Ianis: Erm.. i said "let Stennis live" (not kill) in the part you quoted :)
I said "Kill Henselt " because of th rape of Ves , but i agree with you that Henselt is in fact a good King for the most part , one of the characters i like the most in the game ;)
so i thought killing him was like "jackass" , because it meant you lost control to Roche and got caught up in emotions , instead of realizing he's one of the best asset of the northern kingdom , a capable , efficient ruler and king with a formidable army faithful to him only and better able to defend the north in the future
for the haunted hospital , the two guys defintely have bloods on their hands , the blood of innocents , maybe i'm wrong , but i was pretty sure of it . it"s funny you believed the incense dealer , IMO he's a liar fully aware of the addictive properties of his incense that sells so well , and the guy from salamandra clearly says the recipe gives excellent fisstech .. maybe the incense dealer does not lie , but again , the "kind" decision was to close his shop and avoid more people being intoxicated (and possibly die from overdose ) by an addictive incense they did not know it was like fisstech (if you listen well when you are brought into the secret laboratory , it is fisstech according to the salamandra alchemist )
I went to the Laboratory in my every playthrough and like i said on my above post i know it is something like fisstech but like i said, it was an accidental product, not meant to be addictive, he knows about the properties and it is addictive, true but again, like i said on my above post, he doesn't force people to use it, people buy them on their own volition, they should be able to tell that the thing is addictive since they use it a lot and try to stop using it. Real jackassness is forcing him to close his shop.
And a jackassness tip: During your first conversation with Roche, when he offers his hand for a shake, choose "very funny".
callofstalker: but with self control you can drop an addiction
227: I have plenty of self-control, but I still blow all my money on candy and hookers. Myth busted.
But yeah, shutting that incense dealer down is probably the "good" thing to do since it keeps a number of potential addicts from having to break an addiction that they hadn't asked for in the first place. Thus, in accordance with OPs desired jackassedness, the incense dealer must remain open.
I've dropped quite a few bad habits, most of the people around me with serious bad habits dropped thath habits, many people drop their bad habits like taking drugs, smoking and alcohol. Myth not busted, it is only your lack of self control... Or maybe self control isn't the right expression, but i don't know which one is if this isn't, like i said, i am not a native speaker even though i am a citizen of the US.
Oh and also, about "not having them have to break an addiction they hadn't ask in the first place" Do you know anyone who is addicted to something because he/she wanted to be addicted to it? I don't and i doubt someone would like to be addicted to something. If the right thing to do is closing the shop for the people are addicted but not wanted to be addicted we should, in your example, ban the candies too because some people, like you, for instance, are addicted to it.