Coelocanth: Dude, you
CAN sell the game without selling the account. Technologically, nothing prevents you. It's the TOS that stops you from legally being allowed to do so,
not any kind of technological management technique. That's
not DRM.
*edit* As an edit, I'll point out these GOG games are all digital, so you can't
physically sell the games anyway. Further, you're not allowed to sell your account as per the TOS, but there's nothing technologically preventing you from doing so. No DRM.
Technologically the fact the account is separate from the games means a lot. It is an added measure which would hinder the sale of games purchased on GOG, and in the end that's all that DRM is, a hindrance. Cracks exist, there is no denying that, there is nothing stopping me from cracking games, does that mean SecuROM isn't DRM?
No there is nothing preventing me from selling my GOG account, but the fact that one
has to in order to sell the game makes it DRM.
And to your first point, no you
cannot legally sell any game you own on GOG without selling your account. You can illegally sell copies, but there is a difference.
hucklebarry: This sounds like saying all CDs have DRM because they have to be in the drive to play. Or books have DRM because you have to open them first to read. I don't think very few are as staunchly against DRM as I am and I feel very confident claiming the 4 games I purchased from GoG do NOT have DRM included. The fact that you have to obtain the files from a "store" does not mean they have DRM, else so does your hairbrush, your cereal, and your socks. The method of checkout may change, but the content you buy is free of being managed digitally, as DRM claims to do.
Put another way... you can't have a friend go into Walmart, pick up a stereo and walk out the front door with it. Then, you come in the next day and pay for it. This plan will likely have problems. You have to pay for the goods at the time of sale. Its not DRM to restrict the sale of goods to the one paying the money, as I illustrated above.
I'm thinking semantics are at play between the right to sell and your actual usage rights being digitally managed.
See, that's the thing, I'm not against DRM unless it gets in my way, which GOG's doesn't. You just can't argue that it's not.
I'm not arguing the fact that you have to purchase it first is DRM, I'm not arguing the fact that you need the files to play it is DRM, I'm not arguing that you need to click on an exe to play it is DRM, I'm arguing the fact that is registered to a non-transferable account is DRM.
It'd be like if walmart made it policy to give a person additional copies of games purchased there for free to the original owner, under the unenforced condition that they are the only one allowed to possess said games. No, nothing is stopping you from giving 20 copies of the game to your friend, no nothing is stopping you from selling them for cheap, but something is stopping you from legally selling the game to anyone.