Posted November 23, 2009
Stuff: I finished my first SG play through about four weeks ago, took me 91 hrs over several months. REALLY enjoyed the game. The respawn was a bit tedious but helped in leveling up quickly. A few broken side quests but nothing major.
Was going to start a different SG character till I found Divine Divinity, DD turned out to be so buggy that I have returned to SG. DD, once patched, will be a great "next game" if you like SG, imho. Wait till it is patched though.
Was going to start a different SG character till I found Divine Divinity, DD turned out to be so buggy that I have returned to SG. DD, once patched, will be a great "next game" if you like SG, imho. Wait till it is patched though.
I think DD and SG are quite distinct, as in the first the plot servers more than taking you to new areas and you really have to stick with it.
One of my favorite things about the Sacred games is that you can just wander around, killing things (BTW, I *like* the respawn factor), and getting to an ever higher level and grabbing ever better loot along the way. The plot is virtually nonexistent, and you only have to do it once you want to go one difficulty level higher. (On this note, Silver, Gold and Plat are only slightly different. Niobium, on the other hand... NOW we're talking.)
DD is great because of its atmosphere and the well thought-out chars. But, indeed, it needs patching.
So, the bottom line is: IMO, both are masterpieces in their own ways and are different enough to make comparing them to each other pointless.