RawSteelUT: It DOES sort of come across at first blush as a preachier version of
Papers, Please. Can anyone here who's played it attest to how heavy-handed it is or isn't?
That's sort of the problem with the far-left/far-right culture warriors and their attempts to make entertainment. They're so fixated on pushing a narrative that they can't make engaging entertainment. The
God's Not Dead movies and
Ghostbusters 2016 come across that way, for example. It's fine to be political, but I don't think anyone really responds one way or the other to a heavy-handed approach.
It's honestly a fun game (bear in mind, I'm only 3h in, maybe it turns bad later); the document checking mechanics is similar to papers, please - start with only "kids gotta be 18+ to go into club" and then "check for fake, fuck France because they're terrorists, you need ticket, take care of VIP line and guest line"; just like in papers, please, there are little advancements towards making your life as bouncer easier (keyboard shortcuts to turn pages in guest list, alphabetical order, etc). There's political situation going on in the background, but I can't comment on that (yet).
There are several problems I have with the game right now; unlike in papers, please, NOTHING pauses passing time; it means that you might not be able to hit bonus goal (i.e. let 15 people in, 20 for a bonus, 25 for a bigger one) because of three fakes in a row and people telling you how mean you are. Or VIPs not saying the correct password and you're not able to hit VIP goal for the night because there was just not enough VIPs. It's still rather easy to make money but it's not a game mechanic that should prevent you from hitting target goals.
reative00: Damn, GoG, this guy is right. You should drop all political games from your catalog. Let's see...
Fallout. Morrowind. Wolfenstein. Witcher. Kingdom Come. Frostpunk. Dragon Age. Stronghold Crusader. VtMB. Ultimate General. Gothic. KotOR. Metro. Mafia.
You know what, it's page six and I got bored. Could you just remove all the games? Thanks!
Spectre: Someone doesn't know the difference between games which may have vague political elements as part of the gameworld compared to other games which have it as the main focus of the game, or as outrage marketing or as some kind of pandering to
those indie game types.
Oh, I do know the difference; I just don't see why you should be the one making that distinction. I see all games with political elements as pure propaganda and I demand they shall be banned.
Also, do you have loicense to post in this thread?
Telika: I remember the days of "
it's just a game, dude, why don't snowflakes have any humour" followed with "
help, sjw and feminazi want to censor videogames". A rhetoric that already wasn't fooling that many people. And now, from the same dudes, we have all the "
how dare you, HOW DARE YOU sell this game". With a third layer in the form of "
help, I am being censored, censorship is a bad thing again".
The main thing these forums lack is the benny hill tune auto-playing in the background.
Damn game developers and their...
*shuffle deck*
*picks card*
story ideas.
Seriously tho, can't we just not have censorship in games. I don't care at all if some asshats are making "feminazi the triggering"; looking at screenshots and review section it's an absolute garbage and if someone is going to make painful playthrough just because it fits their political narrative... Well, good luck to them!