Fictionvision: Regarding the scandal itself, I wasn't shocked at all that people attempt to hide being on company payrolls to shill for games. What did get me is that apparently people can throw threat of a lawsuit over an article pointing out a connection, and that alone is credible enough for the article publisher to back down. Is UK law towards journalism really that easy to use to shut people up?
Popular theory now is, spurred by the man at the center's latest words, that a large publisher like Square/Enix was actually the root of it. He seemed to hint that whats-her-name was bought and paid for by Square, which probably got them pissed off and worried about how that looks.
His latest piece was actually decent, saying people need to focus on the fact gaming news is written by publisher PR and no one else. I agree with that. I just disagree this is news or that there is any real alternative other than solely doing commentary like giantbomb does.