Posted December 09, 2018
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/48689112ea1e614b099a281ef23c76087e1a1a94bbdba2492dbd59b7ce1fa560_avm.jpg)
* First, Beamdog is a legitimate company that takes over the licenses of older Bioware games. Beamdog does do 'enhancement' work and does offer support for newer operating systems. At the same time, Beamdog does push for the removal of the original game from sale on the storefront.
* Second, much of the hate for Beamdog seems to stem from Beamdog's handling of the Baldur's Gate Series. This seems to be their first big contract and they messed it up. BG:EE had questionable content added. BGII:EE was of questionable value. BG:SoD was an unnecessary bit of fanon with tastelessly added gender politics. In general, it's best to stay away from the Beamdog versions of the Baldur's Gate Series if the originals are already in your collection.
* Third, IWD:EE and PT:EE are characteristically better Beamdog products. There are still problems/bugs with both, but they don't suffer from the same level of problematic 'enhancement' that originally earned Beamdog so much hate.
Based on what I'm seeing, Beamdog sounds like a company trying to balance both making a quick buck off the classics while providing an updated and supported product that the fan base will love. It also sounds like they don't have very good talent when it comes to that balance.
I think I will purchase NWN:EE. I already have NWN:DE in my collection and I have had issues running it. Beamdog may not be the best company, but at least having an active company supporting the product means that there is a chance that there will be more compatibility patches in the future.
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/b421b758ff48b9117483adc469ca472cdea9aaa20a7023c27c877cbf518452cf_avm.jpg)
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/48689112ea1e614b099a281ef23c76087e1a1a94bbdba2492dbd59b7ce1fa560_avm.jpg)
Basically, anyone who shitcans the one or the other gets written off by me.
Post edited December 09, 2018 by willsjohnson