noncompliantgame: Just a few bits of info about above mentioned. But it's all tinfoil paranoid fantasy right?
TPP explained Big Picture (sorry [227]) TPP being fast-tracked Agenda 2030 (that's the UN name for it) And is that Joaquim "
Commodus" Phoenix in the pic? '
...Maximus ... Maximus ... Maximus ... " X-D
They're at their worst when they're policing their own. If there's anything quasi-religious fanatics hate more than unbelievers it's "heretics" within their cult. Check any face book or twit conflicts between sjws - one of them departs from doctrine and its dog-pile, open season, no mercy all around.
LeonardoCornejo: I remember when I questioned a MGTOW because he took the extreme stance of distrusting all women, he called me a feminist. Can you believe that? It is funny to see that sometimes anti SJWs become so fanatic too that they would do the same. Of course it is less common than with SJWs, but still happens. Fanatism is dangerous and unhealthy. As a left leaning friend of mine says. If what you or your group does starts to resemble what religious cults do, it is time to stop and reconsider the path you have taken.
God, I am glad nobody asks me about my stance on the age of consent laws in my country so often or I would have a bounty on my head from both camps.
The fun part is that suddenly my rep went from 22 or 23 to 19 not so long after posting this, and your post, which in my opinion is reasonable, is marked as "Low rated". I bet the downrep ghost is back.
You're committing the unforgivable sin of thinking for yourself. Individualism is a mortal enemy to those who support group think. Think about political correctness for a second. Someone might say, 'it's not ok to call that person that name. We know it's wrong to do so.' Ah... so many problems with that concept. Most importantly, who's WE? Exactly which man (or woman) passed the mandate for that new social rule? Who designs the rules for what and isn't acceptable to call someone or how to view others? At least religious nuts have an invisible man up in the clouds to follow. Political correctness dictates just like religion, but without any moral compass or even set tablet of laws. It's hard and fast rules, dictated by whichever loud mouthed, thin skinned college kid happens to embrace it at the moment. Essentially, political correctness is a nebulous mixed bag of hysteria, jumbled concepts, and subjective opinions - all blendered up and meant to masquerade as concrete truths. And if you oppose that, you can be ridiculed today... who knows, maybe even sent to prison for it one day. The ministry of truth is being built as we speak.
That left leaning friend of yours is actually quite correct. Our ability to think for ourselves becomes mired in slogans, group memberships, and personal and professional compromises. Usually when we find our viewpoint or lifestyle being imprinted on others and great success happening, that's when we need to step back and wonder if maybe... just maybe we had to step on someone else's shoes to get to our lofty heights, or maybe that by exercising our own liberties, we ended up sacrificing someone else's.
We can find peace in that when we know that at the very least we thought for ourselves and tried to do what was right. Most people would just assume that to be an obvious statement, but in fact introspection is probably more rare than we think. I think most SJWs probably think they're doing the right thing, but many of them lack the ability to analyze or critique it in any way, mainly because there's an epidemic of people who suffer from having very little SELF-AWARENESS. We're dangerously close to having a quasi-religious/political cult on our hands, especially with these armies of impressionable youth. When spouting rhetoric and fighting on the internet, we tend to laugh it off. God help us when/if these people ever get real power one day. Utopias can turn into Dystopias pretty fast.
