It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
lugum: You are just so wrong, let me tell you why, a while back ago sachys and me turned into an arguement which i won't go into details here, but he blocked me and whenever i posted something in another giveaway (also asking if i could enter) he ignored me. Yet i won here 3 times (only because i picked games noone else entered, nothing about being biased etc), despite what i feel about sachys for what happened back then (and vice versa) i will stand up for him here and you proven nothing.
I think if he has a list it only involves a few certain people that really been a pain to him and others, or having scammed.
Just take your loss and move on.
If what you say is true about you and Sachys not being in good relationship, then that is a pretty good evidence that I'm wrong that only people he likes get the games.
But the fact that I was discriminated for no good reason still remains. If Sachys don't know me and don't notice my post that doesn't mean I'm not part of this community and that I should be treated like some dirty scammer or lurker. The only time I can think of that we interacted was this little discussion.

I wasn't after diminishing Sachys' and foxwork's efforts on this giveaway, because even if my first claim was right (and if lugum is telling the truth then I'm wrong) it sure is a bitch to organize this and I respect that. I just can't keep quiet if someone is giving me a treatment I didn't deserve and Sachys did just that.

@Sachys
Except for the above mentioned treatment I really don't have anything against you.
If you can confirm what lugum said is true and admit that you were wrong about disqualifying me I offer you my 50% of virtual handshake and we can bury this discussion and move on without grudge.
avatar
Geralt_of_Rivia: Do you want some cheese with your whine?

The rules for the giveaway have been posted. They require at least one month of somewhat recent forum participation. The oldest of your messages (at least of the ones you linked) is 10 days old. Hence you don't qualify.
avatar
BranjoHello: If you were discriminated for no good reason, would you stay quiet?
To be honest, no I wouldn't.

But I don't see any discrimination here. You were measured against the same rules as everyone else.

avatar
BranjoHello: I'm active on this forums almost on daily basis since September 2013, I follow the discussions and if I don't post in some thread that means I didn't have anything to add, not that I've didn't see what's going on. There is a bunch of people from here that I interact with either through PM or Steam chat, I'm no newbie.
I usually write very little because when I think I don't have anything worthwhile, interesting, or at least funny to add to a discussion I'd rather not write anything at all. But I still never had any problems with the participation rule for this giveaway. So it's hard for me to imagine that someone who is active almost daily can't participate.

I admit that I know the forum search sucks quite a lot so I didn't use it to look for your messages. But if you really participate that much how come you could not show any message older than 10 days? By clicking on "Show more" in "Topics I've participated in" again and again you can get a very long list of your old posts. It would have been very easy for you to show messages that go back long enough to qualify you. Yet, you only showed messages that don't qualify you. We can only guess what that means...

avatar
BranjoHello: This whole thing started with me saying that luck won't help you if Sachys "disapproves of you", and now it's clear that I was right.
How come you are the only one who thinks you have been treated wrongly? If you could show Sachys or Foxworks proper forum participation per PM I'm sure they would say: "Sorry, I couldn't find that with the search. You can be in next time.". Instead of doing so you keep whining.

Keep living in your own dreamworld if you wish. I refuse to be part of it.

avatar
BranjoHello: Sachys did mention some shitlist of his, so maybe it would be good if he post it on his giveaways, that way people would know if they have a chance or not. Lack or transparency led to this situation.
More transparency can never hurt. But most people here (including me!) trust them enough to not manipulate drawings.

And lack of transparency did not lead to you accusing them of foul play. Your lack of decency did. If you think a procedure lacks transparency you ask for it instead of outright claiming fraudulent behaviour.

And if you can't understand that than any further word is wasted on you anyway.
* * * * *

Thanks to lugum et all who have tried to make it clear there is no foul play afoot.
I'll be PMing Judas and asking him to lock this thread due to the fact it has been led down the same path Ninja thread gradually went.


* * * * *

Donations via PM are still open for the next 29 hours or so from this post.

* * * * *
avatar
BranjoHello: I wasn't after diminishing Sachys' and foxwork's efforts on this giveaway, because even if my first claim was right (and if lugum is telling the truth then I'm wrong) it sure is a bitch to organize this and I respect that. I just can't keep quiet if someone is giving me a treatment I didn't deserve and Sachys did just that.
I was just watching from the sidelines until now. You do seem hellbent on diminishing our credibility in the way we're running this giveaway. Like this tid-bit for instance:

avatar
BranjoHello: If you compare the lists of winners from previous TBBBBOB giveaways you'll see what there are people that always win what they want. Also want/interested thing is pointless because on numerous occasions 2-3 people enter for a game with "want" and it still went to someone who was merely "interested" or even had it as third choice
It's a simple fact: you did not "qualify" under the rules stated in the OP. It's as simple as that. We do our best to do a "thorough" search history on every entrant. Sachys goes a step further to run through several search engines. Yes, the forum search has its shortcomings, but if someone is active enough, it becomes quite evident. I do periodic review from week to week to see if anyone who was passed over previously gets into the following week. BTW, thanks for sharing your recent post history. Just keep contributing in the general forum and I'm sure your entry will be accepted.
avatar
BranjoHello: But the fact that I was discriminated for no good reason still remains.
Nobody discrimated you.... if memory serves right, i don't recall anyone complaining about the results of random draws for those GAs.

avatar
Sachys: I'll be PMing Judas and asking him to lock this thread due to the fact it has been led down the same path Ninja thread gradually went.
best course of action :'(