It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
only gamergate harasses, SJW are all nice people

this kind of stuff actually makes me afraid

but only gamergate is scaring people right? only gg is being bad? sht i'm slowly getting frightened about being pro-gg. Funny how antis would have long before called it terrorism.
Post edited May 09, 2015 by dragonbeast
low rated
avatar
Fever_Discordia: Just look on Steam and see if it says Positive, Mixed or Negative - those things are usually pretty accurate :P
(unlike GOG reviews, actually, that usually turn the rose tinting up to 11, it has to be said!)
This.. is literally exactly what I do when I spot a game I might like.
I search for it on Steam, & then I check the percentages for positive/negative, maybe read a few of the top reviews, & check the Discussion Forums.
It's generally a really good simple way to verify: quality, community, & developer behaviour.
(ie: Does it work & is it fun? Is the community good or awful? Are the devs shitheads or nice people?)

Ethics in Steam journalism!
avatar
Shadowstalker16: AAA devs do BS, they get backlash
Indie devs do BS, they get backlash

Now that is some top rate equality if ya ask me!

In other news, Leigh Alexander oppressed by a pack of cards : http://www.reaxxion.com/8564/sjws-turn-their-guns-on-cards-against-humanity
Is that really news?
I mean, I think I recall the odd card or something that was genuinely a bit "ehhh", but considering Cards Against Humanity is great fun and can be fucking hilarious.. (and that I've played almost exclusively with 'feminist SJWs' ), I'm not sure one person being an arse is terribly representative of anything to do with Gamergate.

Is it?
I thought this was a 'Gamergate news' thread?
Or is it relevant because of the identity of that person?
*shrugs*
Who gives a shit?

Maybe we should all play CAH together online.
avatar
dragonbeast: only gamergate harasses, SJW are all nice people

this kind of stuff actually makes me afraid

but only gamergate is scaring people right? only gg is being bad? sht i'm slowly getting frightened about being pro-gg. Funny how antis would have long before called it terrorism.
... so one person that was doing stupid vicious shit a decade ago (before any of this fuckery started) is somehow conclusive proof that SJWs are "terrorists" ?
I mean, c'mon. At least pick someone that does NOT have a history of such (criminal? surely cyberstalking like that should be criminal) behaviour.

(Related:
... can everyone agree here that radfems are generally assholes?
Although I'm not sure everyone will, since TERFs exist and agree with some specific individuals in this thread that think they oppose radfems.
But yeah, TERFs & SWERFs = Shitheads. True story.)

... and upon reading through more of that thread, I am again sorely disappointed.
I mean, c'mon. You link to an example of a radfem arse, and then the side you ostensibly support is using some pretty shitty language & engaging in some pretty shitty behaviours themselves.
I thought Gamergate wasn't about that stuff?
Post edited May 10, 2015 by SusurrusParadox
avatar
dragonbeast: only gamergate harasses, SJW are all nice people

this kind of stuff actually makes me afraid

but only gamergate is scaring people right? only gg is being bad? sht i'm slowly getting frightened about being pro-gg. Funny how antis would have long before called it terrorism.
Too late, at its beginning GG had been compared to ISIS and the poor oppressed feministfrequency have basically won the non-gaming public media battle already, the only thing that is going to cure that cancer is having mature discussions about the real issues and let the SWJs crap all they want like the conservative spewed inanities about violence years ago until research and time proved they where just a bunch of retards looking for audience/votes and attention, the same cycle is going to repeat itself unfortunately.
avatar
dragonbeast: only gamergate harasses, SJW are all nice people

this kind of stuff actually makes me afraid

but only gamergate is scaring people right? only gg is being bad? sht i'm slowly getting frightened about being pro-gg. Funny how antis would have long before called it terrorism.
avatar
Narakir: Too late, at its beginning GG had been compared to ISIS and the poor oppressed feministfrequency have basically won the non-gaming public media battle already, the only thing that is going to cure that cancer is having mature discussions about the real issues and let the SWJs crap all they want like the conservative spewed inanities about violence years ago until research and time proved they where just a bunch of retards looking for audience/votes and attention, the same cycle is going to repeat itself unfortunately.
The irony being that ISIS associates itself with anti-gg yet gamergate is compared to ISIS.
low rated
avatar
Narakir: Too late, at its beginning GG had been compared to ISIS and the poor oppressed feministfrequency have basically won the non-gaming public media battle already, the only thing that is going to cure that cancer is having mature discussions about the real issues and let the SWJs crap all they want like the conservative spewed inanities about violence years ago until research and time proved they where just a bunch of retards looking for audience/votes and attention, the same cycle is going to repeat itself unfortunately.
avatar
tremere110: The irony being that ISIS associates itself with anti-gg yet gamergate is compared to ISIS.
Interesting, you've a source ?
avatar
Narakir: Interesting, you've a source ?
I believe they're referring to this: link (it's at the very bottom)

Seem to remember that being an accident arising from antis renting out bots to prop up their #stopgamergate2014 hashtag.
Leigh Alexander and that tabletop game website (it not only her;read the linked article next time) being offended at satire is proof that SJWs are what we think they are. Moral police out to stop anything that offends them and people who are indoctrinated into the groupthink enough to shamelessly insult and criticize proof based studies and methods.
low rated
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Leigh Alexander and that tabletop game website (it not only her;read the linked article next time) being offended at satire is proof that SJWs are what we think they are. Moral police out to stop anything that offends them and people who are indoctrinated into the groupthink enough to shamelessly insult and criticize proof based studies and methods.
But dude, it was a review, if a reviewer genuinely and sincerely finds a comedy product to be unfunny and offensive their review should reflect that - it's kind of their job!

There was no talk of trying to stop anything!
low rated

Often, many of these combinations aren’t very good. They aren’t very good whether you find their subjects funny or not, offensive or not. They aren’t very good because they’re sometimes nonsensical or just weird. They aren’t very good because, in an attempt to be as shocking, controversial and offensive as possible, the designers have forgotten to… make things work. There’s very little creativity in combining cards into a joke, because the work and the structuring is done for you. It’s almost like copying someone else’s homework. There’s no life in there.
agreeing with a bad review of the game mechanics of a very popular game
=
being part of a communist conspiracy for which a Final Solution has to be found


Yes, absolutely, you can tell which way the wind is blowing.
Post edited May 10, 2015 by Vainamoinen
avatar
Vainamoinen: agreeing with a bad review of the game mechanics of a very popular game
=
being part of a communist conspiracy for which a Final Solution has to be found

Yes, absolutely, you can tell which way the wind is blowing.
if you think that is what they are saying, you are severely delusional

also funny how you are the one shoehorning communism and politics into this all the time, and then claim we shove politics into it.

and that final solution part? for real man?
if you see it like that, get laser eye surgery because you must be seeing distorted

There is no left vs right here, if anything its authoritarian vs libertarian
Post edited May 10, 2015 by dragonbeast
low rated
avatar
Vainamoinen: agreeing with a bad review of the game mechanics of a very popular game
=
being part of a communist conspiracy for which a Final Solution has to be found

Yes, absolutely, you can tell which way the wind is blowing.
avatar
dragonbeast: if you think that is what they are saying, you are severely delusional

also funny how you are the one shoehorning communism and politics into this all the time, and then claim we shove politics into it.

and that final solution part? for real man?
if you see it like that, get laser eye surgery because you must be seeing distorted

There is no left vs right here, if anything its authoritarian vs libertarian
Well it's odd that you guys get support from Breitbart while Anita appears on The Colbert Report then isn't it?
And feelings based justice vs evidence based justice. Stop trying to drag politics into this so you can invoke all dem political comparisons. Its too obvious.
low rated
avatar
Shadowstalker16: And feelings based justice vs evidence based justice. Stop trying to drag politics into this so you can invoke all dem political comparisons. Its too obvious.
Feminism is inherently a left-wing movement, you brought politics into your supposed crusade against corruption as soon as you decided to oust feminist critique while you were at it!
avatar
Shadowstalker16: And feelings based justice vs evidence based justice. Stop trying to drag politics into this so you can invoke all dem political comparisons. Its too obvious.
avatar
Fever_Discordia: Feminism is inherently a left-wing movement, you brought politics into your supposed crusade against corruption as soon as you decided to oust feminist critique while you were at it!
No one tried to oust feminist critique but Anita herself. Now that the tick has glued onto this ''feminist critique'' market; we have much lesser women critiquing games. And please define what the fuck this so called ''feminist critique'' is in the realm gaming.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: And feelings based justice vs evidence based justice. Stop trying to drag politics into this so you can invoke all dem political comparisons. Its too obvious.
avatar
Fever_Discordia: Feminism is inherently a left-wing movement, you brought politics into your supposed crusade against corruption as soon as you decided to oust feminist critique while you were at it!
and we are supposedly the ones with the political conspiracy theories?