It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
ryannaughton1138: Yes, because one Youtube video made by a small group of people from a different county is clearly representative the widespread rejection of the great SJW menace.
You mentioned you were ex-GG. But you seem to be pro SJW. So, a bird pooped on my car's windshield. It was patriarchy.
avatar
ryannaughton1138: RWarehail
You say the SJW movment is stupid, and contradictory. Then why do this thread treat them as such a threat when ignoring them would be more productive?
Nazism was stupid and contradictory. No one stopped them. Same with all fascism really.
Post edited November 12, 2015 by Shadowstalker16
Remember that time SJW told Japanese devs to change stuff and they were like "No?"
good times
avatar
dragonbeast: Remember that time SJW told Japanese devs to change stuff and they were like "No?"
good times
Unfortunately SJWs don't know that no means no.
avatar
dragonbeast: Remember that time SJW told Japanese devs to change stuff and they were like "No?"
good times
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Unfortunately SJWs don't know that no means no.
based
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Unfortunately SJWs don't know that no means no.
avatar
dragonbeast: based
You mean games don't cause misogyny? Do you have feelz of the right thinking people to back it up?
avatar
dragonbeast: Remember that time SJW told Japanese devs to change stuff and they were like "No?"
good times
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Unfortunately SJWs don't know that no means no.
Well played, sir.

***LIVE UPDATES*** Campus Crazies on ‘Million Student March’
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/12/live-updates-campus-crazies-on-million-student-march/

SJWs gonna SJW. So basically we've learned that all education should be free, blacks can't be racist, and where's my free Obama phone?

Perot was right. There is a flushing sound, and these kids are the ones jiggling the toilet handle.
avatar
ryannaughton1138: RWarehail
You say the SJW movment is stupid, and contradictory. Then why do this thread treat them as such a threat when ignoring them would be more productive?
Would it though? Academia ignored them & look at the state colleges are in now.
didn't see this linked here yet

<span class="bold">Modern Educayshun</span>
Post edited November 13, 2015 by Rusty_Gunn
low rated
avatar
ryannaughton1138: RWarehail
You say the SJW movment is stupid, and contradictory. Then why do this thread treat them as such a threat when ignoring them would be more productive?
avatar
Rusty_Gunn: Would it though? Academia ignored them & look at the state colleges are in now.
Speaking as someone who went through college, I can safely say they aren't ignored given that quiet a few teachers I've had could be described as being full on SJW(and they were great teachers as well).
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Unfortunately SJWs don't know that no means no.
avatar
Emob78: Well played, sir.

***LIVE UPDATES*** Campus Crazies on ‘Million Student March’
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/12/live-updates-campus-crazies-on-million-student-march/

SJWs gonna SJW. So basically we've learned that all education should be free, blacks can't be racist, and where's my free Obama phone?

Perot was right. There is a flushing sound, and these kids are the ones jiggling the toilet handle.
Generation W for wailing / worthless / welfare / wanting / wimpy.

I wonders where the huge number of internet denizen incapable of logic comes from. Now I know.
avatar
Rusty_Gunn: Would it though? Academia ignored them & look at the state colleges are in now.
avatar
ryannaughton1138: Speaking as someone who went through college, I can safely say they aren't ignored given that quiet a few teachers I've had could be described as being full on SJW(and they were great teachers as well).
And let's be perfectly clear. You are the one mis-attributing my statement. Since you don't ever seem to want to discuss anything, this probably falls on deaf ears, but there is a big difference between seeking social justice and these social justice warriors. I have never called the true pursuit of social justice stupid. I have called some individuals stupid who push their agendas ahead of their own introspection. Or in your case, all you seem to be able to do, is attempt to poke holes and seem to refuse to discuss any actual details about anything.

True social justice is a noble cause. Bringing real equality to the disadvantaged is a good thing. But sadly, most SJWs don't put enough research and thought into their causes. The typical SJW falls for group think and blame, not truth and a consideration of all sides of an issue. To a SJW, it's easy to blame some nebulous patriarchy or Gamergate as if its some sort of evil boogieman.

Real social justice takes care to be precise. The prevailing philosophy of SJWs seem to be more of an "ends justifying the means" craziness. If whites are the enemy, they don't care how much they might suffer as long as minorities gain. They don't care if not all whites were ever "guilty" of the crimes accused. They don't care if being white has nothing to do with it. When men are the enemy, anything that props up women in their book is a good thing. All painting their enemies with a broad brush and promoting their minority.

I stand for social justice, but not this crazy SJW philosophy. I believe too many blacks and Hispanics end up in prison for crimes that most whites would get probation for. I believe the same for "driving while black or Hispanic". It definitely happens. But the solution is not to blame and punish all whites. The solutions start with the root issues, the true issues, issues such as sentencing differences between "crack" cocaine which had greater use among minority populations and powdered cocaine with greater use among richer white populations. You fix the issue by fixing this disparity. You don't just raise prison sentences for whites to make up the difference.

In terms of gaming, especially PC and console gaming, just because more men and boys play computer games and more games are made targeting this demographic, doesn't make it a problem for women. I also don't find it a problem that more men are interested in a career in game programming as a result. Just as I find it no problem that most romance novels are designed for women, written by women and more women are hired to write such novels as more women are interested in that field.

I don't think specific games should be forced to "accommodate" female interests just as I don't think romance novels should be forced to change to appeal more to men. To do so in the name of "equality" is silly in both situations because the interests are not equal. This isn't to say that there should not be games designed by women for women (and there are), and the same goes for LGBT. As I'm sure there is some sort of market for such novels for men. Maybe some of that is the appeal of James Bond. But what doesn't make sense is to shoehorn in every conceivable race and gender to make some sort of silly equality statement. Or trying to make a game or book for everyone. I remember the short-lived TV show Terra Nova. It tried to be the show for everyone. Cute dinosaurs for the kids and family. Spy and espionage and mystery for men. Strong female characters for women. The whole shows was trying to appeal to so many groups that it really failed to appeal to any of them enough to survive.

Let the designers themselves make their games, let them decide who they are targeting and decide with your own wallets. Because frankly, the way the game industry works, if there is a true viable market, they will match it for sales. And if you want more games for women, or LGBT or whatever ethnicity, vote with your wallet by buying the games that appeal to you so more will get made. Crying about the lack of these games, just makes one a crybaby. Supporting a developer, by actually buying the game which is to your liking is the solution. But frankly I think a lot of the SJW movement in videogames is composed of a lot of people who really aren't interested in buying and playing videogames at all. It is an "end to a means". They are only complaining about it, because it serves their cause as many of these people aren't interested in videogames at all. They don't buy the games, its just another piece in some silly gender war...
avatar
noncompliantgame: Just a few bits of info about above mentioned. But it's all tinfoil paranoid fantasy right?

TPP explained

Big Picture (sorry [227])

TPP being fast-tracked

Agenda 2030 (that's the UN name for it)

And is that Joaquim "Commodus" Phoenix in the pic? '...Maximus ... Maximus ... Maximus ... " X-D

They're at their worst when they're policing their own. If there's anything quasi-religious fanatics hate more than unbelievers it's "heretics" within their cult. Check any face book or twit conflicts between sjws - one of them departs from doctrine and its dog-pile, open season, no mercy all around.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: I remember when I questioned a MGTOW because he took the extreme stance of distrusting all women, he called me a feminist. Can you believe that? It is funny to see that sometimes anti SJWs become so fanatic too that they would do the same. Of course it is less common than with SJWs, but still happens. Fanatism is dangerous and unhealthy. As a left leaning friend of mine says. If what you or your group does starts to resemble what religious cults do, it is time to stop and reconsider the path you have taken.

God, I am glad nobody asks me about my stance on the age of consent laws in my country so often or I would have a bounty on my head from both camps.

The fun part is that suddenly my rep went from 22 or 23 to 19 not so long after posting this, and your post, which in my opinion is reasonable, is marked as "Low rated". I bet the downrep ghost is back.
lol I was gonna say, looks like the phantom downrepper is back - il n'est pas Jack (or Jacquelyn) the Repper?. X-D

One should try to take it all as lightly as possible.


EDIT: Which, BTW, the rep is (at least partially) broken. I just up-repped someone and their rep dropped a point ... go figure!?



avatar
Shadowstalker16: Unfortunately SJWs don't know that no means no.
avatar
Emob78: Well played, sir.

***LIVE UPDATES*** Campus Crazies on ‘Million Student March’
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/12/live-updates-campus-crazies-on-million-student-march/

SJWs gonna SJW. So basically we've learned that all education should be free, blacks can't be racist, and where's my free Obama phone?

Perot was right. There is a flushing sound, and these kids are the ones jiggling the toilet handle.
Ooh, they're takin' it to the man. "We're demanding the gov do what it's already doing! That'll show 'em". Que something by Rage Against the Machine ... and everyone, fists in air ... 3, 2, 1, NOW! Take a picture! X-D

The thing is people are getting unhappier all round and these clowns think asking the gov to solve their probs is gonna fix anything.
Post edited November 13, 2015 by noncompliantgame
avatar
RWarehall: I remember the short-lived TV show Terra Nova. It tried to be the show for everyone. Cute dinosaurs for the kids and family. Spy and espionage and mystery for men. Strong female characters for women. The whole shows was trying to appeal to so many groups that it really failed to appeal to any of them enough to survive.
Dammit, I just bought Terra Nova yesterday in a stock clearing sales. I see the pictures and description and bought it without checking the reviews......

Now checking the reviews, I see Whiny Teenage and more Whiny Teenage.

Maybe I should hide it in some hole.
low rated
RWarehall
Ah the "I'm not against Social Justice but..." argument. And you bring up REAL social justice as if what SJWs promote is somehow impure. Also the way talk about how "real social justice is precise" makes society sound like a machine that just needs to fine tuned. It's not. Dealing with things like racism, and sexism can be messy, it can be difficult, and there can be major setbacks.

And for the record no one is trying to force video games to be more inclusive. The games are just being criticized for not being very inclusive. If game developers want to ignore that, fine. But those are taking into account those criticisms aren't doing because they are being pressured by SJWs. They realize that there is more money to be made when you appeal to more than just straight white males. That's not an SJW plot, that is capitalism at work.
avatar
ryannaughton1138: RWarehall
Ah the "I'm not against Social Justice but..." argument. And you bring up REAL social justice as if what SJWs promote is somehow impure. Also the way talk about how "real social justice is precise" makes society sound like a machine that just needs to fine tuned. It's not. Dealing with things like racism, and sexism can be messy, it can be difficult, and there can be major setbacks.

And for the record no one is trying to force video games to be more inclusive. The games are just being criticized for not being very inclusive. If game developers want to ignore that, fine. But those are taking into account those criticisms aren't doing because they are being pressured by SJWs. They realize that there is more money to be made when you appeal to more than just straight white males. That's not an SJW plot, that is capitalism at work.
The problem comes when journalists push these unproven dogmas of inclusion as fact and call everyone who questions the dogmas racist / sexist / spoon etc.

Also, please define ''sexism'' and ''racism'' and such. This isn't like some cancer awareness thing where you share a shit post on social media and feel all fuzzy thinking you're ''raising awareness''. In which avenues do these problems exist and what proof is there that that is caused by external factors?
Post edited November 13, 2015 by Shadowstalker16