Posted June 02, 2011
First let me say that I do not think EA is really the devil and that they are responsible for bringing great gaming experiences to millions of people, myself included. But...
In the past few years I have seen what I perceive as a split in the video game industry into two camps.
On the one hand I see companies like CD Project or Valve (any many others). These studios create games that are huge, slightly rough around the edges, intricate, and can be played for +50 hours without becoming stale or repetitive. These seem to be companies that exists "by gamers for gamers".
On the other hand you have EA or Ubisoft (and yes I know the difference between a studio and a publisher, I will get to that at the end). These games are short, streamlined, and polished. After 15-20 hours of play you u can pay for the last third of the game though DLC or put it back on the shelf.
Personally I think both of these camps provide great gaming experiences and have a place in my library. But...
I cannot help but think of Bioware, a company that 5 years ago was clearly in the "by gamers for gamers camp". After mergering with EA, Bioware was adamantly that nothing would change in the quality of their games.
Here in 2011 we ended up with Dragon Age II (and to a lesser extend Mass Effect II). I enjoyed both of these games but I cannot help but feel that I am being nickel and dimed to death.
Want to interact with all the characters that our wonderful writers have created? F*** you, pay me. Want a different outfit? F*** you pay me. Want some fleshed out side content? F*** you pay me.
To me GoG is the high temple of the first camp. Want an RPG that will make you laugh and cry for 50+ hours? We'll sell it to you for 5.99, no activation code required.
Linking up with EA will most likely result in 20 new classics here on GoG and northing else happening past that.
But when I logged on to "the big announcement" I was slightly perturbed. EA functions like any big companies in any other industry: They want to make as much money as possible while spending as little as possible. I would prefer that type of ideology stay as far away from GoG as possible.
Would love to hear others thoughts
In the past few years I have seen what I perceive as a split in the video game industry into two camps.
On the one hand I see companies like CD Project or Valve (any many others). These studios create games that are huge, slightly rough around the edges, intricate, and can be played for +50 hours without becoming stale or repetitive. These seem to be companies that exists "by gamers for gamers".
On the other hand you have EA or Ubisoft (and yes I know the difference between a studio and a publisher, I will get to that at the end). These games are short, streamlined, and polished. After 15-20 hours of play you u can pay for the last third of the game though DLC or put it back on the shelf.
Personally I think both of these camps provide great gaming experiences and have a place in my library. But...
I cannot help but think of Bioware, a company that 5 years ago was clearly in the "by gamers for gamers camp". After mergering with EA, Bioware was adamantly that nothing would change in the quality of their games.
Here in 2011 we ended up with Dragon Age II (and to a lesser extend Mass Effect II). I enjoyed both of these games but I cannot help but feel that I am being nickel and dimed to death.
Want to interact with all the characters that our wonderful writers have created? F*** you, pay me. Want a different outfit? F*** you pay me. Want some fleshed out side content? F*** you pay me.
To me GoG is the high temple of the first camp. Want an RPG that will make you laugh and cry for 50+ hours? We'll sell it to you for 5.99, no activation code required.
Linking up with EA will most likely result in 20 new classics here on GoG and northing else happening past that.
But when I logged on to "the big announcement" I was slightly perturbed. EA functions like any big companies in any other industry: They want to make as much money as possible while spending as little as possible. I would prefer that type of ideology stay as far away from GoG as possible.
Would love to hear others thoughts