Wizardry: As a part of Brooks' series of films, it was a negative sign of things to come, and as a film on it's own it's an immature piece of comedy relying on simplistic slapstick humour. There are worse films out there (Brooks' "Robin Hood: Men In Tights" for one), but that doesn't give "Spaceballs" an excuse for what it is. "Spaceballs", put simply, is a film that every child will love, but which eventually we will all grow out of.
spindown: Thank you, finally a sane person. I've never understood why this cheap piece of childish slapstick humor is considered a cult classic by so many people. I actually find it embarrassing to watch.
You two lack a sense of humor, for one. Just because one "grows up" one doesn't necessarily have to "outgrow" the films they loved as a child.
========================
Anyone noticing the pattern here? In that most here seem to loves films from their age and not much from other ages. It seems as we get older we fail to enjoy the films of later ages as time goes on, or disregard those of previous ages in some cases. I know there are exceptions, iot just irks me is all, to see nostalgia goggles get in the way of having fun watching more movies or enjoying them/etc.
I mean I like the old SW trilogy, the cheesiness of total recall, the slapstick of Spaceballs, the newer stuff like SW Phantom Menace & AVP 1/2, etc. IMO, making films more action filled doesn't mean I automatically give them bad marks, and I don't give all films from my era and before a free pass either. I weigh each on how it plays out, even if it doesn't mesh totally with others in it's series.