Hey, drealmer7, what is your stance again? I totally missed it.

lies!

Where?! *grabs a tinfoil hat*

Yay! Viking kitties!

mini-spoiler on my setup:

There will be trees. Oak trees. Lots of them. Your houses will be made of them, even! It's going to be grand living in Oakwood Village, I assure you. I hope you all decide to take up residence!

Trees? Like, the things made of wood that shed all over my car with yellow dust and green (usually) flat things? Ugh.

But, in other news... the Viking kittens have convinced me!

Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: CSPVG

aww, you're leaving no-lynch! this makes me sad!

what if I guarantee ponies?! will you vote and stay on no-lynch then?!

I put this on the back burning when Bookwyrm reported his investigation, now there is more to add to it.

Had to do a little bit of digging. I think I found what was bothering me about the flubb/hunter exchange I mentioned here

My overall impression of the exchange was flubb seemed to be twisting what Hunter said. It reminds me of what he did in the Gameshow Showdown game (CSPVG’s open setup where flubb, JMich, and I were scum). Flubb decided to go after Bookwyrm. He went after Bookwrym (and then HijacK) harder in that game than what we’ve seen here, but perhaps went too hard. It played a factor in his lynch.

(The above is what I had at when Bookwyrm reported his investigation.)

Flubb’s recent post about Bookwyrm is similar. I agree with his final point about the lack of information that Bookwyrm is willing to share. That is cause for concern. The other points deal with Bookwyrm when Bookwyrm was attempting to push CSPVG’s wagon apart from a report. Whether Bookwyrm is town or scum, claiming that Bookwyrm didn't post about CSPVG with enough conviction seems thin. Comments like this one:

Seems like an twist on the context of Bookwyrm’s question. It keeps reminding me of when flubb was scum in the past. I’m also suspicious that the comment about Bookwyrm potentially framing me was an attempt to swing me to vote for Bookwyrm.

Vote flubbucket

I think Bookwyrm is telling the truth but am also concerned he might be a bastard role. The problem is that if we go with Bookwyrm and he is insane/paranoid, we’ve shot ourselves in the foot. For the first time, I’m considering no lynch. Whether or not I’m willing to vote CSPVG may depend on Hunter’s answer to my question.

Hey, cristigale, do me a favor? Will you make sure you and your scumbuddies don't kill me Tonight? I like my role, and I'd like to make it to Day 2. kthxbai. :)

*facepalm*

"A Forum Mafia conservative is someone who stands athwart the game, yelling No-Lynch, at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it."

- "Our Mission Statement" the Conservative Mafia Quarterly.

---

You guys keep me around for golden contributions like the one above, right?

What...

Oh... also... to all you town folks: Don't investigate me either, please.

I'm not overly excited about this movie from what I've seen in trailers, was it any good (spoiler free)?


As for the game, how many pages of useless nonsense can we post!?!?!? I am not in favor of a no lynch today, it is a bad move for town IMO. For me it comes down to where do we gain more information, and I think it's lynching CSPVG. Until we know otherwise we can't assume bookwyrm is anything but sane or we will continue to run around in circles getting nowhere.

Vote CSPVG


P.S. Happy Easter to all who celebrate it!! To those who don't Happy Sunday!!

OMG, he is at L-1! I can... oh... dammit... I already voted... and my double vote day isn't for FOREVER....

or he isn't at L-1, and my memory is foggy. I truly can't be arsed to check. Someone just kill him already!

(I wuv yous CSPVG!)