My personal thoughts on the time line and distance-

6:55- Water is out (water was out for one hour)
8:55- Workers complete project to restore water- Workers go on break (25 to 30 min break)

Distance- 7 miles away/ About 20 minutes away following speed limits

9:08- Alarm sounds at bank and assuming the guard was right there and not from a far away location a fight started right there and then

9:16- Washer is turned on

9:20/9:25- Workers notice a man dragging a body, detain man and call police
9:31- Police arrive- Suspect detained
9:41- Washing machine timer goes off- Washing cycle is 25 minutes- Suspect is in custody

Edit- Lets see the evidence from the field!
Edit Edit- It was a water problem not power, will rearrange this.

There was a water problem, not a power outage.

I'm pretty sure theres something we could scooped up from the Evidence from the Car

Robbery, money, blood, fingerprints, torn cloth to match with the one in the laundry?

You're the one who protests the most and claims that it'll be too complicated, and here you are, making an entire timeline.
Pretty sure there's some wise old saying about this, but darned if I know what it is.

Technically it doesn't say "evidence from the car in the robbery" it just says "the car." Could be the defendant's car.

Or alternatively it could be car-related evidence from the robbery scene - tire marks, etc.

Before I decide on its value, it would just be nice to confirm, and a little bit of clarity on where the car turned up, if it did, might be helpful.

Well, well, well. Guess after loosing his wife, the poor guy felt kinda lonely and wanted to have a bit of "human contact", but was to broke to pay for a hoe...

Jokes aside, sounds rather weird dragging a corpse through the woods, during the night, why not rather than just call the police and leave the clean-up to them.

I'll go ahead and be vote for Evidence from the Car , as this seems one of those that are more likely to give additional infos on the 2nd accomplice, and whether or not the defendant may be said person.

Actually wondering where the car has been found, as this wasn't mentioned (unless this is also supposed to be included in above evidence)

Prosecution Exhibit C, Autopsy Report on the other hand seems rather redundant so far, as we already know the guy got shot by the guard.

Sidenote: Minor mistake / gripe, 8:55 means it's in the moring, so I assume based on the "full moon" part, you meant 20:55 (adapt other dates accordingly). It's rather easy to confuse European time and US Time when not used too, happens all the time to me with AM and PM.

Sidenote 2: Not in for a prize either.


Edit: Agree with bler144, it would be good if it was specified... I actually assumed it was implied that the car was the one from the getaway.

There was only one car mentioned in the introduction, and I think that The Puzzlemaster won't stoop so low as to try and confuse us like that. RIGHT PUZZLEMASTER?

I'd 2nd this. Puzzlemaster please clear things up a bit before we all strip naked and do the hula dance.

I do assume you're right, but assumptions in a puzzle can be dangerous. Might as well try to confirm/disprove them.

Read my timeline- a crime was comitted at 9ish pm and the workers saw the dude dragging the other dude in a full moon.

*innocent whistling*
Well, you see, it's th-
...on second thought, I'm kinda curious to see what this would look like. With a decent-quality video camera, it would make good blackmail material.
.....it also really makes me wonder why this is the first thing that comes to your mind when getting frustrated.
..........
Do you need a therapist, man? Have you considered my previous suggestion of visiting your local church every once in a while? I really think you sho-
OK, OK, PUT YOUR CLOTHES BACK ON, I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING!
It's a car that was found parked by the field.
No, I'm not telling you whose it is or what it's doing there. If you want info, vote on it.

Not cool, and to think I defended you. :P
(also not how it would go on a trial)

Okay, my mistake... like I said, have some problems with the way time / the clock works in the US...

I limit everybody to only one piece of evidence per court day, make them vote on what they can see, ban poo flinging, encourage a potato to strip naked and dance the hula, and he complains about how unrealistic this is compared to an actual trial. Good Lord.

Well, to be frank, this should be about the information gathered FROM the evidence, not trying to guess where the evidence COMES from. But hey, it's your game, I'll play along.