Aturuxo: I personally find Arthur C. Clarke utterly boring...I couldn't finish
2001: A Space Odissey - and I love the film-;
Rendezvous with Rama was boring and dissapointing;
I've read through the 2001 novels (2001, 2010, 2061, 3001), and thought that
2010: Odyssey Two was superior to the first novel. Having seen 2001, the first book can be skipped, but the second one expands the universe and provides a more compelling plot. There's a sense of urgency throughout the novel that I found lacking from the first novel.
So far this year, I've read:
Childhood's End (Arthur C. Clarke)
Foundations of Paradise (Arthur C. Clarke)
Locked Doors (Blake Crouch)
Break You (Blake Crouch)
The Blake Crouch novels are a continuation of his novel
Desert Places, which are a collection of rather brutal novels. The plot involves a serial killer and his brother, and can get quite graphic in places. I first found out about Blake Crouch, through his Wayward Pines series, which is an interesting series evocative of Twin Peaks, with a rather silly twist towards the end of the first book. However, the Desert Places books make me uneasy at times because of the content. Many people die in these books, in addition the sequels would not have happened if the main character didn't make poor decisions.
Last year, I read another of his novels, called
Run. This is most likely the novel I enjoyed the most, it's a standalone novel, and I liken it to a hyper-kinetic version of Cormac McCarthy's
The Road. It's not groundbreaking, but it's enjoyable to read.