From the same article:
"What we have as the slogan of our studio is that 'we are rebels'," he said. "Rebels, underdogs - I think it's a state of mind. The moment we start becoming conservative [and] stop taking creative risks and business risks, and stop being true to what we're doing, that's when we should worry. And I am not worried. Our values and our care for what we are doing and - hopefully what gamers would agree with - care for gamers is what drives this company forward. Whether we are big or small, we have a multiplatform open-world game or just a PC release, the game and our deeds are what counts, not the fact that we are perceived by some as the big guys.
"It's my personal horror to become a faceless behemoth of game development or publishing or whatnot," he added. "As long as I am here I will be fighting for this not to happen."
Okay. So GOG with sometimes strained support, sometimes lacking communication and hundreds of thousands of users of Galaxy is a rebelic underdog and not a faceless behemoth? Hmm. I guess one can also do too much wishful thinking. Probably they are a bit of both.
CDP is partly like the big ones and why should it not? I think that in principle their business model is compatible with the model of bigger companies like EA. After all Valve is also much bigger and even the market leader and still Valve does new things and keeps doing risky things regularly.