asse[t]s.

Now. Let's say I move to USA, remember I am Mexican. If I get hired by a company and start suing everyone over racism and discrimination claims they would want my head on a basket.

That is the problem with people in gender studies, transgenders, feminists, some homosexuals, immigrants, black people in some countries, and well, all those focused on their traits. They will sue their employers over discrimination claims so often their employers would rather not hire anyone matching that profile.

It is a fool proof defense mechanism against meddling lawyers and truly oppressive authorities and laws. Oppressive authorities and laws from which SJWs have gained benefit for too long.
low rated
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: In some cases the different ones are the harassers.
Except that those cases are a minority.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: That is the problem with people in gender studies, transgenders, feminists, some homosexuals, immigrants, black people in some countries, and well, all those focused on their traits. They will sue their employers over discrimination claims so often their employers would rather not hire anyone matching that profile.
Except that law suits take lots of time and money, so a minority person would be unlikely to sue unless there is a case of actual discrimination.

Also, "transgender" is an adjective, not a noun, so "transgenders" isn't a word.
Post edited August 20, 2016 by dtgreene
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: In some cases the different ones are the harassers.
avatar
dtgreene: Except that those cases are a minority.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: That is the problem with people in gender studies, transgenders, feminists, some homosexuals, immigrants, black people in some countries, and well, all those focused on their traits. They will sue their employers over discrimination claims so often their employers would rather not hire anyone matching that profile.
avatar
dtgreene: Except that law suits take lots of time and money, so a minority person would be unlikely to sue unless there is a case of actual discrimination.

Also, "transgender" is an adjective, not a noun, so "transgenders" isn't a word.
Not really. Have you watched that South Park episode. I think it is called Tolerance Death Camp? In that episode they mock an exploitable aspect of discrimination lawsuits. I am not going into detail, but the thing is, in some countries you can exploit discrimination claims for profit. And that is why companies avoid certain profiles when hiring personnel. They need compliant, useful, and overall calm employees, not walking lawsuits.