Posted December 17, 2016
Lilura
Infinity & Aurora Engine Commentator
Lilura Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2014
From United States
kmonster
Nightmare
kmonster Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2008
From Germany
Posted December 17, 2016
Nice review, some comments:
Haste in the original IWD works like mass improved haste in BG2, doubling the attacks per round. The limit is 5 attacks unhasted and 10 attacks hasted (it's not capped at 5 as the manual says).
The strength raising by only one step (18/99 to 18/00 for example) is intended, not a bug. Works the same with the "draw upon holy might" spell there and at character creation in Planescape:Torment.
I guess one reason for your game being to easy was that you chose a difficulty that gave double XP allowing your party to level up too fast and gain access to powerful options not intended to be available that early.
Haste in the original IWD works like mass improved haste in BG2, doubling the attacks per round. The limit is 5 attacks unhasted and 10 attacks hasted (it's not capped at 5 as the manual says).
The strength raising by only one step (18/99 to 18/00 for example) is intended, not a bug. Works the same with the "draw upon holy might" spell there and at character creation in Planescape:Torment.
I guess one reason for your game being to easy was that you chose a difficulty that gave double XP allowing your party to level up too fast and gain access to powerful options not intended to be available that early.
Lilura
Infinity & Aurora Engine Commentator
Lilura Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2014
From United States
Posted December 18, 2016
Thanks for pointing out those two errors, kmonster. I have credited you at the end of the review.
SkeleTony
Skeptic Maximus
SkeleTony Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2009
From United States
Posted June 09, 2017
Lilura: Thanks for pointing out those two errors, kmonster. I have credited you at the end of the review.
I know this is quite old but I am going to comment anyway. In the future if you want others to read and enjoy your reviews you should refrain from excessive laziness of using initials in place of words. I can understand if you are saying "To be quite honest" the first time and plan on using the same phrase again further on you might want to write "To be quite honest ('Tbqh' in the future)" or some such but really your review is just strewn with these lazy shortening of words like "pls" instead of "please". Three freaking letters man. Come on!
I am not trying to be a grammar Nazi but this sort of laziness has become so ridiculously frequent in the last 10 years that it is alarming. Orwell wisely noted that the first thing to go when any civilized nation falls is language.
All this extreme short-cutting does is ensure that literate people do not want to read what you write. It comes off like someone just randomly bashed letters on his keyboard and posted it with the occasional real words thrown in here and there.