Posted July 14, 2011
yumari: There is nothing like beating a dead horse for the 10th time, but...
It's quite simple, DRM isn't subjective, it's quite well defined. DRM restricts the use of media, hardware and software to the use intended by the publisher/manufacturer. They manage what you can and can't do with your product after you obtained it.
For example, if I buy an real book, I can read it on the couch, on the toilet or in the park, or I could burn it, or make soup of it. Nobody cares. If I buy an electronic book, they restrict me to a certain device and/or software (the book can probably only be used on a specific/unique device and only by certain software). I'm not free to use it however I want, and the publisher actively controls the *use* of it by means of DRM. (and digital laws to the crazy extend that you might actually commit a crime if you do something with it that the publisher or manufacturer did not intend for you to do with it)
Say you'd buy a T-shirt, and every time you want to wear it you would have to ring up the store to get permission, or if you wear it inside out and write on it with a magic marker, you could be prosecuted and jailed because you violated it's intended use. Think that's crazy? well that's exactly where we are now with electronic devices (kindle, xbox, ps3 etc.) software and media. And that is why DRM, and some of the new digital rights laws are 'ebil'.
Gog doesn't restrict the use of the product, after you obtain it you can do with it what you want. Maybe what you do with it is or isn't allowed by gog, but they are not enforcing those rights digitally. (again, the use of the product isn't digitally controlled in any way by gog, many games with DRM do have their use restricted, you can't just use it whenever/however you want, those other companies control the use of your product, gog doesn't)
In that sense, from what I've read here, GG isn't really using DRM either, although you could argue that running the setup is 'using the software', and you could argue that that use is restricted and monitored... I might agree with that.
P.S.
DRM isn't copyright, copyright means a publisher or manufacturer has the sole right to make copies and/or distribute those copies (and other people do not). Copyright doesn't restrict the use of your product other than that it doesn't allow you to make copies of it (sometimes you are allowed to make copies, but not distribute them).
even tho the topic is old, its good that some people are stll hammering the dumb minds of brainwashed gamers/people masses... we really have to understand this deeply, and then act in some way.. if not we just sit here and there patiently, waiting for hackers to give it for free or we dont care at all.. It's quite simple, DRM isn't subjective, it's quite well defined. DRM restricts the use of media, hardware and software to the use intended by the publisher/manufacturer. They manage what you can and can't do with your product after you obtained it.
For example, if I buy an real book, I can read it on the couch, on the toilet or in the park, or I could burn it, or make soup of it. Nobody cares. If I buy an electronic book, they restrict me to a certain device and/or software (the book can probably only be used on a specific/unique device and only by certain software). I'm not free to use it however I want, and the publisher actively controls the *use* of it by means of DRM. (and digital laws to the crazy extend that you might actually commit a crime if you do something with it that the publisher or manufacturer did not intend for you to do with it)
Say you'd buy a T-shirt, and every time you want to wear it you would have to ring up the store to get permission, or if you wear it inside out and write on it with a magic marker, you could be prosecuted and jailed because you violated it's intended use. Think that's crazy? well that's exactly where we are now with electronic devices (kindle, xbox, ps3 etc.) software and media. And that is why DRM, and some of the new digital rights laws are 'ebil'.
Gog doesn't restrict the use of the product, after you obtain it you can do with it what you want. Maybe what you do with it is or isn't allowed by gog, but they are not enforcing those rights digitally. (again, the use of the product isn't digitally controlled in any way by gog, many games with DRM do have their use restricted, you can't just use it whenever/however you want, those other companies control the use of your product, gog doesn't)
In that sense, from what I've read here, GG isn't really using DRM either, although you could argue that running the setup is 'using the software', and you could argue that that use is restricted and monitored... I might agree with that.
P.S.
DRM isn't copyright, copyright means a publisher or manufacturer has the sole right to make copies and/or distribute those copies (and other people do not). Copyright doesn't restrict the use of your product other than that it doesn't allow you to make copies of it (sometimes you are allowed to make copies, but not distribute them).
the worst thing about not caring about that, is that slowly they will consume our freedom bit by bit.