I've been reading a fair amount, but much of it hasn't been very noteworthy. A few back issues of Fantasy & Science Fiction Magazine, which I get from a friend in big bags every couple of years; a bunch of bundle books which, like many bundle games, are good but not great, and they fade from memory. Some of the catch:
Salvage and Demolition, by Tim Powers - Pretty good; it's an entertaining time-travel novella. I have the sense it wants to be a movie. I'd like to read his more substantive stuff.
I Travel by Night, by Robert McCammon - Everybody's got to be a vampire these days. In this case we're in New Orleans in the late 19th century, and though bitten our hero has not gone over to human blood. *sigh* I am mostly sick of vampires. This was pleasant enough, and short - a novella, really.
Diary, by Chuck Palahniuk - Chuck Palahniuk, in my experience, writes two kinds of books: fascinating ones, and ones that make you wonder who wrote this and where Chuck Palahniuk has got to. This was the first kind, about a put-upon artist struggling through her days on Waytansea Island. Kinda. It's very strange and uncomfortable, as a Palahniuk book should be.
Libriomancer, by Jim C. Hines - The first volume of the Magic Ex Libris series, it's a clever, cheeky take on the whole modern fantasy genre. The lead is a Libriomancer, a magic user who can manifest items from books (within limits), and who works with the Porters, a council of mages who keep the peace among various supernatural populations. Monsters manifest according to literary trends, in this world, and the first vampires we meet are glittery ones, of the species Sanguinarius meyerii. That's Stephanie Meyer vampires, from the Twilight series. Set in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and busting with character and references, it's a smart and interesting book, and I think I may continue with the series.
The Maze Runner, by James Dashner - I saw the movie on On-Demand, and for a YA adaptation it struck me as interesting - far better than Divergent or The Giver, not as good as Hunger Games but not that far off. So I picked up the first two books - I'm in the middle of the second one now. They're good; he's not a graceful writer, but his story works, though it's a little fetishy with violence and misery. The movie had a particularly brilliant conception of the Maze, and the changes made in putting the book on screen were huge and wisely chosen. The book didn't grab me right away, but eventually it got its hooks in.