Posted June 15, 2014
I really should be sleeping right now, but I've been busy and, due to Fictionvision's generosity, I also may have nightmares, so instead I'm around doing stuff like asking you people about games.
Alpha Centauri + expansion is on sale, $1.5, which is extra-cheap. It's obviously a very popular strategy/management game around here, lots of people have praised and bought it already, and I've watched a WTF video about a new 4x sci-fi game named Pandora (developed by a different company), with TB making several references and comparisons to Centauri, while also pointing how great the old one was. For the sounds of it, I should like many things about them, and the future Beyond Earth.
BUT my most recent experience with Sid Meier's games is Civ III and for the looks of it, they seem quite similar. Well, in Civ III I started great, then I realized that winning was beyond my capabilities. I don't know if it was the big amount of factors, the bad luck when spawing surrounded by deserts, how quick the other civs forged alliances against mine, or just me not paying enough attention to what was happening around. I read the manual several times to understand the hows, I tried different ways in order to achieve victory, but no matter what it always ended with the other leaders making fun of mine.
The thing is, even though I couldn't win, I somewhat enjoyed the game while playing, managing the resources, discovering and conquering other lands, defeating a few enemies... I'm no expert in these kind of games but they still attract me and I usually have fun with them. Now I guess my question is... are Centauri and Civ III similar in their playability? I'm probably gonna get Centauri anyway, but if they play the same, it'll go to the back of the backlog until I know what I did wrong in Civ. I would thank any help in that regard too.
Sorry for the way-too-many words, and excuse me if I don't respond right away but the bed is calling me. Thanks again.
Alpha Centauri + expansion is on sale, $1.5, which is extra-cheap. It's obviously a very popular strategy/management game around here, lots of people have praised and bought it already, and I've watched a WTF video about a new 4x sci-fi game named Pandora (developed by a different company), with TB making several references and comparisons to Centauri, while also pointing how great the old one was. For the sounds of it, I should like many things about them, and the future Beyond Earth.
BUT my most recent experience with Sid Meier's games is Civ III and for the looks of it, they seem quite similar. Well, in Civ III I started great, then I realized that winning was beyond my capabilities. I don't know if it was the big amount of factors, the bad luck when spawing surrounded by deserts, how quick the other civs forged alliances against mine, or just me not paying enough attention to what was happening around. I read the manual several times to understand the hows, I tried different ways in order to achieve victory, but no matter what it always ended with the other leaders making fun of mine.
The thing is, even though I couldn't win, I somewhat enjoyed the game while playing, managing the resources, discovering and conquering other lands, defeating a few enemies... I'm no expert in these kind of games but they still attract me and I usually have fun with them. Now I guess my question is... are Centauri and Civ III similar in their playability? I'm probably gonna get Centauri anyway, but if they play the same, it'll go to the back of the backlog until I know what I did wrong in Civ. I would thank any help in that regard too.
Sorry for the way-too-many words, and excuse me if I don't respond right away but the bed is calling me. Thanks again.