So I bring it up, yet you use it to cast suspicion on me??! Nice logic....

Anyhoo, personally I think that gives me townie points - if I WAS mafia talking to encryptor i would make damn sure I keep up the posting quota between us!

Why shouldn't I use it against you only because you mentioned it?

Would i draw attention to Pazzer and encourage people to read back through his posts if I thought it would look bad on me? No I wouldn't.

You were discouraging from reading his posts, not encouraging.

First off, I'm gonna unvote Joe I sorta get the feeling from it that he didn't intend it to end up like that. (The whole not being on the wagon)

The thing with Pazzer, I think it interesting, I'm going to have to do the same when I get the chance.

Unfortunately, I'm going to be a few days, I'll be in and out to comment on stuff, but I'm going to be redoing my desk (cause I can't actually find a new one to purchase) so I may be distracted a bit. Sorry guys >.<

Pardon?!!!

I'll quote my post 951 here again - feel free to go back and check yourself, but what I said was this...

""Pazzer was encryptor - which means he could day-talk with one other Mafia - surely a read back through will throw up a likely suspect??""

Now please explain to me how that is discouraging people from reading his posts!!

So what are you all waiting to hear from me then?

A defence against Joes "making up the numbers in his theory?". Errm Joe, you're wrong.

Maybe you want me explaining why pazzer didn't speak to me? Ok HOW THE HELL SHOULD I KNOW, I'M NOT PAZZER. Will that do?

And I see that as several people have pointed out that "it's a bit wrong how the vocal people get targeted" we are now going to go for the quite ones.

Nice bit of hypocrisy there penut.

Vote Robeasy.

Ouch, just finished a lengthy post about Vitek's findings and their back and forth, but then Stuart comes forth. (BTW, that post was summed up as "chill guys, lets focus on the better suspects before we tear each other appart.")

So Stuart old pal. Overblown reaction. Doesn't account for the fact that he never spoke to pazzer either. Acting as though being quiet is perfectly acceptable. OMGUS vote.

Yup, I'm going to go ahead and say vote confirmed for me.

Not much of a defence there.
You're quiet because you are scared of making a slip.

I'm pretty sure Mafia is you and Twilight

vote Stuart

Joe mentoned before your post that he intends to read through pazzer's posts to find some connection to someone else. I understood your post as doubting he will find anything when mafia was able to talk via encryptor.

@stuart; it's not just about defense it's about you should post anything. Also your post is nice admitance you went into lurking to avoid being suspected. You seem to care more about avoiding attention than finding scum.

Would really like to hear Muttly thoughts about all this.

Anyhow, in the meanwhile -
@Stuart - You attack Joe and Peanut on you post but end up voting Rob? Couldn't follow that logic. Plus, why the sudden switch from TB?

@Peanut - Why did the transition from TB to Stuart taken place? Maybe I missed it but couldn't find it in any of your posts today. In the end of D3 you say you are pretty sure both Pazzer and TB are scum and now you are voting Stuart.

Oh TB's still up there, but I said it was contingent on his next post. His next post, despite levelling accusations I don't agree with, seemed very town to me as it was reasoned out and I could see where he was coming from. Stuart did just the opposite, and just surpassed him with his admitted lurking to avoid suspicion, his overreaction to being prodded by others and the info Vitek dug up in regards to Pazzer and Stuart's communication behaviour (information which also can apply to you too, good sir).

Right now I'm favouring Stuart as the next mafia, with you and TB somewhat tied for third. Obviously this can change based on how the three of you act in the next few posts. Robb is somewhat off the hook in a distant fourth as far as I'm concerned for purely meta purposes (I've been reading old GOG mafia games a lot lately. Fun reads in there).

Vote staying on Stuart, that last post was just too much.

Notice! I have not read since I posted last, for this I apologize, but I know its been a while since Ihave said anything and I felt I had to get something out there. So please forgive me if I miss an obvious question or whatnot...

So, my night was foiled at the bar. I convinced the barkeep to give me another round afterwhich I felt light headed with the intention of returning to my room for a quick rest. I am unaware if I got hammered at the bar or my drink was spiked. I apparently never remember leaving, I simply wake up in my room with a wicked hang over. There is a final detail mentioned that I think better to withold until I catch up on reading. Without saying to much it is a possible indication of flavor text for whomever did whatever to me.

So, here where my thoughts based on flavor...

1 - I am alive and there was no NK, leads me more to belive I was protected more than blocked.
2 - It wasnt particularly violent.
3 - The last person I recall seeing was the bartender.
4 - It appears I never went out to investigate my chosen target at all.
5 - I seem to be issue free this morning, no restrictions or whatnot (that I am aware of).
6 - Again, one final clue left behind I will share later when I catch up and can be sure it wont have an undesired impact.

I thought I saw someone mention something about a name claim, I am begining to think thats not a horrible idea. Possibly even a mass claim but I would think it requires some discussion first (which you may have already had and I havent read yet...again, sorry).

If anyone has a specifc question, please quote me and I can find it faster before I am back up to full speed.

Mutt, old pal, good to have you back and I'm curious to see what you think of the day's happenings.

I'm starved for posts to look over; Mafia is a great procrastinate on my work tool but only when people are more active. So chat, folks! I crave it.

Wait, questions! Everyone loves questions! Why didn't I do this before?

@Twilightbard: What are you feeling right now regarding me? Curious, as we were both pretty tied up in a shouting match. Also opinion on Stuart please.
@Itai.sharim: Why don't you lay down your top scum suspects please. You seem oddly averse to scumhunting, and prone to only reacting.
@Vitek: Any particular reason for twisting a read to get a bead on Robb? As far as I figure, twisting the case to suit a suspect is a big no no. Learned that nonsense from Sherlock Holmes. So I'm curious as to why you felt it warranted in Robb's case.
@Robbeasy: I'm probably not the best person to be asking this due to my big case vs Twilight, but why him over Itai or me? Just curious.
@Joe: Nothing in particular to ask. I'm just curious about your latest thoughts with all that has happened since your last post.
@Stuart: Who's your scumbuddy? But seriously, do you have a better case to make because I am not pleased with your case so far and it's going to get you lynched. Which is perfectly fine if you are indeed scum (which you basically have to be).

Ah, sweet sweet questions. Let's hear em, folks.

aw penut, sweet penut, I got the rubbish question. I'm tempted to think, now, that you're part of team badguy.

But yeah I'm still feeling confident; Stuart's contribution was satisfactorily unsatisfactory and I'm kind of of the opinion that this day doesn't really need to drag out much longer. come on last scum! push your vote onto your friend so that you look like town and then some town can hammer and we'll see what night brings. (Mindgames)

(I just remembered that I nicknamed someone mindgames in my sign-up board for game 8, I'll go check who that was to just make sure that that comment en parentheses can't be construed as cryptic instructions.) (Ah! It was our good friend Robert "Mindgames" Beasy! Well let me say right here that Mindgames and I aren't in secret correspondence with one another through vague monolexical commands - mindgames refers to me giving instructions to scum which they SO OBVIOUSLY can't follow OR CAN THEY??)

okay well maybe I shouldn't be so confident.
OH NO I AM CONSUMED WITH SELF DOUBT

Nah just kidding. ( :-s )