I am sorry to break your idols, but Gothic's controls are bad, extremely bad. Especially in the first one (never seen an inventory so difficult to use ; even Bard's Tales I inventory was easier to understand). And I find combat dull, IA poor (who among you didn't resort to "I camp from an unreachable place and cover with arrows all the fauna" in Gothic and especially Gothic II with RofT).
Anyway, since I played Mount & Blade, I find all other RPG"s combat system unrealistic and flat (The Witcher's an exception). I dream of seing a game with M&B combat and Arx Fatalis magic.
I am not even speaking of the magic system.
Yet, even though controls, combats and generally spaking gameplay is terrible, Gothic I is still a great game and Gothic II still a good game. For its story (which is far less interesing in Gothic II, but got the "hey, look, it's exactly the same place than Gothic I... but orcs everywhere now" feeling.
As for saying "Oblivion barely even qualifies as an RPG", I call that an elitist comment "my RPGs are purer than yours". Oblivion is a good RPG as well, but it plays very differently and is more heroic fantasy than hard fantasy ( Gothic being the second).
Post edited August 22, 2009 by Narwhal