dirtyharry50: I am having a bitch of a time replying to people today, sorry. It seems to be a problem replying to a post with quotes in it.
The forums are working just frigging great since they "upgraded" them...
Here's what I was trying to reply with:
I don't disagree with you there but what I meant was I find it both odd and humorous that games with dildos are okay all things considered. I say that because in this country, there is plenty of PR risk just carrying those and whether Valve pretends to know or not would do little to negate the fallout. I am a little surprised there was no outcry over Saints Row 3 but maybe i missed it or else maybe the folks that would go crazy over the game missed it.
I haven't played Saint's Row 3, so I don't know if there was anything to be outraged about. I'll just say that since FoxNews ridiculed themselves over that Mass Effect controversy, the media seem to have been a bit reluctant to attack big mainstream games over sexual content.
However, there is a difference between selling a game that has some sexual content in it and selling a game that is all about the sexual content. In the first case, easily offended conservatives would be much more likely to blame whoever made the game (I don't remember anyone blaming the stores that sold GTA when the whole "Hot Coffee" thing happened), while in the second case they'd be much more likely to blame whoever sold it.