It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Milo's article on prominent SJW being pedo and still being supported despite proof : http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/09/11/leading-gamergate-critic-sarah-nyberg-claimed-to-be-a-pedophile-apologised-for-white-nationalism/
TB on Anita : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EfqcX4iHCo&feature=youtu.be&t=2h19m32s

Keep in mind SJWs also defended Ian Miles Cheong even after he was proven to have said antisemitic stuff and gave more than journalists-sticking-out-for-each-other defense to Tariq Moosa after his necrophilia and incest articles.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Am I the only one who is mildly fine with paraphilias. I mean, I hate child moesters, but if you are attracted to minors there are alternatives like lolicon and that stuff. Also, necrophilia is gross and all, but nobody realy gets hurt. Not that I want them to be legal or mainstream, not even accepted, and what these people is wrong, and also doublethink. But I think focusing on paraphilias is kind of an ad hominem unless they actually do something harmful, as in Nyberg's case.
IMO its more about hypocrisy because aGG always accuses GG of sheltering pedos because GG has threads on 8chan which just happens to be used by pedos. Same with Tariq's work. They can't handle a bikini and still shelter people who argue for people who are more perverted. The pervs will roll like they roll and I'd not rather look into what they're doing as long as they aren't harming anyone and staying away from normal people. But it takes a special snowflake level of self realization to have liquidated morals on such controversial topics and change them around just to promote one sick cancerous ideology and still ''condemn'' the acts a few seconds later.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Am I the only one who is mildly fine with paraphilias. I mean, I hate child moesters, but if you are attracted to minors there are alternatives like lolicon and that stuff. Also, necrophilia is gross and all, but nobody realy gets hurt. Not that I want them to be legal or mainstream, not even accepted, and what these people is wrong, and also doublethink. But I think focusing on paraphilias is kind of an ad hominem unless they actually do something harmful, as in Nyberg's case.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: IMO its more about hypocrisy because aGG always accuses GG of sheltering pedos because GG has threads on 8chan which just happens to be used by pedos. Same with Tariq's work. They can't handle a bikini and still shelter people who argue for people who are more perverted. The pervs will roll like they roll and I'd not rather look into what they're doing as long as they aren't harming anyone and staying away from normal people. But it takes a special snowflake level of self realization to have liquidated morals on such controversial topics and change them around just to promote one sick cancerous ideology and still ''condemn'' the acts a few seconds later.
Well, I think we have already stablished that aGG, and SJWs in general are an Orwellian nightmare made real. They are full of doublethink and newspeak. Supporting icompatible views and making up new words. And of course, anything thay do is only right when they do it. They are an exaple of how corrupt can turn anyone into a monster no matter the level that person has.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Milo's article on prominent SJW being pedo and still being supported despite proof : http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/09/11/leading-gamergate-critic-sarah-nyberg-claimed-to-be-a-pedophile-apologised-for-white-nationalism/
TB on Anita : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EfqcX4iHCo&feature=youtu.be&t=2h19m32s

Keep in mind SJWs also defended Ian Miles Cheong even after he was proven to have said antisemitic stuff and gave more than journalists-sticking-out-for-each-other defense to Tariq Moosa after his necrophilia and incest articles.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Am I the only one who is mildly fine with paraphilias. I mean, I hate child moesters, but if you are attracted to minors there are alternatives like lolicon and that stuff. Also, necrophilia is gross and all, but nobody realy gets hurt. Not that I want them to be legal or mainstream, not even accepted, and what these people is wrong, and also doublethink. But I think focusing on paraphilias is kind of an ad hominem unless they actually do something harmful, as in Nyberg's case.
TBH, I"m not really sure why necrophillia is illegal or any number of other things that people can do to corpses. With the exception of hygiene issues like ensuring that they're properly buried, most of it is religious or cultural.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Am I the only one who is mildly fine with paraphilias. I mean, I hate child moesters, but if you are attracted to minors there are alternatives like lolicon and that stuff. Also, necrophilia is gross and all, but nobody realy gets hurt. Not that I want them to be legal or mainstream, not even accepted, and what these people is wrong, and also doublethink. But I think focusing on paraphilias is kind of an ad hominem unless they actually do something harmful, as in Nyberg's case.
avatar
hedwards: TBH, I"m not really sure why necrophillia is illegal or any number of other things that people can do to corpses. With the exception of hygiene issues like ensuring that they're properly buried, most of it is religious or cultural.
Respect for the dead human being who once inhabited their body, respect for their relatives and those who loved and cared about them - that's just for starters, I could go on. I could say its "sick" and "disgusting" beyond belief, but I wouldn't want to be judgmental or practice any sort of differentiation between what's right or wrong now, that might offend or upset some of these sick criminal f*cks - oops there I go being judgmental again, even discriminating :-o - between one thing and another. Don't you know there's no difference between anything, everything's the same, a giraffe is the same as a lobster! Pedophilia, necrophilia, zoophilia its all good ... stop discriminating ... stop judging!
Post edited September 13, 2015 by noncompliantgame
avatar
hedwards: TBH, I"m not really sure why necrophillia is illegal or any number of other things that people can do to corpses. With the exception of hygiene issues like ensuring that they're properly buried, most of it is religious or cultural.
avatar
noncompliantgame: Respect for the dead human being who once inhabited their body, respect for their relatives and those who loved and cared about them - that's just for starters, I could go on. I could say its "sick" and "disgusting" beyond belief, but I wouldn't want to be judgmental or practice any sort of differentiation between what's right or wrong now, that might offend or upset some of these sick criminal f*cks - oops there I go being judgmental again, even discriminating :-o - between one thing and another. Don't you know there's no difference between anything, everything's the same, a giraffe is the same as a lobster! Pedophilia, necrophilia, zoophilia its all good ... stop discriminating ... stop judging!
Zoophilia and pedophilia shouldn't really be in the same category there.

A body is a body, there is no person in there and there are a rather bizarre range of customs that are considered to be "respectful" to the body. Ultimately, a body is just a body, there's nobody in there and no particular reason why it should be treated in a way other than as parts to be reused.
The shitstain doxing troll that doxed the SPJAirplay panelists and did harm to aGG as well has been arrested by the FBI. currently Ghazi and the yellow media is painting him as a GG supporter even though he used accounts from both sides to troll the other. A KiA digger looked into it and found more than 10+ accounts being used to troll both sides : https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3knzsx/drama_regarding_joshua_goldberg/
Basically a third party troll is being represented as a GG supporter because it suits the narrative.

As the the necro thing; bodies cannot consent but if a person can decide what happens to his / her body after their death as in cases of donation to medical research or organ donation, most people would choose not to have their body desecrated so most of it is illegal anyhow since I doubt the sick people into this ever care to ask the person who died on how they want for their remains to be treated. And attachment to a person does not go after their death and their friends and family being the priority; IMO the principle that a dead body has no more significance than an object is unreasonable to their loved ones in terms of respect for their feelings; especially considering they're the friends and family who would have high attachment to them.
Read these :
1.http://www.doesnotplaywellwithothers.com/comic/pwc-0239
2.http://www.doesnotplaywellwithothers.com/comic/pwc-0240
I loled silently.
Equality
On the topic of necrophilia. There is a group or Kali worshipers in India who eat corpses and feces, and they have sex with corpses, all for the sake of reaching ilumination by facing impurity. It is a cultural thing.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: On the topic of necrophilia. There is a group or Kali worshipers in India who eat corpses and feces, and they have sex with corpses, all for the sake of reaching ilumination by facing impurity. It is a cultural thing.
Yes there are. I don't know if they do necrophilia but they do eat corpses and all other manner of vile shit (literally). They exist on the fringes of mainstream saddhuhood (saddhu = ascetic). They also conduct animal sacrifices. Fortunately they exist only in a few areas; like one or two, one of which is unfortunately Varanasi which has many important temples and is a very active pilgrim center. They believe that going to the edge of unholiness will bring them to holiness. Most of them are probably crazy as well.
Post edited September 14, 2015 by Shadowstalker16
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Not as equal as father of the year : https://archive.is/NPmWx
Holy shit.
It took me a while to understand the outrage but then I checked the account he has sent the pic to...
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Not as equal as father of the year : https://archive.is/NPmWx
avatar
Klumpen0815: Holy shit.
It took me a while to understand the outrage but then I checked the account he has sent the pic to...
Yup, there is a difference between acknowledging someone has pedo-disorder but sending them a picture of your kid is a messed up thing for a father to do.
avatar
Klumpen0815: Holy shit.
It took me a while to understand the outrage but then I checked the account he has sent the pic to...
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Yup, there is a difference between acknowledging someone has pedo-disorder but sending them a picture of your kid is a messed up thing for a father to do.
And we're not even talking about hebephilia which is mostly meant when people talk about it but actual pedophilia with pre-teens and Nyberg is even proud of it and advertised sex with pre-teens in the internet. Sending someone like this such a picture is truly messed up and blows my mind out of orbit.
The father is either extremely ignorant or a pedo too. :/
Post edited September 14, 2015 by Klumpen0815
avatar
Klumpen0815: Equality
We need to brace our minds when facing pictures.
To further the point of this one, I'd like to add that trying to imagine the same scenario(s) with not-model-looking people can bring someone to learn a lot on his perception of society.
avatar
Klumpen0815: Equality
avatar
Potzato: We need to brace our minds when facing pictures.
To further the point of this one, I'd like to add that trying to imagine the same scenario(s) with not-model-looking people can bring someone to learn a lot on his perception of society.
I wouldn't call those people model looking seeing they don't seem to be too weak to stand up but anyhoo;
Yes. It is a window into the norms of human society. It also reflects irl treatment of people by other people. Really interesting what a picture can do really.