supplementscene: No, I'm voting for you because your early behaviour in your wagon building seemed scummy and not analytical.
PookaMustard: Are you deliberately reading things out of context to try and build a wagon on me? What that "you're" in the post you quoted is very clear when put in its original context: anyone saying "Investigate zeogold" or whoever. How did you get from "Lift said this, so in other words it means anyone voting is..." to "Lift said this, so in other words what scene is doing is..."?
I really very much do not appreciate you twisting my words to get an easy D1 exclusion. That's just like a very scum thing to do.
supplementscene: You also seemed way more scummy when you showed up pretending not to know anything about the game way after you participated in the game. I mean you're a young guy you don't have an excuse for that fake reaction
PookaMustard: HMMMMMM... I mean the game before we all took our Christmas and New Year break was "RANDOM VOTING STAGE THE GAME" and after I returned it still was "RANDOM VOTING STAGE THE GAME" so I figured why not roll with it? Somehow that makes me seem "way more scummy", which is something I don't get........ but let's be fair, twisting my words into another context than the one presented is something I just can't get over.
Wait you put a 3rd vote and it sounded like a serious pick. How is that "RANDOM VOTING STAGE THE GAME"? This seems dishonest, Have I mistaken you making a RVSV? I could have done but I don't think I have
NOTE: I have a problem reading GOG forum because text is so small so I may miss things
trentonlf: Hello everyone! I have never played a setup like this before, but I find it very cool that even after someone is voted out they can still participate in discussions, just no voting. This should be a lot of fun! I am sad to have missed the start of the game so I could give yogs a hard time, but being so close to deadline I will just say yogs if you are scum I will hate you till the end of time because you as scum still scares the bejezzus out of me.
I have been following the game thankfully, so I will do my best not to hold things up.
supplementscene: Sorry I haven't posted I've been sick as a dog. So here's me checking in. Micro has 3 votes. Pooka put the third vote on Microfish. This strikes me as opportunistic wagon building.
VOTE POOKA
trentonlf: This was early on in the game, and rarely does any train this early have any hope of actually getting anywhere, yet you have Pooka as being opportunistic wagon building, why push something like that so early in the game, and why not say something about Bucktooth doing the same two posts later putting Pooka at 3 votes at that time too? Are you tunneling on Day 1 again?
PookaMustard: Because you're part of the Italian Mafia.
Scene is part of the.... supplement scene. What does a Cardinal have anything to do with SUPPLEMENTS?! Most heretical.
vote supplementscene trentonlf: Do you think Micro is scum or are you joking?
Microfish_1: Happy new Year
Elect Scene trentonlf: Why did you Elect Scene?
FarkyTheDog: Being stump is sounding sad. Maybe we choosing the one who is being too quiet and putting them out of their misery so they do not suffer much? Maybe or maybe not, what is being everyone's thoughts?
Vote North trentonlf: NO NO NO. You want to know what is the easiest way to give scum a victory? Handing them lynches they don't have to work for. If we remove someone like that we gain almost no information. Maybe we get lucky and they are scum, but the chances are higher that they are not.
Catventurer: The odds are that the inactive player is not on scum team. If we eliminate on the basis that they're inactive, we're doing two things that I dislike more than the inactive player even being there:
1. Scum team gets a freebie elimination.
2. It removes the moderator's ability to substitute in a replacement for the inactive person.
Although I'm really sick here, I can still rationally understand why using Day 1 to eliminate an inactive player is just all around bad. We should let the moderator decide what to do with the inactive because that's part of what the moderator does. So what's your excuse for not understanding this?
Because your vote in Post #87 for the inactive player is a worthless vote, especially this close to the Day 1 deadline. The fact that you're still pushing for everyone to go this route in Post #95 only makes you look scumtastic.
Scum Team: Microfish, FarkyTheDog, ???
trentonlf: I really like this post, and I am putting Cat in my Town slot, It will be hard for me to move her out of there as I have found her to be the most consistent Town vibe so far.
I am also concerned that Pooka and Scene are doing the Town on Town thing on Day 1 that is going to be a distraction into later Day's if that's true. I have gone over both of their posts and I am not getting any big Scum vibes from either so far.
yogsloth: Investigate microfish trentonlf: Reasons??
bucktoothgamer: Normally I would agree with this logic(no matter how newbie unfriendly it is), but in this game the fear of losing an active participant to lynch is lessened as they can still contribute to the discussion after the fact. That's not to say that some people might disappear right after they are investigated as it can happen, but with these rules I feel we can vote with our gut feelings a little bit more as those who are committed to the game the whole way through can still help out if voted off.
trentonlf: Just because someone can still participate even if lynched does not justify lynching someone anyway. That is giving scum a way out "Hey, I voted them because they can still participate even if voted out", we are still losing their vote and that is what's most important in the end.
Right now I am leaning toward FarkyTheDog, him trying to justify removing someone that has given ZERO information because it's the easiest thing to do rubs be wrong.
Investigate FarkyTheDog[\b] This is a fantastic analytical post, I do like it. The only thing that makes me suspicious is that you ask if I'm tunneling. As if you are assuming I am Town. So you either read me as Town or you are Scum and know that I am Town.
But then I ask would you do that to defend a Scumbuddy, who was Scummy. You actually took the opposite track when we were scumbuddies and bussed me. But perhaps I was way more scummy than Pooka is right now. Losing a team memeber early is not ideal though.
supplementscene: No, I'm voting for you because your early behaviour in your wagon building seemed scummy and not analytical.
PookaMustard: Are you deliberately reading things out of context to try and build a wagon on me? What that "you're" in the post you quoted is very clear when put in its original context: anyone saying "Investigate zeogold" or whoever. How did you get from "Lift said this, so in other words it means anyone voting is..." to "Lift said this, so in other words what scene is doing is..."?
I really very much do not appreciate you twisting my words to get an easy D1 exclusion. That's just like a very scum thing to do.
supplementscene: You also seemed way more scummy when you showed up pretending not to know anything about the game way after you participated in the game. I mean you're a young guy you don't have an excuse for that fake reaction
PookaMustard: HMMMMMM... I mean the game before we all took our Christmas and New Year break was "RANDOM VOTING STAGE THE GAME" and after I returned it still was "RANDOM VOTING STAGE THE GAME" so I figured why not roll with it? Somehow that makes me seem "way more scummy", which is something I don't get........ but let's be fair, twisting my words into another context than the one presented is something I just can't get over.
Wait you put a 3rd vote and it sounded like a serious pick. How is that "RANDOM VOTING STAGE THE GAME"? This seems dishonest, Have I mistaken you making a RVSV? I could have done but I don't think I have. I did make an appeal to you earlier to explain your actions and you did not.
As for 'building a wagon on you' - wasn't I your first or second vote? I thought you were Scummy, simple as that
