It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
agentcarr16: I don't know... I think everything on this forum goes to zero eventually.
The forums can be quite limited at times.
avatar
agentcarr16: I don't know... I think everything on this forum goes to zero eventually.
avatar
Krypsyn: The forums can be quite limited at times.
And they often end up being disjoint, or even fractal.
avatar
agentcarr16: And they often end up being disjoint, or even fractal.
Perpetually.
avatar
agentcarr16: And they often end up being disjoint, or even fractal.
avatar
Krypsyn: Perpetually.
...do I still count if I join in this pun chain periodically?
avatar
Krypsyn: Perpetually.
avatar
zeogold: ...do I still count if I join in this pun chain periodically?
Depends on if you're following the standard ordering or not.
avatar
agentcarr16: Depends on if you're following the standard ordering or not.
Just as long as he doesn't make any cardinal sins.
avatar
agentcarr16: Depends on if you're following the standard ordering or not.
avatar
Krypsyn: Just as long as he doesn't make any cardinal sins.
I'd make a joke about the axiom of choice, but then your phrase would be undefined.
avatar
agentcarr16: I'd make a joke about the axiom of choice, but then your phrase would be undefined.
That might require some nominal ontology.
avatar
agentcarr16: I'd make a joke about the axiom of choice, but then your phrase would be undefined.
avatar
Krypsyn: That might require some nominal ontology.
Uh-oh. I think that question was too complex for me. Or maybe my mind is just a bit too bounded for it.
avatar
agentcarr16: Uh-oh. I think that question was too complex for me. Or maybe my mind is just a bit too bounded for it.
I suppose it depends on the existential topology.
avatar
agentcarr16: Uh-oh. I think that question was too complex for me. Or maybe my mind is just a bit too bounded for it.
avatar
Krypsyn: I suppose it depends on the existential topology.
Smooth. Perhaps not simple, but definitely smooth. But I think you're a couple of classes ahead of me.
avatar
Krypsyn: I suppose it depends on the existential topology.
avatar
agentcarr16: Smooth. Perhaps not simple, but definitely smooth. But I think you're a couple of classes ahead of me.
you guys need to log off!
avatar
agentcarr16: Smooth. Perhaps not simple, but definitely smooth. But I think you're a couple of classes ahead of me.
That's me: continuously derivative.

(I am not sure that helps my point, but I couldn't pass that one up)

avatar
drealmer7: you guys need to log off!
Don't I need special paper for that?
Post edited January 04, 2016 by Krypsyn
avatar
agentcarr16: Smooth. Perhaps not simple, but definitely smooth. But I think you're a couple of classes ahead of me.
avatar
drealmer7: you guys need to log off!
I'd sine a petition, if you have one. This tangent of theirs is just going too far.
avatar
zeogold: I'd sine a petition, if you have one. This tangent of theirs is just going too far.
I'll cosine. I'd have my cat do it, but secant hold a pencil. (okay, that was horrible, I admit)