F1ach: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/article_45549

Seriously wtf???

It's also hard to see how the woman can seriously expect to sue Nintendo for "her son's lost future earnings" when he was a thirty year old who spent 48 hours a week sat in front of the TV playing Mario. Nintendo are understandably denying any responsibility for the death,

Bigs: From 2002?

tinyE: For our sake his death only serves to benefit the gene pool.

tinyE: It just occurred to me, starting with Kid Icarus all games are required to post a 'seizure warning' somewhere either on the packaging or in the booklet. The way I see, and I'm not a lawyer, so long as they do that, no one intending to sue for something like this has a leg to stand on.

tinyE: For our sake his death only serves to benefit the gene pool.

langurmonkey: Come on, that is a mean thing to say just because the guy has no life and then has a seizure.

tinyE: It's getting to the point I can't even make a tasteless joke in here without getting shit on by someone. What pisses me off is that I REALLY like langurmonkey and think he adds a lot to this forum. God knows if it was someone I could give two shits about it wouldn't bother me. I weep.

Anyway apart from that I was making a reference to the "Darwin Awards" most of which go to people who have died at the hands of stupidity and in a broad satirical sense gone on to prove the theory of "survival of the fittest". Either way it's meant to be laughed at, not prescribed to, like the Onion. No one gets on their ass for their crass humor.