Posted April 09, 2012
I don't need anyone here telling me, this has been discussed all over the internet, but this coming from me who is new to the series and just bought all 3 games so I'm starting the franchise from beginning to end. Now I'm aware of the whole ending fiasco, but to your suprise I'm not on the side saying, "THE ENDING WAS A PIECE OF SHIT,F#CK YOU BIOWARE" because I read what the ending is and I realized that imo the reason gamers think the ending was bad is because Shepard does not survive in any of the endings, he could either die a hero's death or "Shepard was evil he deserved to die" death, but ( I have not played 3 yet, but my brother has been playing it so much he told me) do gamers realize there is an ending where Shepard does live, and no it's not the "alleged" upcoming dlc, it's already there. My brother said that in order to get the "Perfect" ending you have to get enough "war assets" to complete your military fleet against the reapers then maximize it's effectiveness. Doing this in the single player takes longer and harder, but doing it in the multiplayer will be faster. So far my brother has not reached it yet and I'm just starting the series from the first one.
I am certein you guys already know about getting the perfect ending from the war assets system, but given how the fans raged against Bioware demaneding them to give a "better" ending dlc to me fans overlooked that the ending they wanted was already there.
(I am new to the series so I am open to corrections)
I am certein you guys already know about getting the perfect ending from the war assets system, but given how the fans raged against Bioware demaneding them to give a "better" ending dlc to me fans overlooked that the ending they wanted was already there.
(I am new to the series so I am open to corrections)
Post edited April 09, 2012 by Elmofongo