SirPrimalform: Since the start of day 2. Anyone remember me saying something strange happened to me this morning?

SirPrimalform: The problem about claiming town jester is that it sounds very much like the falseclaim of a neutral game ending jester. There is no advantage to the town in general in lynching a jester. It satisfies my win condition, but it makes no difference to you guys. Not only that, but I do count towards the town numbers (in terms of outnumbering the mafia). "I don't die the first time I'm lynched" could still have been a lie even if you believed I was a town aligned jester, thus lynching me would still be a bad idea. I really can't think of a time when claiming jester is a good idea for a jester.

Krypsyn: I like grease a lot. It is slippery and it makes things squeak less. I don't like squeaking things, because they tend to distract me while I am trying to think. Thinking is hard enough these days...

Well, okay, as for the claims by GhostQlyph and CSPVG, I don't think they have to be mutually exclusive by any means. I put myself in the position of a moderator that has a naive cop ask to target an untargettable player. I think I might have just returned 'GhostQlyph is Town' to CSPVG as well. It just seems to be more in line with the way a naive cop is supposed to be broken and not deliver and real information.

TwilightBard: @Vitek: What I mean is the post you made when you first came in here, about Z's lynch in Day 1. It just really struck me as odd. But it's the only thing I've really got, and I've got odd from a lot of people in this game.

Vitek: So you retained your original role now?
I still hope it was only hidden part of your role (your character name would suggest it) and not something that can happen again to someone else.

Meh, I am looking at it only from town perspective where it could save us lot of time. :-)

SirPrimalform: I don't think I've returned to my original role, but rather I'm just a satisfied jester now. I think it might actually happen again to me tomorrow. I suspect that my true role has multiple personality disorder because I wasn't Andy Kaufman yesterday, but there is a link between yesterday's character and today's 'character'.

SirPrimalform: p.s. It would indeed have saved time, but there's a chance that the time might have been saved by deciding not to lynch me.

TwilightBard: Ok. I've reread Day 1 far more then I'd like to admit even under normal circumstances. I still feel like I'm missing something. I saw a lot of Ghost saying that amok had attempted to use her 'Post Restriction' as a reason for voting her and pushing her forward...EXCEPT, the only time I noticed amok even hint at voting for Ghost, it was due to the lynch the mod view people were having, while CSPVG not only voted for Ghost for that very reason, but made another vote about keeping his vote there. Did I miss other posts? I kinda feel like I have, but I'm not really sure.

@Vitek: What I mean is the post you made when you first came in here, about Z's lynch in Day 1. It just really struck me as odd. But it's the only thing I've really got, and I've got odd from a lot of people in this game.

GhostQlyph: You misinterpreted. Hugely.

He didn't vote me because of my false post restriction, he tried to manipulate my false post restriction to his own ends. Very different.

Vitek: You keep disappointing me.

SirPrimalform: CSPVG: What sort of flavour did you get upon investigating Ghost? Can you paraphrase it for us?

CSPVG: It says that I take a look around GhostQlyph's room, but that nothing is to be found. It was a waste of time. Then the PM goes on to inform me that Ghost is town.

I'm really starting to wonder if, like others have suggested, this may not just be the nature of a naive cop. That, no matter what, I'll always get an X is town result.

I know that my flip-flop on this matter doesn't do wonders for my credibility, but I feel that the only way to clear up anything would e to get a definitive reply from the moderator about one of our roles/alignments. Therefore, based on previous suspicion and an impending deadline, I feel like a need to Vote: GhostQlyph.

SirPrimalform: Yeah, that's what I was wondering. It does rather sound like you weren't able to target her and got town anyway. If neither of you are lying, then it confirms your naivete to you and Ghost's untargetability to her. Doesn't make things easier for me though...

Vitek: I am really not willing to accept that cop gets result.
The game would be messed if it would be true and I don't want to believe it is.

SirPrimalform: So you think one is lying?

Urghh... I'm going to have to vote GhostQlyph. Seems more plausibly like a scum claim. CS3PO had no reason that I can see to claim when he did other than outing Ghost.

Vitek: Yes, I do, that's why I am still voting Glyph.

It makes no sense that CSPVG would get result on untargetable and I believe him more than Glyph.

I think it can be compared to block. If he was blocked, there is little doubt he would get no result.
Both untargetable and block don't allow you to reach your target, so I think it should have the same outcome.

SirPrimalform: As I said before, it kind of depends on how his naivete works flavourwise. Did you read what he said about the flavour he got? Ghost wasn't in her cell but he still got a town read. That tells me that he could probably investigate a lampshade and conclude that it's town.