NotFrenchYet: I'm noticing more and more odd things about these two. Robb's above post asked to hear Baz's thoughts on Bard: "in other words, convince me..." (#1003). Baz posts his case, and Bard responds. Then there's the brief WOT exchange with Baron. Then, with plenty of text but no actual comment on Bard's rebuttal, Robbeasy again calls for someone to convince him (#1030). Is it possible that Robb is carefully avoiding analysing his scum-buddy too closely...?
I feel obligated to ask, especially with this going on. What are YOUR thoughts to everything I've been saying since we started up again? You've had your vote on me since before the break, and you've been oddly quiet when presented with me defending myself. You've only taken very small bits out and I know you've been reading posts. I'm pretty curious as to where you stand with what I've said.
NotFrenchYet: Also: @Bard, isn't speculating about the reasons for lack of nightkill just "muddying the water", to reanimate a phrase you used back in post #
649? I've seen this happen during a hilariously complex power-mad RL game I ran (in this case no one died in the night), and after mulling over the various possibilities, the voting continued with no further reference to the night actions. However, thinking about it now, the RL game was an open set-up, so it wasn't exactly hard to figure out what could have happened... No, I still don't think it did the players any good. They came up with vaious scenarios, but none of that discussion had any impact on the scumhunting. It just wasted five minutes.
Not really. I look at it this way, I've been able to at least remove most of my suspicions off of one person. Not 100%, but I don't see a reason to do more then keep my eye on posts the same as anyone else. (Granted, he then decided to go and request a replacement). We have a night with some concrete information that we can base some opinions on, I don't think it's muddying the water as it gives us a chance to clarify some things.
Red_Baron: Thats pretty much the whole point of a mafia game? We only have true confirmation from the dead. So yea, of course you have no actual confirmation. You have the info that I shared because it needed to be shared, whether you believe it or not is entirely up to you and only you. I'll just recommend that if your town, that you truly consider the impact if its true and take actions accordingly.
[Snip my stuff]
Its still an option none the less, and I believe you yourself just mentioned that an possible role for me could be SK, and the whole discussion about multiple mafia has appeared often in this game. I say it should be a part of the possibilities without doubt.
Well, regarding the possibility of you being an SK...it doesn't rank highly on my list. An SK stands to gain more by staying quiet then by leaving any remote possibility of being discovered. The multiple mafia...is again possible, but we really don't have any concrete information regarding that so I'm hesitant to dig more into that.
Red_Baron: Was he? I am just wondering what proof we have that he was roleblocked (maybe you could quote it?). We know that if Baz is truthful then he was roleblocked the night without kill. Let me just say that if we have a roleblock on night 1 of jef, then we also do have a lot of roleblocking going on.
Maybe it's me, but I associate things like a hit to the head as being roleblocked. Jefe mentioned in 848 that he got:
jefequeso: I got knocked over the head in an alley and woke up to find Rico dead.
And Baz mentioned in the post above that that there was a head wound there. My thoughts are he was roleblocked, since being knocked out would have to have been a player's action. Granted, I saw Baz's post but didn't catch Jefe's, but like I said, something like that made me piece together role blocking.
Red_Baron: Or it might relate to his character drinking/being drugged, as mentioned in the lynch flavor. (this one is just something I began to consider after reading it, and I don't really believe much in the idea, would seem to be a rather bastard move).
Honestly? I took the drinking as him being resigned to his fate, sort of like a last drink/whatever before being killed.
Speaking of Rod, I think I'm gonna dig through what he did. I have a theory now of how he was working and I want to see if I can dig up some evidence to prove my point or if I was just letting my imagination run away with me.
