So going backwards from this page...
Post 548: I still don't get how you think there will be value in a wagon analysis if you are lynched. I said it before, acting scummy means anyone is justified to vote for you. Just about any other wagon seems to me to be more valuable to analyze. For example, my wagon which seems to be composed of gut feelings that I'm scum because I've said I'm town and that dismissing Vitek's initial PM delay as nothing is talking about PMs so I'm scummy. Here's some new information (decidedly meaningless). I had not responded to Vitek's call for a PM response before he started the game anyway without hearing from me. I work second shift and start work at 2 PM Eastern time. I probably missed seeing Vitek's PM by less than an hour as I left for work. I got home after 10 and the game had started...I doubt this means anything but let the conspiracy theories commence...
I'm not so amused with Bier's voting. He doesn't really give much of a reason and its strange that he claims this as a serious vote but basically set it up like a carnie at a circus. Are you really being serious or are you just having fun, or both? Bookwyrm's defense of these antics is also interesting.
The JMich vote affair...interesting, very interesting. I'm a little surprised he came out of his shell so much on day 1. he was off my lynch radar, but I do have to say Trent has a convincing argument, but I need to read further to find where all this started.
CSPVG's comment about Sage kinda playing follow the leader and not really making any new or significant observations is interesting. The same reasoning convinced me Flub was scum in a previous game (although he had done it over more than one day). Its where my vote currently lay although it seems a number of people may be competing for me to change my vote...
Dedo's post...so I guess Trenton explained it far better. Something about this bothers me, but maybe its just the way this wagon seems to be forming so quickly. At least he decided to place a vote, if he had not, that would have been really scummy. So Yog and JMich going at each other. I kinda see what Yog is trying to say, that JMich's lurking style gives him a free pass, but I don't see how that's enough to vote on him. But then strangely, JMich comes out to vote on Book and with a sideways attack on Yog, but another thing that bothers me is this reasoning that Vitek is applying so much pressure by threatening to start the deadline clock. I mean, thinking about starting a timer is that much pressure...
So, sorry for talking to myself, but what have I learned this page...
I'm liking Trent, CSPVG and Christigale Good analysis and questions.
Yog and Dedo. Seems the same sort of arguments, but I'm just not as convinced. And strangely two players I've gone toe-to-toe with in prior games and thought them scum at the beginning. Is it their play style or is something really there.
JMich - Went from out of lynch consideration to part of the question. Something bothers me about the speed this formed...but...
Bier - Are his shenanigans meant as a distraction? It sure is consistent with trying to change the topic to save a scum buddy....
Sage - No substance, strong opinions for just gut feelings. Something does seem a little different about her play...
Krypsen - Just oblivious, but then comes out with an on point comment like this last one to Bier. That is why I'm not convinced. For now, off my radar, too many other better candidates.
Bookwyrm - sure as heck seems to be convinced this scummy act is helpful. Not sure what to make of it. If all else fails, his statements are scummy enough to warrant a lynch and may be worth a policy lynch anyway. Just like Hijack when he started, he might be worth a vote because even if wrong and he's town, eliminating him eliminates a distraction.
Hmm...so if I picked 4 scum right now...Sage, Bier, JMich and ?????...