It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
It's like the captain of the Titanic claiming there's no icebergs.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/06/wikipedia-founder-backs-sites-systems-after-extortion-scam
low rated
avatar
Elmofongo: I apoligize for linking this but:

http://kotaku.com/why-quiet-wears-that-skimpy-outfit-in-metal-gear-solid-1729329735

Amusing how Kotaku talks about Quite from MGS5 as if she was the only "sexualized" female of the whole series, completely forgetting the likes Sniper Wolf, EVA, and the B&B unit from MGS4.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: YOU FORGOT SNAKE'S BODYSUIT FROM MGS4.
Other than that; they are judgmental and hypocritical. No one complained about ''Hot Ryu'' but instead the female game journos made up gymnastic exercises to justify their horniness. Either way they are people who hold the belief that gender defines ''minorities'' more than anything else. In essence; they're saying women need female characters to play as because they believe women's self identity is influenced by her gender and nothing else. They fail to have any regard as to whether individual experiences or anything else defines it and hence dismisses women's experiences, personality, views and everything in general and reduces them to the level of gender different and nothing else.

Same with this case. They dismiss everything else about quiet and focus only on her being female and her being dressed that way. This will offer neither constructive criticism nor any advice on how women are portrayed in games (which isn't their or anyone's fucking business because freedom of expression means you can create a game with bimbo if you want to and not have these ''liberals'' who act more like conservatives question its right to exist ; and rightly so).
Don't forget....Raiden:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe2ZW4boNqE
avatar
Elmofongo: I apoligize for linking this but:

http://kotaku.com/why-quiet-wears-that-skimpy-outfit-in-metal-gear-solid-1729329735

Amusing how Kotaku talks about Quite from MGS5 as if she was the only "sexualized" female of the whole series, completely forgetting the likes Sniper Wolf, EVA, and the B&B unit from MGS4.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: YOU FORGOT SNAKE'S BODYSUIT FROM MGS4.
Other than that; they are judgmental and hypocritical. No one complained about ''Hot Ryu'' but instead the female game journos made up gymnastic exercises to justify their horniness. Either way they are people who hold the belief that gender defines ''minorities'' more than anything else. In essence; they're saying women need female characters to play as because they believe women's self identity is influenced by her gender and nothing else. They fail to have any regard as to whether individual experiences or anything else defines it and hence dismisses women's experiences, personality, views and everything in general and reduces them to the level of gender different and nothing else.

Same with this case. They dismiss everything else about quiet and focus only on her being female and her being dressed that way. This will offer neither constructive criticism nor any advice on how women are portrayed in games (which isn't their or anyone's fucking business because freedom of expression means you can create a game with bimbo if you want to and not have these ''liberals'' who act more like conservatives question its right to exist ; and rightly so).
I recommend you to do some research about how Puritans, mostly in NA, embraced original feminism and of course, twisted it, it explains many things.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/10195151/Why-has-feminism-become-obsessed-with-censoring-the-enemy.html

https://www.lagrange.edu/resources/pdf/citations/2011/10_Hall_History.pdf

Modern feminists.
Dedicating to causes outside of themselves, living lives committed to the Word
of God, anticipating a judgment before a holy God and desiring a glorious
eternity, Puritan men and women encouraged womanhood according to the
standards of Scripture. They upheld equality of the sexes in marriage and
society, valuing covenant love and submission as essential for obedience,
enjoyment and order. Puritans held a high view of women and respected
women’s character and abilities, though influences of a misogynic worldview
would take time to overcome. Historians need to understand the Puritan
woman according to her own desires and worldview, not their own; then and
only then will America understand Puritan womanhood and its importance.


Some people don´t even realize with who are sleeping in the same bed, I talking metaphorically of course, about that "liberals" that are joining forces with some of the most retograd and superstitious groups of people...
Post edited September 09, 2015 by YaTEdiGo
avatar
YaTEdiGo: I recommend you to do some research about how Puritans, mostly in NA, embraced original feminism and of course, twisted it, it explains many things.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/10195151/Why-has-feminism-become-obsessed-with-censoring-the-enemy.html

https://www.lagrange.edu/resources/pdf/citations/2011/10_Hall_History.pdf

Modern feminists.
Dedicating to causes outside of themselves, living lives committed to the Word
of God, anticipating a judgment before a holy God and desiring a glorious
eternity, Puritan men and women encouraged womanhood according to the
standards of Scripture. They upheld equality of the sexes in marriage and
society, valuing covenant love and submission as essential for obedience,
enjoyment and order. Puritans held a high view of women and respected
women’s character and abilities, though influences of a misogynic worldview
would take time to overcome. Historians need to understand the Puritan
woman according to her own desires and worldview, not their own; then and
only then will America understand Puritan womanhood and its importance.


Some people don´t even realize with who are sleeping in the same bed, I talking metaphorically of course, about that "liberals" that are joining forces with some of the most retograd and superstitious groups of people...
Yup, when the world media is controlled by people who believe in any means to an end; the common people will doubtlessly suffer. Don't forget them demanding western centrist and western sensitive feminism makes it a worse experience for people playing who don't live in countries with such cripplingly high levels of outrage culture infestation.

Liberals= live however you want and let live
SJW=live by the stagnant standards we set for you that we know are progressive and no one else outside should exist
Post edited September 10, 2015 by Shadowstalker16
avatar
Spectre: It's like the captain of the Titanic claiming there's no icebergs.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/06/wikipedia-founder-backs-sites-systems-after-extortion-scam
Lol, he looks a bit stressed there!
avatar
Shadowstalker16: 8<~~~~~~~

AKA; libertarian left vs authoritarian left
FYI, libertarians tend to be right across the left-right political paradigm, as are those with an authoritarian tendency (altho they are more often considered to be at the extreme ends of this paradigm), however authoritarian is more a general term, an adjective, rather than a political phenomenon, where as libertarianism in its many and varied forms tends to be social and political, both as a movement and phenomena. Hope that helps. ;-)
Post edited September 10, 2015 by noncompliantgame
avatar
Spectre: It's like the captain of the Titanic claiming there's no icebergs.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/06/wikipedia-founder-backs-sites-systems-after-extortion-scam
avatar
noncompliantgame: Lol, he looks a bit stressed there!
avatar
Shadowstalker16: 8<~~~~~~~

AKA; libertarian left vs authoritarian left
avatar
noncompliantgame: FYI, libertarians tend to be right across the left-right political paradigm, as are those with an authoritarian tendency (altho they are more often considered to be at the extreme ends of this paradigm), however authoritarian is more a general term, an adjective, rather than a political phenomenon, where as libertarianism in its many and varied forms tends to be social and political, both as a movement and phenomena. Hope that helps. ;-)
Yeah; I messed up the terms kinda.
avatar
dragonbeast: look at latest stories, its there

archive in case of whatever
https://archive.is/mWFi6
avatar
arrjayjee: Thanks. The article is pretty scathing and yet terribly neutral. Which is what pisses people off more than anything. Everybody hates moderates.
In the same spirit gamergate.me did a game journos are dead thing a time ago...

https://gamergate.me/2015/01/game-journalists-are-dead/
avatar
arrjayjee: Thanks. The article is pretty scathing and yet terribly neutral. Which is what pisses people off more than anything. Everybody hates moderates.
avatar
Bunglatron: In the same spirit gamergate.me did a game journos are dead thing a time ago...

https://gamergate.me/2015/01/game-journalists-are-dead/
Doesn't seem like in the same spirit. Journos did it out of hatred for their audience and trying to cover up their own ethical violations and this one just points out the many ways traditional games media is becoming less influential and less worthy of that influence.
https://twitter.com/ChihiroDev

So do you think she'll deliver on the truthbombs?
avatar
WBGhiro: https://twitter.com/ChihiroDev

So do you think she'll deliver on the truthbombs?
currently many in gg are still skeptical because we have no confirmation of truth.

(but hopeful)
avatar
Bunglatron: In the same spirit gamergate.me did a game journos are dead thing a time ago...

https://gamergate.me/2015/01/game-journalists-are-dead/
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Doesn't seem like in the same spirit. Journos did it out of hatred for their audience and trying to cover up their own ethical violations and this one just points out the many ways traditional games media is becoming less influential and less worthy of that influence.
I don't get what you mean. Both those articles are the same theme of "game journalism is dead" so they are in the same "spirit" - is what I'm saying. I guess the devils in the details.
avatar
dragonbeast: look at latest stories, its there

archive in case of whatever
https://archive.is/mWFi6
avatar
arrjayjee: Thanks. The article is pretty scathing and yet terribly neutral. Which is what pisses people off more than anything. Everybody hates moderates.
FWIW, I thought this was a great article. But I'll remain a healthy skeptic in regards to their developer claims.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Doesn't seem like in the same spirit. Journos did it out of hatred for their audience and trying to cover up their own ethical violations and this one just points out the many ways traditional games media is becoming less influential and less worthy of that influence.
avatar
Bunglatron: I don't get what you mean. Both those articles are the same theme of "game journalism is dead" so they are in the same "spirit" - is what I'm saying. I guess the devils in the details.
Only if 'game journalism is dead' actually translates to shitty self-important game blogs and websites going away. I'm all for that. If they're going to claim Armageddon, then let the fire and brimstone rain down. Otherwise, the ass whoopings will continue until morale improves.
Milo's article on prominent SJW being pedo and still being supported despite proof : http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/09/11/leading-gamergate-critic-sarah-nyberg-claimed-to-be-a-pedophile-apologised-for-white-nationalism/
TB on Anita : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EfqcX4iHCo&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;t=2h19m32s

Keep in mind SJWs also defended Ian Miles Cheong even after he was proven to have said antisemitic stuff and gave more than journalists-sticking-out-for-each-other defense to Tariq Moosa after his necrophilia and incest articles.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Milo's article on prominent SJW being pedo and still being supported despite proof : http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/09/11/leading-gamergate-critic-sarah-nyberg-claimed-to-be-a-pedophile-apologised-for-white-nationalism/
TB on Anita : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EfqcX4iHCo&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;t=2h19m32s

Keep in mind SJWs also defended Ian Miles Cheong even after he was proven to have said antisemitic stuff and gave more than journalists-sticking-out-for-each-other defense to Tariq Moosa after his necrophilia and incest articles.
Am I the only one who is mildly fine with paraphilias. I mean, I hate child moesters, but if you are attracted to minors there are alternatives like lolicon and that stuff. Also, necrophilia is gross and all, but nobody realy gets hurt. Not that I want them to be legal or mainstream, not even accepted, and what these people is wrong, and also doublethink. But I think focusing on paraphilias is kind of an ad hominem unless they actually do something harmful, as in Nyberg's case.