It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Not Tonight is now available DRM-free on GOG.com, 10% off until August 24th, 3 PM UTC.

Great Britain isn’t so great anymore. Democracy lies in ruins. The power of the people is just a myth. You find yourself fighting to scrape by, every struggle has an end, but Not Tonight.

Not Tonight combines time management with RPG elements, all baked into a politically charged story. Your choices matter, so keep your head down and exist or fight the regime.
avatar
LiefLayer: Actually, they already said:
https://steamcommunity.com/app/850060/discussions/0/2828702372997629968/
that they would like to release it on gog.

What's so special? They are great games, made by 3 people but really ambitious. Some little bugs are understandable for big games made by few people, and we are still talking about little bugs, not game breaking bugs.

I bought the first one here on gog, but the second one right now it's only on steam... A quality game is not here but "Not tonight" a shitty 8-bit game (there are a 1000000 out there) made for propaganda is here on gog.
Thanks for posting that!

Not Tonight looks to be garbage, but I wasn't going to complain about it. However, if GOG is accepting this crap while rejecting the new Anima game, I'll join you in saying that's utterly ridiculous.

The Nameless Chronicles would be an instabuy for me.
To GOG:
This is not the first and possibly not the last release where people with an agenda ruin the real reviews of a game - e.g. think of visual novels, and hidden object games as recent examples.

I think the problem with owning a game on Steam and posting a review here can be easily solved:
Use the GOG connect check.
Have 3 kind of reviews:
1, List owners of the game on GOG as a priority. e.g. plenty of older games do not work properly or at all on Steam, that do work on GOG thanks to fixes. Games like that tend to get very negative reviews, but it has nothing to do with the game itself... and unfortunately the opposite is sometimes true as well, some games do not get the updates here, hence the experience can be rather different to a properly up to date version of the game.
Regardless of what happens, the net result is that GOG buyers should be primarily interested in what legit owners of the GOG release of a game think.
2, Make adding a review optional for people who can confirm using GOG Connect that they do own the game own Steam (not sure if playtime could be checked as well, but would be useful).
These reviews should be optional to view.
3, For "strictly old games" accept any reviews, but mark them as ownership not verified. Ie any recent game should be owned on either major storefront, as otherwise the review is either fake, or the owner has a non-legit copy. We really shouldn't care about either case...
These reviews should be optional to view.
4, For new games do not accept any reviews without proof of ownership.

Enjoy legit reviews on GOG :)
Post edited August 18, 2018 by IFW
avatar
IFW: Enjoy :)
Pretty sure the people posting those "reviews" don't own the game on Steam either.
avatar
IFW: Enjoy :)
avatar
tinyE: Pretty sure the people posting those "reviews" don't own the game on Steam either.
That's exactly my point.
They won't be able to post a review here then, because it's a new game.
avatar
tinyE: Pretty sure the people posting those "reviews" don't own the game on Steam either.
Fun fact : the game received a " very positive " on Steam .
avatar
IFW: 3, For "strictly old games" accept any reviews, but mark them as ownership not verified. Ie any recent game should be owned on either major storefront, as otherwise the review is either fake, or the owner has a non-legit copy. We really shouldn't care about either case...
That's really not true, you know ? Many games are sold DRM-free outside of GOG (and, of course, Steam). Many games on Humble, for instance, can be downloaded directly without redeeming the Steam key. And others can be bought DRM-free on their own individual websites.

No GOG DRM-free monopoly. And that wouldn't even be the point. The "drm-free revolution" (yah, I know, it's really going great isn't it) was supposed to be only spearheaded by GOG.
avatar
tinyE: Pretty sure the people posting those "reviews" don't own the game on Steam either.
avatar
i_hope_you_rot: Fun fact : the game received a " very positive " on Steam .
*ahem* :P
Attachments:
reviews.png (363 Kb)
avatar
tinyE: *ahem* :P
I said the game not that crap .
avatar
tinyE: Pretty sure the people posting those "reviews" don't own the game on Steam either.
avatar
i_hope_you_rot: Fun fact : the game received a " very positive " on Steam .
Because the reviews are from actual owners of the game...
I can't comment on the game yet (sorry, but GOG bled my wallet dry and the SEVEN sale was the final straw), but I'll definitely buy it and check it out eventually for what it is for real, and have a good laugh - fingers crossed :)

avatar
IFW: 3, For "strictly old games" accept any reviews, but mark them as ownership not verified. Ie any recent game should be owned on either major storefront, as otherwise the review is either fake, or the owner has a non-legit copy. We really shouldn't care about either case...
avatar
Telika: That's really not true, you know ? Many games are sold DRM-free outside of GOG (and, of course, Steam). Many games on Humble, for instance, can be downloaded directly without redeeming the Steam key. And others can be bought DRM-free on their own individual websites.

No GOG DRM-free monopoly. And that wouldn't even be the point. The "drm-free revolution" (yah, I know, it's really going great isn't it) was supposed to be only spearheaded by GOG.
99% of my Humble purchases come with a Steam key.
If I were really that hell bent on posting a review about a game here, I'd just activate the key - those keys are meant for complimenting your offline installer on Humble anyway, not for resale...
Post edited August 18, 2018 by IFW
avatar
IFW: Because the reviews are from actual owners of the game...
Exactly .
avatar
tinyE: *ahem* :P
avatar
i_hope_you_rot: I said the game not that crap .
I happen to have that crap wishlisted. :P

as for this game, I have to pass, because regardless of it's subtext, it's too damn smart for me. Anything more complicated than Pac Man and my brain shuts down.
Graphics look a bit better then papers please ( never played the papers please)
price is a little high but that problem has been solved for me already:

Minimum system requirements - Windows: 8 or later
Processor: 1.5 GHz Core2Duo
Memory: 2 GB RAM
Graphics: Nvidia Geforce GT 430/equivalent or higher
DirectX: Version 10
Storage: 2 GB available space

Recommended system requirements - Windows: 10
Processor: Intel Core i5
Memory: 4 GB RAM
Graphics: Nvidia Geforce GTX 560/equivalent or higher
DirectX: Version 11
Storage: 2 GB available space
welldone developers .... no win7 support :D

If more devs do this i will save cash which is good , and if all devs develop in win 8x or 10 only i will save lots of cash and will be able to afford a new PC :D
Post edited August 18, 2018 by gamesfreak64
Looks like they cleaned out the troll reviews.

Problem is now we have the deal with the forum being spammed by people screaming "censorship!"
avatar
IFW: 3, For "strictly old games" accept any reviews, but mark them as ownership not verified. Ie any recent game should be owned on either major storefront, as otherwise the review is either fake, or the owner has a non-legit copy. We really shouldn't care about either case...
avatar
Telika: That's really not true, you know ? Many games are sold DRM-free outside of GOG (and, of course, Steam). Many games on Humble, for instance, can be downloaded directly without redeeming the Steam key. And others can be bought DRM-free on their own individual websites.

No GOG DRM-free monopoly. And that wouldn't even be the point. The "drm-free revolution" (yah, I know, it's really going great isn't it) was supposed to be only spearheaded by GOG.
True, many games even on steam are drm free , well in a way they are drm free cause you do need a client to get the game to download ( forced clients is a form of DRM) on the pc, and the games are not really drm free cause you will need to put some file in it, there is a topic in GOG forum that shows how it involves a text file, doesnt work for every steam game cause many games simply check for the client and if it is running.....
avatar
Telika: That's really not true, you know ? Many games are sold DRM-free outside of GOG (and, of course, Steam). Many games on Humble, for instance, can be downloaded directly without redeeming the Steam key. And others can be bought DRM-free on their own individual websites.

No GOG DRM-free monopoly. And that wouldn't even be the point. The "drm-free revolution" (yah, I know, it's really going great isn't it) was supposed to be only spearheaded by GOG.
avatar
gamesfreak64: True, many games even on steam are drm free , well in a way they are drm free cause you do need a client to get the game to download ( forced clients is a form of DRM) on the pc, and the games are not really drm free cause you will need to put some file in it, there is a topic in GOG forum that shows how it involves a text file, doesnt work for every steam game cause many games simply check for the client and if it is running.....
But even DRM-free games on Steam would be bought through the Steam account, so could be checked "connect"-like to authorise reviews on gog.com. In this context, the issue was more about other shops, that wouldn't be checked by a "reviews enabler".