Posted October 02, 2015
My point being that clearly GoG has not lost all the money you claim (not by a far bit) since the majority of games you claim you would have bought, would never have been here.
Frankly, regional pricing was inevitable just because of the way game companies make contracts with regional distributors. They cannot undercut their existing contracts (and will not alter them for a distant #2 or #3 member of the online market). Since these prices are negotiated on the regional level and take into account factors such as VAT and local distribution costs, they will inevitably vary. The only other option would be flat pricing at the highest price offered to any region on Steam, so the whole world could feel the pain, which wouldn't do GoG any favors either by becoming known as the most expensive site on the web to buy games...
@stg83 But would Warner Bros. be here without Lucas Arts/Disney? Did they join GoG to avoid a market competitor from gaining an advantage?
Frankly, regional pricing was inevitable just because of the way game companies make contracts with regional distributors. They cannot undercut their existing contracts (and will not alter them for a distant #2 or #3 member of the online market). Since these prices are negotiated on the regional level and take into account factors such as VAT and local distribution costs, they will inevitably vary. The only other option would be flat pricing at the highest price offered to any region on Steam, so the whole world could feel the pain, which wouldn't do GoG any favors either by becoming known as the most expensive site on the web to buy games...
@stg83 But would Warner Bros. be here without Lucas Arts/Disney? Did they join GoG to avoid a market competitor from gaining an advantage?
Post edited October 02, 2015 by RWarehall