It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
badon: I have read the book Contact, and seen the movies. It's my favorite bit of sci-fi.
avatar
tinyE: AMAZING BOOK.
The movie was good but I didn't like some of the changes. I realize they had to alter somethings because the book was over 1000 pages, but all together brilliant stuff from a brilliant mind who is and will be missed.
I have not read the book, but I could not get through the movie. I found the whole religion vs science thing heavy handed and annoying and I absolutely could not stand Mcconaughey's character.

Also, everybody, please stop feeding that trolling asshat. You're not going to get through to him. You're just giving him the opportunity to vomit more misogynistic nonsense all over the thread.
Post edited June 03, 2018 by Breja
avatar
tinyE: AMAZING BOOK.
The movie was good but I didn't like some of the changes. I realize they had to alter somethings because the book was over 1000 pages, but all together brilliant stuff from a brilliant mind who is and will be missed.
avatar
Breja: Mcconaughey's character.
THAT IS THE ONE major change from the book to the movie I couldn't stand.

Palmer Joss in the movie and in the book are totally totally different and there is no stupid romance. They really screwed up with that.
avatar
tinyE:
avatar
Breja: Also, everybody, please stop feeding that trolling asshat. You're not going to get through to him. You're just giving him the opportunity to vomit more misogynistic nonsense all over the thread.
AND JUST ONE MORE! :P

This is for you Socratatus!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okp_A1HqY08
Post edited June 03, 2018 by tinyE
I freaking love Excalibur.
avatar
Socratatus: I give my father`s advice to you. Stop being a weak pussy. You as a male are far stronger, but you`ve let yourself become mentally weak.
Post edited June 03, 2018 by LootHunter
low rated
avatar
Breja: Also, everybody, please stop feeding that trolling asshat. You're not going to get through to him. You're just giving him the opportunity to vomit more misogynistic nonsense all over the thread.
A misogynist for telling truth and reality? Do you enjoy labelling people so you can hate them? You`re a misandrist. Yea I can insult too since that`s where you`ve taken it.

Yknow I thought Polish men actually had some balls. The ones I live with certainly know the difference between men and women.
Post edited June 03, 2018 by Socratatus
avatar
Breja:
avatar
Socratatus: Do you enjoy labelling people so you can hate them?
You just called me a "weak ass guy" and a "weak pussy". XD

And now you've turned to racism. True colors.

I wonder how big and tough you'd be if you had to squeeze the something the size of a watermelon out a hole the size of a lemon. I wonder how feeble and weak you'd consider women o be then.
Post edited June 03, 2018 by tinyE
low rated
avatar
Socratatus: Do you enjoy labelling people so you can hate them?
avatar
tinyE: You just called me a "weak ass guy" and a "weak pussy". XD

And now you've turned to racism. True colors.

I wonder how big and tough you'd be if you had to squeeze the something the size of a watermelon out a hole the size of a lemon. I wonder how feeble and weak you'd consider women o be then.
I`m trying to get you to have some balls.

ps. If you are male, and If you want a girlfriend, if you want to be happy, you gotta stop whiteknighting for girls and sucking up to them. They won`t like you more, in fact they`ll despise you.

Have respect for yourself and stop just jumping in with what looks like the `good` crowd to you.
Post edited June 03, 2018 by Socratatus
avatar
Breja: Also, everybody, please stop feeding that trolling asshat. You're not going to get through to him. You're just giving him the opportunity to vomit more misogynistic nonsense all over the thread.
You're right.
Classic inferiority complex compensating by degrading others... That guy should get professional treatment.
avatar
badon: I have read the book Contact, and seen the movies. It's my favorite bit of sci-fi.
avatar
tinyE: AMAZING BOOK.
The movie was good but I didn't like some of the changes. I realize they had to alter somethings because the book was over 1000 pages, but all together brilliant stuff from a brilliant mind who is and will be missed.

And to the point dt was trying to make, it's a very down to earth realistic scifi story. While I don't see us getting blue prints from outer space any time soon, it does such a great job of taking this extraordinary story and making it "real". Star Trek always dealt with real people and real emotions and real dilemmas, but at the end of the day they were still on a space ship going warp speed which accentuated the Fantasy over the Science in SciFi. Contact very much leans to the Science aspect of it, allowing for some Fantasy, but almost as just a garnish, not a main aspect or story point.
In other words, it has the science in sciensce fiction. Most of what passes as sci-fi probably ought tto be called science fantasy.
avatar
badon: Most of what passes as sci-fi probably ought tto be called science fantasy.
Fantasy IS fiction, and fiction might be fantasy.
e.g. colonising a moon of Jupiter in the future is more likely than the existence of orcs and goblins - still, currently, they're both not real.
Post edited June 03, 2018 by teceem
avatar
tinyE: AMAZING BOOK.
The movie was good but I didn't like some of the changes. I realize they had to alter somethings because the book was over 1000 pages, but all together brilliant stuff from a brilliant mind who is and will be missed.

And to the point dt was trying to make, it's a very down to earth realistic scifi story. While I don't see us getting blue prints from outer space any time soon, it does such a great job of taking this extraordinary story and making it "real". Star Trek always dealt with real people and real emotions and real dilemmas, but at the end of the day they were still on a space ship going warp speed which accentuated the Fantasy over the Science in SciFi. Contact very much leans to the Science aspect of it, allowing for some Fantasy, but almost as just a garnish, not a main aspect or story point.
avatar
badon: In other words, it has the science in sciensce fiction. Most of what passes as sci-fi probably ought tto be called science fantasy.
What about Jurassic Park? It also has robust science (the book at least).
avatar
badon: In other words, it has the science in sciensce fiction. Most of what passes as sci-fi probably ought tto be called science fantasy.
avatar
LootHunter: What about Jurassic Park? It also has robust science (the book at least).
Pretty much goes for all Crichton (spell) books. The movies are obviously aimed for a wider audience and so they "action" it up a little, minus the ones he directed which, let's be honest, are boring to watch. :P The Andromeda Strain is a great read and it's fun to follow these people do their lab work, but waching it is pretty dull.
avatar
badon: In other words, it has the science in sciensce fiction. Most of what passes as sci-fi probably ought tto be called science fantasy.
avatar
LootHunter: What about Jurassic Park? It also has robust science (the book at least).
It's probably no coincidence both movies came out close to the same time. It was a good time for sci-fi movies.
avatar
Socratatus: Men are not only stronger, but even the smallest man has a greater muscle density and mass weight for weight than women. Men are also faster than women. There`s more, but I`ll leave you with that.

Ergo a warrior will always beat a woman in real combat.

I haven`t read the Witcher novels, but that is HIS fantasy world. From the game it`s not too bad, but I think that Ciri woman was a mistake.The series was good until she popped up with her super powers. She is too much like the Witcher and seems to me just a shoe horn for feminism- again. That said I haven`t completed the whole game, or book so maybe she`ll turn out less of a feminist character.
avatar
toxicTom: That's IMO really bulllshit. The first part objectively is. Men have on average more muscle mass and density - yes. On average. Meaning there are a lot of women out there your will beat an average man is terms of power and speed any time.

And speaking of Ciri, you should really read the books. She has received Witcher training (without the mutations) which already puts her in the top 10 percent of trained warriors in the world. And the rest - (superhuman speed and stuff - her abilities in the game) is explained thoroughly in the novels.

Also Sapkowski's stories are full of strong and independent women - yes. But at least half of them are pretty vile and vain - men are just more crude in their methods to gain power most of the time.
Did someone say "Ciri"?
Attachments:
avatar
toxicTom: That's IMO really bulllshit. The first part objectively is. Men have on average more muscle mass and density - yes. On average. Meaning there are a lot of women out there your will beat an average man is terms of power and speed any time.

And speaking of Ciri, you should really read the books. She has received Witcher training (without the mutations) which already puts her in the top 10 percent of trained warriors in the world. And the rest - (superhuman speed and stuff - her abilities in the game) is explained thoroughly in the novels.

Also Sapkowski's stories are full of strong and independent women - yes. But at least half of them are pretty vile and vain - men are just more crude in their methods to gain power most of the time.
avatar
TARFU: Did someone say "Ciri"?
Who wins, Ciri or my girl?