It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: So. One of Green Day's members, the bass guy, decided to become holier than thou and said Video games and MMA are too violent and calling for their end. Fucking hipster punk faggot. I hated them since "Wake Me Up When September Ends" came out and ever since then I hate them a bit more.
[url=
https://youtu.be/KxjoQWsrNXQ]
https://youtu.be/KxjoQWsrNXQ[/url]
For me "Violent video games" are not in themselves an issue, I see them as a safe release for primal instincts that may have helped mankind survive to modern times (that don't really fit in the modern world). I guess the same could pretty much be said of the MMA as well.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: So. One of Green Day's members, the bass guy, decided to become holier than thou and said Video games and MMA are too violent and calling for their end. Fucking hipster punk faggot. I hated them since "Wake Me Up When September Ends" came out and ever since then I hate them a bit more.
[url=
https://youtu.be/KxjoQWsrNXQ]
https://youtu.be/KxjoQWsrNXQ[/url]

Zoe Quinn spreads lies again, this time on Vice.
https://youtu.be/cHWYJauXZik

Aand Stan Lee Makes an statement on Zendaya as Mary Jane Watson. All he cares about is good acting. You might think it conflicts with what he said about tokenism in the past, but it actually makes sense for him to care more about acting, and if there is no signs of tokenism, well, it is fine for him. And remember the backlash he got in the past for his statement about not changing characters.
https://youtu.be/NBhPuog4TA4
Green Day...Lulz.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo:
Even poser punk bands are screeching about "buuuut think of the children"? These are truly dark times.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: So. One of Green Day's members, the bass guy, decided to become holier than thou and said Video games and MMA are too violent and calling for their end. Fucking hipster punk faggot. I hated them since "Wake Me Up When September Ends" came out and ever since then I hate them a bit more.
avatar
Garrison72: Green Day...Lulz.
The dude is in his mid-40s, rocking eyeliner and emo hair. I think that's all that needs to be said.
avatar
Garrison72: Green Day...Lulz.
avatar
I2epresent: The dude is in his mid-40s, rocking eyeliner and emo hair. I think that's all that needs to be said.
Mid 40s? I expected him to be around my age.
avatar
Garrison72: Green Day...Lulz.
avatar
I2epresent: The dude is in his mid-40s, rocking eyeliner and emo hair. I think that's all that needs to be said.
mid 40s? so he's my age. I guess idiocy knows no age limit.

I personally, I don't see him as "thinking" (if you can call it that) beyond himself. He doesn't like something, it must go. I could almost understand his reasoning on being subjected to the MMA but he chose to be at a venue that featured it.

But how was he forced to endure the games though?
low rated
avatar
TStael: Rude, dense and misandryst?

You really have not ever come across a fellow fora member a bit different in their values as you, before?

Really?

You were the one whom thought awry of "she." I think "she" is neutral/fine in these fora. You were the one whom stated "electrocuting," Opposing death penalty is pretty normal in Europe.

So please - do abuse someone as dense and rude as me. I still will not think Mexican children should be executed, or are nothing but children.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: No. It is not a general rule. I think you don't understand the concept of individual cases and case by case basis. Each case individually. Death penalty is a drastic measure to the most serious actions. It is a way to guarantee with 100% certainty there will be no repeats. Trust me, many Nazi officers were executed for their actions because the chances of them starting the same shit again were high.

Now, it is not that your values are different, many around here have different values to mine, for example many consider the minimal consenting age in Mexico and Japan too low, I find it just fine.

"The correct neutral is neither he nor she, the correct neutral is it, or if you want to sound a bit confusing, they, I think we have reached an agreement on that. And if I don't like being called a she is because, first, that is a false statement about me, I don't like false statements, second, I use my true name, so nobody could confuse me for a female, there are no women named Leonardo at all, and third, I am not amused with the "preferred pronoun" thing. If you are physically male, you ara a man to me, and I will address you as such, if your screen name is male and I can't see your body I will assume you are male. That is why I said the she was uncalled for, because it was not necessary."

If you think you can go and provoke me you will find yourself in a serious pickle because I am not the kind of man who goes for the low hanging fruit and uses petty insults and threats. I am far worse than that because I refute the arguments I can and use those refuted arguments to prove you are in fact either foolish, insane, a liar, or someone who has been lied to.

PS: And sorry if I think Carlos Salinas should have been killed many times, but after seeing how he fucked, and still fucks my country through proxies, I want him dead.
Whether you go on about death penalty or age of consent - I prefer legal principle to case by case, by Scandi and EU morality.

Is this morality tougth? you might ask. Wrong question I think. I simply think human life is invaluable and children should have the rights to be children.

What do you mean? you probaly ask. Let me tell. Human beings are not rid of their lives by the state. And children are not legally copulated with.

What is that hard about morality above? ;-)

And I'd suggest not to try your gender distiction complex with a Finn.

Finnish - with only Turkish I think - has but a word for the third person. Those "she" and "he" you fuss about are simply "hän" in Finnish.

There is no "she" or "he" - only hän.

And if you must now, "it" is "se." Meanwhile "se" would never be used for humans, but some excessive dog lover migth use "hän" in substitute for "she" or "he".

All of us Finns are "hän" when referred to in third person.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: No. It is not a general rule. I think you don't understand the concept of individual cases and case by case basis. Each case individually. Death penalty is a drastic measure to the most serious actions. It is a way to guarantee with 100% certainty there will be no repeats. Trust me, many Nazi officers were executed for their actions because the chances of them starting the same shit again were high.

Now, it is not that your values are different, many around here have different values to mine, for example many consider the minimal consenting age in Mexico and Japan too low, I find it just fine.

"The correct neutral is neither he nor she, the correct neutral is it, or if you want to sound a bit confusing, they, I think we have reached an agreement on that. And if I don't like being called a she is because, first, that is a false statement about me, I don't like false statements, second, I use my true name, so nobody could confuse me for a female, there are no women named Leonardo at all, and third, I am not amused with the "preferred pronoun" thing. If you are physically male, you ara a man to me, and I will address you as such, if your screen name is male and I can't see your body I will assume you are male. That is why I said the she was uncalled for, because it was not necessary."

If you think you can go and provoke me you will find yourself in a serious pickle because I am not the kind of man who goes for the low hanging fruit and uses petty insults and threats. I am far worse than that because I refute the arguments I can and use those refuted arguments to prove you are in fact either foolish, insane, a liar, or someone who has been lied to.

PS: And sorry if I think Carlos Salinas should have been killed many times, but after seeing how he fucked, and still fucks my country through proxies, I want him dead.
avatar
TStael: Whether you go on about death penalty or age of consent - I prefer legal principle to case by case, by Scandi and EU morality.

Is this morality tougth? you might ask. Wrong question I think. I simply think human life is invaluable and children should have the rights to be children.

What do you mean? you probaly ask. Let me tell. Human beings are not rid of their lives by the state. And children are not legally copulated with.

What is that hard about morality above? ;-)

And I'd suggest not to try your gender distiction complex with a Finn.

Finnish - with only Turkish I think - has but a word for the third person. Those "she" and "he" you fuss about are simply "hän" in Finnish.

There is no "she" or "he" - only hän.

And if you must now, "it" is "se." Meanwhile "se" would never be used for humans, but some excessive dog lover migth use "hän" in substitute for "she" or "he".

All of us Finns are "hän" when referred to in third person.
But that is not the case in the rest of the world. And when using English we use English grammar, not FInnish.

Second. Again. Minors deserve more agency, freedom, and responsibility than the amount they currently get from "Adults" and the state.
low rated
avatar
TStael: There is no "she" or "he" - only hän.

And if you must now, "it" is "se." Meanwhile "se" would never be used for humans, but some excessive dog lover migth use "hän" in substitute for "she" or "he".

All of us Finns are "hän" when referred to in third person.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: But that is not the case in the rest of the world. And when using English we use English grammar, not FInnish.

Second. Again. Minors deserve more agency, freedom, and responsibility than the amount they currently get from "Adults" and the state.
So when you suggest "it" as it suits you, me pointing out there is more pertinent "hän" - that serves the purpose of human third person, and not "it" - it is a bit unpleasant?

Please.

Tolkien would not go with u there, if it helps you.

And it really seems we do not agree on "minors."

To me child is a child whom should enjoy childhood and family life, and kinder garden most plausibly, and universal education most certainly from age seven up to fifteen.

I appreciate it might be different in Mexico, but also please try and understand when there is no death penalty for the adults, even if you flaunth a really horrible case, there cannot be support for executing children.

And I am not for executing adults either. And am a bit surprised Mexico would really.state.
low rated
My (Finnish) impression has been that Mexico would not be with the capital punishment- had to check to be sure against an authentic opinionon, purportedly, or maybe truly.

Any which way I wish that Mexico could dispense justice without fear or favour. And also that the EU would put better effiort unto MX-EU bilateral relatationship. I am not perso satisfied with EU diplomatic effort at the moment, it seems deeply inwardly twisted. (Am pro EU perso thou)
avatar
TStael: My (Finnish) impression has been that Mexico would not be with the capital punishment- had to check to be sure against an authentic opinionon, purportedly, or maybe truly.

Any which way I wish that Mexico could dispense justice without fear or favour. And also that the EU would put better effiort unto MX-EU bilateral relatationship. I am not perso satisfied with EU diplomatic effort at the moment, it seems deeply inwardly twisted. (Am pro EU perso thou)
EU is a parasite, all foreign intervention in Mexico has resulted in us getting buttfucked. EU, America, they are all parasites. The people is not to blame, but the governments have fucked us. And EU is the worst, they are parasites of the very same nations they represent. If one falls the others are forced to fall with it.
Oh, and yes, I already mentioned death penalty is illegal in Mexico. But Mexicans are not precisely pleased with that.
The only circumstance in which death penalty is legal is "Treason to the nation", and is never applied because Mexicans are cowards. When you live in a first world country with little to no serious threats death penalty sounds insane, but when you live in a place full of atrocious merciless savages who use the people as tools. That is when things get ugly and you need death penalty as punishment for many horrible crimes.

But how could you understand that? You don't read in the news about beheaded civilians hanging on a bridge because they got to close to a gang's turf. That is not how you live. You could not see how much pressure my people take, you don't know why we consider death penalty necessary. We are almost at war. If there is not a civil war is because civilians are not allowed to bear arms due to heave gun control.

It is too easy to apply your own morality to all cases when you are oblivious to other situations.

Back to my point about minors. Where does giving them freedom, agency, and responsibility, based on their needs, and individual maturity, knowledge, achievement, misdeeds, and other related traits of their actions, is at odds with them having a childhood and access to education?

I don't think you are interpreting my arguments correctly and I think you are running in circles trying to attack an argument you are reluctant to understand. I don't think you are not capable of doing so, I think you don't want to do so.
A video about Islamic imperialism.

https://youtu.be/i2xtSUCQWLA
low rated
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: But how could you understand that? You don't read in the news about beheaded civilians hanging on a bridge because they got to close to a gang's turf. That is not how you live. You could not see how much pressure my people take, you don't know why we consider death penalty necessary. We are almost at war. If there is not a civil war is because civilians are not allowed to bear arms due to heave gun control.
The constant atrocities of war lead to such extremist attitudes, we understand that well. The American people have only gotten the teensiest sip of it and are ready to vote for Trump in return, as if that didn't make absolutely all of their problems worse. The Mexicans have gotten way too much and demand the death penalty as if that wiped corruption and drugs away, and the right to bear arms as if that resulted in less gun fights among civilians.

From the perspective of the countries that are better off, it's easy to think "God what stupid and abominable folks are those, they deserve what's coming to them". But they aren't stupid and they aren't abominable. The Mexicans aren't... and in absolutely the same way, the Syrians aren't either.

Extreme social situations – war, bullying, some perceived looming threat to your way of life – makes extremists, and some extremists seize on whatever cultural thing has been the most steady and constant in their life – religion, patriotism, movies, video games – to channel their extremism into terrorist action. Whether policiticans blame the Muslim religion as a whole or video games as a systemic problem, it's the very same communicative strategy of hyperbolic scapegoating in order to oversimplify a complex social problem.

Maybe a thing to think about. As opposed to thinking about some random internet agitator who took up the name of an historical imperialist dictator blabbering about imperialism without an emperor.
low rated
avatar
TStael: My (Finnish) impression has been that Mexico would not be with the capital punishment- had to check to be sure against an authentic opinionon, purportedly, or maybe truly.

Any which way I wish that Mexico could dispense justice without fear or favour. And also that the EU would put better effiort unto MX-EU bilateral relatationship. I am not perso satisfied with EU diplomatic effort at the moment, it seems deeply inwardly twisted. (Am pro EU perso thou)
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: EU is a parasite, all foreign intervention in Mexico has resulted in us getting buttfucked. EU, America, they are all parasites. The people is not to blame, but the governments have fucked us. And EU is the worst, they are parasites of the very same nations they represent. If one falls the others are forced to fall with it.
Oh, and yes, I already mentioned death penalty is illegal in Mexico. But Mexicans are not precisely pleased with that.

But how could you understand that?

I don't think you are interpreting my arguments correctly and I think you are running in circles trying to attack an argument you are reluctant to understand. I don't think you are not capable of doing so, I think you don't want to do so.
If you are asking me for the race to the bottom, Philippines overtook Mexico there - and I do not mean this in a gung-ho manner.

Only I think Philippines ambadassor should have been called in to a diplomatic talk formally in Finland - like Iranian diplomat was asked due to concern of Ali al-Nimr being executed when centenced as a teenager.

I am not pretending to understand, but I also never thought Mexican ambassodor at par with Philippines.

And I do not agree at all with EU being a force for worse, or being very wicked. I am not sure if our Scandi neighbours even care for Fin, but I'd still wish them to be the most successful nations in the world.

I cannot say I know Croatia or Malta very well - for a sake of an example - but I will also want these nations to do well, because this is Europe.

i perso see EU as my Scandi neigbours, or Croatia or Malta, etc - I should like all of them the most successful nation, with mine. But I admit - our Scandi neighbours first if it were so limited! ;-)

It is easy to dismiss EU - when to me it is really about my love of my neighbours, and my wish that all of my continent would do well.
https://twitter.com/HFA/status/772563031716982786

Did the final boss reveal itself?