It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
ceemdee: You could get over it by pretending it's a game and stare at people until they get uncomfortable enough to look away and then silently declare yourself the winner. Of course that probably wouldn't help you socially...

The 4 Hour Work Week book recommends that. Start with women and kids. ;-)
The author reckons it's a good way to get over your fears of uncomfortable things... (which means you can then start to make the important but difficult decisions, instead of procrastinating... that being the focus of that particular book).
avatar
frostcircus: OK, this ended up as a ridiculous hijack of Aliasalpha's thread, so I've decided not to inflict it on him and to instead give it its own topic. It's probably TL;DR (hard to tell in this tiny window), but maybe someone will read it and weigh in.
those socially less agile (i.e. people like us)

Honestly? I think this is a myth, though of course I can only speak for myself. I believed it for a long time, and perhaps it was true once, but upon taking a step back and observing myself, it definitely isn't now: I can hold my own in a conversation with anybody who's willing to actually have one, I have no problem speaking my mind, and I can even disagree with people's base beliefs without them feeling attacked. I think that's fairly agile, and while the internet and real life are not the same thing, I see a lot of these traits in people here.
Contrary to how it may look, most 'normal' people are surprisingly socially inept. They almost never make connections with one another - most of their 'main event' socialising consists of getting as wasted as possible, which helps them gather stories they can tell to one another. That's it. That's what passes for social interaction. It's the most simple process imaginable, and I flatly refuse to believe that anybody 'like us' couldn't pull it off if they wanted to.
Of course, despite my "wait, I actually interact pretty well" epiphany, I still have little to no social life - but I now take the rather arrogant stance that this is not because I'm somehow 'faulty,' but because most 'normal' people are lazy, weak and, frankly, boring. Theirs is the path of least resistance, and I refuse to label myself as somehow 'antisocial' because of this. That is an easy, common mistake to make.
The irony is that I am pretty much miserable pretty much all of the time, so I'm not actually going to give any advice on how to cheer up, because it's a skill I haven't mastered at all. But hopefully I can stop a few people (including AA?) from buying into this myth. I know first-hand that it can lead to completely misplaced self-loathing.
Okay, meandering off-topic ramble ends here, otherwise I'll start going on about 'pseudohedonism,' and breaking my 'stop abusing quotemarks' promise into even more tiny little pieces.

I think the points you raise here are excellent and are indicative of a fundamental lack of understanding of introverts.
This is a link to one of the few pieces of non-Shakespearean writing that has had a real effect on me and actually changed the way I view myself
http://www.jonathanrauch.com/jrauch_articles/caring_for_your_introvert/
Apparently the amount of web traffic this generated for the newspaper it was printed in was higher than any other article before or since, so much so that they did a follow up interview about it
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200602u/introverts
I’ve actually realised over the last few years that I actually have excellent social skills. During my training at TAFE (Tech college), I had to give numerous presentations and do simulated tech support and after getting over the initial resistance to it (which I still have), I ended up doing extremely well. We videoed our major project presentations and as I watched them back both in editing and after I graduated, I was amazed at this guy who looked like me but was able to enthusiastically and energetically command the audience. Sure I needed an hour or 2 of silent solitude to recover from it but I got distinctions and that was all that mattered in the end.
Much the same seems true of my time at uni, particularly in my writing classes I have a tendency to command the room when I speak and I can adapt quickly to changes in discussions and give relevant and reasoned contributions to the conversation.
Overall I’d say my social skills are pretty damned good. What I really need now is characters of a high enough level that I can give them quests... oh damn, that’s another issue, if I ever find girls who are into games, it’s pretty much going to be one of 2 things, WoW or Peggle, both of which I hate.
avatar
frostcircus: now take the rather arrogant stance that this is not because I'm somehow 'faulty,' but because most 'normal' people are lazy, weak and, frankly, boring.

The dark side is strong in you, a powerful sith you will become... Needless to say I agree with you there, there’s a certain point where it’s just not cost effective to try with people unless they show some sign of being better than average. At the risk of harping on about it, I think this is another introvert/extrovert thing.
Most of the intro’s I’ve met have had the capacity, and far more importantly the INTEREST, to hold long discussions on a topic, drilling down to get to the meat of the matter and each coming away with something significant. By sharp contrast, most of the extro’s I’ve known have mostly been interested in talking about the footy. Their idea of a deep discussion is a debate about who’ll make the finals. I’ll admit that this is dramatically biased by being in country Australia where recreation is footy, the pub or talking about footy in the pub. There’s very little else to do in wagga, we don’t even have a bowling alley anymore and the ultimate tragedy is that it’s the dole office now! A source of fun has become a centre of obstructionist bureaucracy.
Nah no chance of me buying into that myth mate, I know I rock and I know that there’s nothing wrong with me, there’s only things wrong with the universe and the idiots within.
Hmm, maybe I should get back to that moonraker style plan to destroy the earth and save a select few to build a society founded on the principles of common sense, honesty and no DRM. Who wants to join me in a cool domed city on Mars?
oh my. There is a huge difference between antisocial and less socially agile (actually, is that even English? My English glitches once in a while). And with "people like us" I meant "me, you and everyone who thinks (s)he should be in the club too". And with social agility I meant the ability to manoevre in a social situation that the average person seems to find 'fun', while I loathe it because there's to many actors involved (i.e. bars, huge parties, etc.)
So
1. I wasn't generalizing
2. I didn't mean antisocial, I meant I certain ability to deal with specific social situations
This is not a counter-argument but an explanation. I could have worded things better back there, but I was in a hurry when I posted it. So there.
It doesn't really seem to be deserving a shiny new thread though =P
Post edited August 04, 2009 by LordCinnamon
PS/ this was the book i was skimming, i think:
http://www.amazon.com/Introvert-Advantage-Thrive-Extrovert-World/dp/0761123695
(no recommendation implied)
Good to see I'm not the only one.
I don't drink, smoke, go to parties and don't have that many friends yet I can hold a conversation just fine. The thing is most of the things I like are not exactly the same the majority like. Console gaming is far more spread out here than PC gaming and that can take a conversation only so far. In fact, I socialize better with family, people I've known for years, than with coworkers or friends I've met recently.
I do get the feeling of "not belonging" at times. Some groups of people are simply into things completely different from what I like or have a different vibe and I end up feeling like the odd wheel out.
Now, what I think is entirely my fault is the fact that I don't like to socialize too often. I'm all for socializing with people one day, but let's do it again.... in two weeks. I'm not the type who likes to hang around with the same people every day and every night. Give me my damn space!
I'm happy this way though. Can't say i feel miserable or depressed, since this is exactly how I like to be. Were I a different kind of person I'd just strive for something else instead.
I love the term less socially agile.
It's like saying floorprincess or sanitory manager when meaning someone who whipes the toilets clean. It just sounds better.
I brioke my thresholds when i was about 16-17.
I joined a youth movement because 3 friends from a lanparty where joining to.
To be honest : we came along , started chatting against eachother about the latest games and movies , while the rest of the so called normal , social people , where staring at the floor and the carpet as if it where hypnotizing.
Since then i realized that i do can interact and talk to other people. They felt good chatting even about the weather. Excuse me for then having superior feelings.
I'm sure aliasalpha can relate to this. I actually got instantly bored by saying : "nice weath...". I love to tell jokes to but i enjoy profound conversations about almost anything interesting : nature , machines , computers , relationships , games , esotheric stuff , ... .
But if a normal social persoon stares at the ceiling/carpet/floor/ugly painting/chips that they don't dare touching... then i'd rather be the socially less agile with pleasure
At lanparties in holland and belgium : we play games , chat , have a drink , smoke but all in a moderate way. I'd call that rather social right ;)
@LordCinammon
Yeah, I had another look at my post and saw that it kind of reads as a retort to what you said. It wasn't intended as that; your words just reminded me of a pet peeve.
And I definitely fit into your description of not finding the fun where others do, though in my continuingly arrogant way, I decide to phrase it slightly differently: I'm not afraid to dislike something. I know the cool thing is to "think positive" and "make the most of now" but I prefer "don't bullshit people by pretending to enjoy something you don't."
And I'm just going to go ahead and say that the reason for this pet peeve is that this whole thing was a large reason why I got dumped way back at the start of the year. Which is a long time I suppose, and I'm definitely over her, but since she's the only woman who's ever had the slightest bit of interest in me, the effects are still pretty cutting. A big part was that she couldn't get past the fact that parties were not my favourite thing ever.
"Why is this suddenly an issue? It's not like I kept it to myself, you knew way before we got together."
"I thought you were just shy, I thought you'd blossom."
"And suddenly like what I didn't?"
"I thought opening up would make you enjoy company more."
"It did."
"But you still don't like parties."
"Yes, but that's because I don't like parties."
We've remained friends, but I still don't think she realises just how affronted I was at that moment. I was hit with:
a) finding out that she didn't actually accept me for who I am at all
b) finding out that she saw my preference not as a choice but as a flaw that she'd hoped to correct
c) finding out that something I dislike was more important to her than I was
Of course, I could have told her any of these, but instead I went ahead and got sarcastic. Very mature, I am.
avatar
frostcircus: We've remained friends, but I still don't think she realises just how affronted I was at that moment. I was hit with:
a) finding out that she didn't actually accept me for who I am at all
b) finding out that she saw my preference not as a choice but as a flaw that she'd hoped to correct
c) finding out that something I dislike was more important to her than I was
Of course, I could have told her any of these, but instead I went ahead and got sarcastic. Very mature, I am.

I'd do exactly the same thing frostcircus. I to get rather sarcastic when hurt.
And i totally agree on the point not bullshitting people around pretending you are enjoying yourself.
Then you have to do it more and more hurting only 1 person in the end....yourself.
OFFTOPIC : great , i finally figured out the qoutes thingie. Always looking to far for the solution :s
Post edited August 04, 2009 by CyPhErIoN
avatar
CyPhErIoN: I'd do exactly the same thing frostcircus. I to get rather sarcastic when hurt.

I seem to also do it when talking about hurt! That last little sentence was total sarcasm, and no, it wasn't intentional.
Well technically it was irony, but shh.
avatar
frostcircus: OK, this ended up as a ridiculous hijack of Aliasalpha's thread, so I've decided not to inflict it on him and to instead give it its own topic. It's probably TL;DR (hard to tell in this tiny window), but maybe someone will read it and weigh in.

Interesting topic. As a foreword, I want to say this first: at the end of the day, you should define who you are. As humans, we are bound to be judged by others because of the communal society that we live in. And, I admit, I am guilty of letting myself be judged by others at times too. But, when that's all said and done, you should question this: why let yourself be judged? Why let others validate you? In other words, how do you define less socially agile? Do you think you are less socially agile just because people think you are? I personally couldn't care less. Just because I am tired and talk less, doesn't make me less socially capable when I am fully awake with huge doses of caffeine in my body.
Your way of thinking is healthy ie. "now take the rather arrogant stance that this is not because I'm somehow 'faulty,' but because most 'normal' people are lazy, weak and, frankly, boring". Simply put, just because you do not join the herd doesn't make you any less aware of your own abilities to communicate and interact with others. Too many people live with the 'herd' mentality, that it is unacceptable to think outside of the box. I call bullshit to that - you define your own life, you decide how you should live. I know some people think I'm less sociable because I don't go clubbing. Screw this, I think they are the social freaks for not wanting to go mountain climbing with me. Me, as an individual, their perception does not make.
I think if one is miserable, it's because of self-submission. Like euthanasia, though not as serious, you are who/how/what you want to be, provided of course you work within the limits governed by the laws of Science. Life may suck at several points, and although I haven't had the worst of them hit me simultaneously, I know people who've had very rough spots, and I really mean the worst case scenario type ie. it can't get any worse already. But, having spoken to them, we have agreed that we have to take matters into our own hands sometimes, and this is where it all comes down to perception - how you want to see the good things in life. I call bullshit to whoever tells me only losers take things by the day - my personal philosophy in life now is to occasional have a long term plan, but the ultimate way to live happily is to grab life by the balls and just look forward to the next day.
As Gandhi said before: "Live as if you were to die tomorrow." Live happily. Do what you want to do. The world may be depressing. People around you may be living in a facade - frankly I'm sure 80% of the people on my Facebook cannot be trusted as true buddies. But, and this is a huge but, don't let others define who you are. You define who you are. You are the only one who can make yourself feel good. Think about it - what if one day you were to achieve celebrity status somehow, and the whole world cheered for you, but the next day everyone boo'ed you over a scandal? External validation is only temporary, it cannot last. You are your own master.
I'm sorry if I have detracted too much from said topic, but I hope it is still relevant.
Post edited August 04, 2009 by lowyhong
avatar
frostcircus: We've remained friends, but I still don't think she realises just how affronted I was at that moment. I was hit with:
a) finding out that she didn't actually accept me for who I am at all
b) finding out that she saw my preference not as a choice but as a flaw that she'd hoped to correct
c) finding out that something I dislike was more important to her than I was

Whaaat? A girl trying to change you for something she likes more? You don't say!
Really, some girls are like that. They think they can change the bits they don't like and keep the ones they do. In the end, they don't realize they're dating an actor instead of a person. And if you change TOO MUCH, you're no longer the person they fell in love with.
I was up front with who is now my wife, from the very get go. I told her, on the very first date I didn't like "mind games". No "guess what I really want" or "guess what I'm angry about"... Just freaking tell me!
I'm pretty much a wysiwyg kinda fellow.
"you define your own life, you decide how you should live" is probably the best piece of advice I've ever seen and one I've been trying to live by since I realised I was getting depressed by the opinions of idiots who lacked the cerebral capacity to comprehend this very sentence.
My major advantage is that I have one truly exceptional friend who serves as a source of constant inspiration. She's had the shittiest life of anyone I know (and I can tell you now I am a magnet for people with deeply fucked up lives, its quite uncanny), she was sexually abused as a child, kicked out of home and spent years being physically abused by nuns in a catholic orphanage, ran off and lived on the streets where she sometimes had to make a living as a prostitute, she contracted an incurable and gradually fatal autoimmune diesease where she's basically becoming allergic to her own body and a one time boyfriend broke up with her by trying to murder her by hitting her in the head. With a HAMMER
She's a pretty happy person all told with well brought up kids, frankly I'm astonished and inspired every time I talk to her. If I had to choose my all time hero, it'd be a fight between her and Optimus Prime
Post edited August 04, 2009 by Aliasalpha
avatar
frostcircus: We've remained friends, but I still don't think she realises just how affronted I was at that moment. I was hit with:
a) finding out that she didn't actually accept me for who I am at all
b) finding out that she saw my preference not as a choice but as a flaw that she'd hoped to correct
c) finding out that something I dislike was more important to her than I was
Of course, I could have told her any of these, but instead I went ahead and got sarcastic. Very mature, I am.

Girls like boys who are more playful. It adds a sense of mystery, a la Bond. I guess the party bit was where she thought she could find the more playful side of you. I don't know you well enough though, so there's probably more than what I can deduce from your situation.
avatar
Aliasalpha: My major advantage is that I have one truly exceptional friend who serves as a source of constant inspiration. She's had the shittiest life of anyone I know (and I can tell you now I am a magnet for people with deeply fucked up lives, its quite uncanny), she was sexually abused as a child, kicked out of home and spent years being physically abused by nuns in a catholic orphanage, ran off and lived on the streets where she sometimes had to make a living as a prostitute, she contracted an incurable and gradually fatal autoimmune diesease where she's basically becoming allergic to her own body and a one time boyfriend broke up with her by trying to murder her by hitting her in the head. With a HAMMER
She's a pretty happy person all told with well brought up kids, frankly I'm astonished and inspired every time I talk to her. If I had to choose my all time hero, it'd be a fight between her and Optimus Prime

She deserves to have a house filled with kudos. These people are amazing, and their will to live is so powerful, they should be looked upon whenever life has lost all its meaning.
I think the strongest reason to live is simply...the reason to live. No matter how bad life is, it's still life. A rose is still a rose no matter how many thorns it has. I may be wrong, but I think people like your friend live on such a reason. These are people worth looking up to.
Post edited August 04, 2009 by lowyhong
I'd consider myself quite a social person, I get along with people easily.
However, I have a similar issue to our friends from Norway, and that is most social events tend to centre around alcohol.
I've had my time as a big drinker in university, and I had a great time. But I'm older now, and my life isn't defined by how much I can drink.
I have a handful of good friends who I trust and can be myself around, and I'm happy with that. I spend a moderate amount of time alone (I live alone) and enjoy the peace and solitude. I feel a bit of an outsider for that, but it doesn't bother me much. I do feel like I'm sociable for the benefit of other people, rather than for myself (I help organise and run social events at work for example...).
I often wonder if there would be a job I could get which would involve less contact with the general population. I'm kinda hoping we get moved onto shift work so I can do night shifts or something. It would suit me better I think.
I do find I need time to myself, with my own thoughts. The comment about overthinking is probably true, but I wouldn't give up that. I enjoy paying attention to whats happening in the world, and in my life. The world needs people like us who pay attention to the details, and hopefully think of solutions!
avatar
Andy_Panthro: I often wonder if there would be a job I could get which would involve less contact with the general population. I'm kinda hoping we get moved onto shift work so I can do night shifts or something. It would suit me better I think.

Thats the exact reason that being knocked back for... no not knocked back, ignored for that laptop deployment job was so devastating to my confidence. It was 3 years of working basically alone deploying disc images and arranging transport & logistics for a massed deployment of student laptops. It was perfect for the money (plenty enough for me), the location (2 blocks away) and the fact I'd be mostly working solo. Not only did I not get the job, the way I found out that I missed it was someone at my job hunting agency saying "Oh my sister went for an interview for that job last week". Not even the simple courtesy of saying "Sorry you missed out, good luck next time". Hell I'd have been happy with "Nope, we don't want you, get stuffed". Reckon this was one of those dodgy nepotism jobs, I'd lay odds that if I was to find out who got it and compare their surname to the list of people making the decisions, there'd be a match
Hmm, Is it just my imagination or am I turning this thread into a general bitch session? Heh maybe in order to prevent a threadjacking I should start a "general bitch session" or "vent your spleen" thread where people can just scream at the universe in general to get it off their chest.