It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
agentcarr16: @ Krypsyn did your role PM say whether you would kill yourself if you missed a vig shot, or would you just miss and have to try again another night?
No. The reason I am incompetent is that my eyesight is bad, so I often miss what I am shooting at.
I am not sure I believe Leonard's claim. How is this a good thing for town to have? It is a role that can not be 100 percent proven to be true. If he is investigated and comes back scum then he says well it wasn't me it bounced onto someone else.
avatar
cristigale: @Leonard – I asked earlier, but I’ll rephrase the question. Do you see a difference between your contributions so far in this game and the last one? From my perspective it’s noticeably different. I’m curious as to why. Speculating on roles and how they work is interesting, but it does little to help find scum. That’s the only thing I saw you contribute prior to being called on it. At least in the past 24 you’ve provided some thoughts on players. When trying to account for the difference, I keep coming back to – scum struggling to post.

When it comes to the subject of lynching lurkers, I’m much more concerned in the overall quality of posts, not the quantity.

I find it strange that your PM does not explain why you are a Nexus. But I also don’t want to be too quick to fault you for something that could be outside of your control. I remember how hesitant ddickinson(?) was to share her flubb-generated name in the milk game. I do find interesting that this role is considered to more likely hurt town if the player is town and more likely help scum if the player is scum. If you are town, revealing may have been the most town thing you could do.
If you look at the start of last game though, I would expect its the same. Compared to the recent part I last game? Definitely different, I had some ideas then.
I really, truly have no other flavour, when I said even Vitek commented on it I wasn't joking. He stated in the PM that it was bad. What would you write for a Nexus though? I don't know when something is redirected and neither does the redirecti. How could you describe that in the flavour?
avatar
yogsloth: I see it's your first game of Forum Mafia.
Really?!? Oh. Wow. OK...

avatar
yogsloth: Please explain to me how these two sentences are not mutually exclusive.
Ummm... I can't.
Right after I posted that, I realized just how stupid it sounds.

vote Leonard03

avatar
yogsloth: Man, and I thought I wasn't paying close enough attention!
Well... In my defence, his PM doesn't say whether he would kill himself if he missed a shot, and I can't know if Krypsyn posted his exact PM, or just a paraphrase. *whiny tone* I just wanted to make sure.

avatar
Krypsyn: No. The reason I am incompetent is that my eyesight is bad, so I often miss what I am shooting at.
Alright, so you were the NK. Good to know.
avatar
agentcarr16: Leonard has still been a lurker for most of the game, offering no good content and nothing to get a read on.
Ok, I'm getting tired of this "no good content" thing. Look, what has everybody else accomplished so far? We lynched a trainee doctor (ya I'm including myself there, I though he was scum, and would have voted if there came a deadline). Whoop de do. You know what that means? For all the info thrown out and posted there hasn't been any real good content. More doesnt equal better.

@Sage I know it's a bad role for town, I didn't pick it though ;)
avatar
Leonard03: What would you write for a Nexus though? I don't know when something is redirected and neither does the redirecti. How could you describe that in the flavour?
I can think of a few off the top of my head, honestly.

avatar
agentcarr16: I can't know if Krypsyn posted his exact PM
Well, exact quoting would very much be against the rules. However, to clarify, I haven't looked at my PM in over a week, so what I wrote is paraphrased from memory.
avatar
agentcarr16: Alright, so you were the NK. Good to know.
For sake of nitpicking, we don't know it absolutely, but imo we've settled in that there's no viable evidence to support alternate explanations at this time. Occam's razor and all.

I confess I'm a bit surprised Leon is claiming "No flavor" at all. I will, however, disclose something. I would have found it viable if he'd said his role and flavor were not related.

This is not a role claim by any stretch, and for this discussion I'm treating vanilla as a role, but I would say my flavor and my role aren't directly related to each other- or at least you have to make a significant leap from one to the other.

Am I saying I have a role? No, I'm saying mine is one of these three basic possibilities:
1) weak flavor + strong role. Example might be "total loser" + town ninja!
2) strong flavor + weak/no role. Example might be famous martial arts expert + vanilla
3) largely unrelated flavor/role. Example might be "street sweeper" + "town ninja."

I originally made a joke there about accountants, but deleted it lest I get all the other accountants in the game against me. Anyway, point is, if you had to justify how they were related, I guess you could find a meandering path. But you wouldn't see my flavor and say "role must be X!"

My flavor does, however, and this is absolutely true, say that I'm popular and well-liked in town, and that I like the town. It also doesn't say how long I've been there, though the implication is a number of years. There's no mention of any other cities/towns outside of this one. Happy?

While some people may be seeing tidbits that imply there's some sort of cohesive narrative (Kryp's role and flavor, e.g), there's tons of evidence to the contrary. You don't have to see my role/flavor to confirm that- and again, vanilla would be a role and this isn't a role claim - just look at what Sage says her power is:

She convinces people to move back to town. For a day. Then they disappear into the ether.

I mean, if you really take that literally and assuming it's meaningful narrative then you end up with crazy theories like agentcarr's that "maybe she is town or scum dragging their souls off to hell after pretending to be nice!" rather than just the obvious fact that the narrative flavor is a nice colorful touch to the game, but of no practical value at all.

Just my opinion.
avatar
Leonard03: Ok, I'm getting tired of this "no good content" thing. Look, what has everybody else accomplished so far? We lynched a trainee doctor (ya I'm including myself there, I though he was scum, and would have voted if there came a deadline). Whoop de do. You know what that means? For all the info thrown out and posted there hasn't been any real good content. More doesnt equal better.
Wow... Cool your jets, Leonard.

We (I'm talking collectively, though I'm not including all players) have been trying to post content, whatever we've been coming up wtih. Somewhere down the road, posts like this or this or this might come in useful. Your particular contributions, like this and this are not going to be useful. Plain and Simple.
Yes, I deliberately chose your less-useful posts to make my point, but it wasn't difficult to find posts that were useless.

avatar
bler144: you end up with crazy theories like agentcarr's that "maybe she is town or scum dragging their souls off to hell after pretending to be nice!"
Yes. Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I love making up stuff like this. I don't believe a word of what I'm saying, but it's fun coming up with crazy theories.
Does anyone know when our next vote count comes?
avatar
agentcarr16: Yes. Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I love making up stuff like this. I don't believe a word of what I'm saying, but it's fun coming up with crazy theories.
If Vitek's write-up of Kryp's passing is that his corpse was found drained of blood and with his brains sucked out his nose, you've got my backing for a wagon on Sage the horrible brain vampire who, for whatever reason, publicly claimed responsibility in advance.

The sad thing is, this game is so weird that now you actually have me wondering if it's going to happen. G'dammit. ;)
avatar
bler144: If Vitek's write-up of Kryp's passing is that his corpse was found drained of blood and with his brains sucked out his nose, you've got my backing for a wagon on Sage the horrible brain vampire who, for whatever reason, publicly claimed responsibility in advance.

The sad thing is, this game is so weird that now you actually have me wondering if it's going to happen. G'dammit. ;)
It could all be a conspiracy, and Krypsyn didn't actually die. It's just that his power makes him look like he dies, and he can then return to the game at any point and begin voting again. Then Sage claimed responsibility because if she survives to the third day, she does become a brain vampire, and her win condition changes to lover-survivor, meaning the brain vampire and zombie Krypsyn must be two of the last three people alive.

Of course, my saying it blows their cover wide open, but I've kept it all under my hat for long enough :P
avatar
agentcarr16: but it wasn't difficult to find posts that were useless.
Glad I made it easy for you.
avatar
agentcarr16: but it wasn't difficult to find posts that were useless.
avatar
Leonard03: Glad I made it easy for you.
See what I mean.
Get caught up in RL for awhile and come back and all kinds of interesting happenings going on. What jumps out to me right now is CSPVG and his comment in this post.

You said you did not want to call Leonard's bluff. A bluff would entail that leonard is being deceitful yet you remove your vote.

You explain removing the vote "Yes, I know that I've just said that I'm not willing to move my vote, but he did claim and did so in a way that makes it very hard to question him. "

So you say he is bluffing and because of that you think it's best to not question him and remove your vote? This is confusing. If you believe someone is being deceitful you should absolutely question them and vote them.

I am trying to think of a reason why someone would remove a vote on someone else they think is being deceitful, still can't think of one.
avatar
trentonlf: I am trying to think of a reason why someone would remove a vote on someone else they think is being deceitful, still can't think of one.
Not a legitimate one, at any rate. ;)