Posted December 28, 2016
Just finished Call of Duty 3 on PS3.
What's interesting, when I first played it a few years ago I rage quit two or three missions into it because it was just too friggin' hard for me, now it was pretty much a walk in the park, not quite as much because my shooting skills on gamepad have improved over the years but rather because by now I've discovered that, like in a number of other console shooters, using the aim sight briefly snaps the crosshair to enemies, so by repeatedly pressing L1 you can easily finish off entire groups of enemies without doing much actual aiming. Having been exclusively a PC gamer most of my life this almost feels like cheating but oh well.
Anyway, I didn't have too high expectations but the game still kinda managed to disappoint me. I was curious why pretty much all my friends who had a console back in the day considered Call of Duty 3 so much worse than the earlier ones, now I can see why. The game just utterly lacks interesting locations and moments. It's as if someone had stripped the earlier CoD games of everything except the later Normandy sections which were utterly generic and all they gave in return were some ridiculous mini games. All in all it felt more like a third party clone (which it basically was) than a legitimate Call of Duty game. Still, it's far from being a bad console shooter, just very much unimpressive.
Edit:
Okay, lol, add Men of Valor. I had played it on my mom's laptop over at their place for the holidays when nobody else was home. I kept the saved game and just finished the entire thing. In all honesty, I enjoyed it more than Call of Duty 3. :P
What's interesting, when I first played it a few years ago I rage quit two or three missions into it because it was just too friggin' hard for me, now it was pretty much a walk in the park, not quite as much because my shooting skills on gamepad have improved over the years but rather because by now I've discovered that, like in a number of other console shooters, using the aim sight briefly snaps the crosshair to enemies, so by repeatedly pressing L1 you can easily finish off entire groups of enemies without doing much actual aiming. Having been exclusively a PC gamer most of my life this almost feels like cheating but oh well.
Anyway, I didn't have too high expectations but the game still kinda managed to disappoint me. I was curious why pretty much all my friends who had a console back in the day considered Call of Duty 3 so much worse than the earlier ones, now I can see why. The game just utterly lacks interesting locations and moments. It's as if someone had stripped the earlier CoD games of everything except the later Normandy sections which were utterly generic and all they gave in return were some ridiculous mini games. All in all it felt more like a third party clone (which it basically was) than a legitimate Call of Duty game. Still, it's far from being a bad console shooter, just very much unimpressive.
Edit:
Okay, lol, add Men of Valor. I had played it on my mom's laptop over at their place for the holidays when nobody else was home. I kept the saved game and just finished the entire thing. In all honesty, I enjoyed it more than Call of Duty 3. :P
Post edited December 28, 2016 by F4LL0UT