It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
chandra: The publisher requested for the games to be removed immediately but, as mentioned above, it might take a while on our side, usually between several hours up to 48 hours.
What about The Final Season? That's still listed as 'coming soon'. Will it come soon? Or is that also affected by the de-listing?
avatar
Lifthrasil: What about The Final Season? That's still listed as 'coming soon'. Will it come soon? Or is that also affected by the de-listing?
It's mentioned in the OP:
Right now we have no information about the future on The Walking Dead: The Final Season, but we will keep you up to date if we receive any news.
avatar
Alm888: I don't see any effort on this field. For example, "This War of Mine" is still at its 4.0.1 version.
Maybe you should be more accurate and tell us when you are talking about the Linux version. The Windows version got several updates and is at version 5.0.0.s3058.a7522.

Don't want to defend the devs or GOG for not updating the Linux version (and also the Mac version), but when you leave out facts in a discussion, people won't really take you serious.
Sad news, but I'm glad to get informed by GOG this time.

@GOG: Will there be a last chance sale for respective titles?
avatar
Alm888: I don't see any effort on this field. For example, "This War of Mine" is still at its 4.0.1 version.
avatar
PaterAlf: Maybe you should be more accurate and tell us when you are talking about the Linux version. The Windows version got several updates and is at version 5.0.0.s3058.a7522.

Don't want to defend the devs or GOG for not updating the Linux version (and also the Mac version), but when you leave out facts in a discussion, people won't really take you serious.
I don't care for Windows version. For all intents and purposes for me it does not exist. And right now I see that the game is outdated. And I didn't "leave out facts", whether Linux or Windows, it is irrelevant and completely tangential to the point. Besides, "This War of Mine" already had such issue (on top of still lacking modding support) for all platforms.

But GOG permits such behavior.
avatar
Marcel_Rene_Hiller: Sad news, but I'm glad to get informed by GOG this time.

@GOG: Will there be a last chance sale for respective titles?
Considering that they have been in the process of removing them for 22 hours (at least) and haven't put them on sale yet suggests that there won't be a goodbye sale. But HunchBluntley's post indicates that this removal may be temporary.
avatar
Alm888: I don't care for Windows version. For all intents and purposes for me it does not exist. And right now I see that the game is outdated. And I didn't "leave out facts", whether Linux or Windows, it is irrelevant and completely tangential to the point.
How is it irrelevant? For about 90% of the users the game isn't outdated, but up-to-date. And what should GOG do in that case. Delist the game? How would the 90% for whom the game is up-to-date benefit from it? And how would you in the end? Because if they'd completely delist it, you'd probably never get thae update.

In my eyes the only thing they could do is no longer support the Linux version (and maybe add it as an unsupported extra). And once again, how would you benefit from that?
avatar
PaterAlf: How is it irrelevant? For about 90% of the users the game isn't outdated, but up-to-date.
Gotcha! It is "Not my problem -- not my pain" approach.
Apparently, according to your logic, if the game is outdated on Windows it is a big NO, but if the exact same situation happens on Linux (or Mac, or whatever) it is totally OK and one can say it is not a denial of service.
avatar
PaterAlf: And what should GOG do in that case. Delist the game?
Yes, if it helps. Or if GOG is intended to show that "Customer-first approach" slogan is more than just a marketing BS.

Delist one and others will be wary of such misbehavior. Or GOG could include fines for delayed/missed updates regardless of the platform. Or some other way, I don't care. I want my update, as I payed my money for it.

It is GOG's problem how to enforce games' freshness.

avatar
PaterAlf: How would the 90% for whom the game is up-to-date benefit from it?
And why should I care about that "90%"? I am as much as indifferent to WIndows-users' well-being as you are willing to dismiss my situation. :)

avatar
PaterAlf: And how would you in the end? Because if they'd completely delist it, you'd probably never get thae(sic) update. In my eyes the only thing they could do is no longer support the Linux version (and maybe add it as an unsupported extra). And once again, how would you benefit from that?
I will get my money back from a refund. The same money (and the same amount 90% of yours' paid) I could give to more honest and supportive developers.
Post edited November 21, 2018 by Alm888

Post edited November 25, 2018 by Fairfox
avatar
Alm888: Gotcha! It is "Not my problem -- not my pain" approach.
Apparently, according to your logic, if the game is outdated on Windows it is a big NO, but if the exact same situation happens on Linux (or Mac, or whatever) it is totally OK and one can say it is not a denial of service.
Maybe you should look at my other posts again. I said that I won't defend them for not updating Linux and Mac version. And you are also incorrect, that outdated Windows version is a big no for me. While I'm not exactly happy when it happens, I'm also not that obsessed about updates and patches as other people around here are. In most cases the missing/delayed updates are just minor stuff (like fixing typos and very rare bugs or additional features like level editors that most people won't use anyway.

I still think developers should try to keep their games up-to-date here, but I'm also not really angry when it takes some time for them to do so.

avatar
Alm888: Yes, if it helps. Or if GOG is intended to show that "Customer-first approach" slogan is more than just a marketing BS.

Delist one and others will be wary of such misbehavior. Or GOG could include fines for delayed/missed updates regardless of the platform. Or some other way, I don't care. I want my update, as I payed my money for it.

It is GOG's problem how to enforce games' freshness.
Who tells you that they don't already have clauses about fines for developers who don't keep their games up-to-date? It certainly is something that neither GOG nor the developers/publishers would talk about.

avatar
Alm888: And why should I care about that "90%"? I am as much as indifferent to WIndows-users' well-being as you are willing to dismiss my situation. :)
So in other words you want to punish 90% of the gamers that get a perfectly well working game, just because you are not content with the version you got for your "niche" OS? How would that help you? It's more like acting like a little child: "If I can't have fun with the toy, then no one els should play with it!".

avatar
Alm888: I will get my money back from a refund. The same money (and the same amount 90% of yours' paid) I could give to more honest and supportive developers.
Just ask them. I'm pretty sure you can already get a refund and don't have to wait for the game to be delisted.
avatar
PaterAlf: Who tells you that they don't already have clauses about fines for developers who don't keep their games up-to-date? It certainly is something that neither GOG nor the developers/publishers would talk about.
As I said, I don't care what GOG will do. So far I see no results. That either means GOG does nothing, or what it does is totally insufficient. The result is the same.
avatar
PaterAlf: So in other words you want to punish 90% of the gamers that get a perfectly well working game…
"does not care == wants to punish"
Presumably, my lack of care for Windows is totally unbearable for some people. :)

L -- Logic!
avatar
PaterAlf: …just because you are not content with the version you got for your "niche" OS?
Niche. Why the emphasis?
What exactly does this word mean, in your opinion?
Something that has its place and satisfies some specific demand?
Or did you use it as an euphemism for "second-class", "unimportant", "marginal" and such?

avatar
PaterAlf: It's more like acting like a little child: "If I can't have fun with the toy, then no one els(sic) should play with it!".
Running out of arguments already?
"If the reasoning fails, just ridicule your opponent, calling her/him a little child. That should do it!" :)
avatar
PaterAlf: Just ask them. I'm pretty sure you can already get a refund and don't have to wait for the game to be delisted.
Thank you for your hints, but I know what to do and have different considerations on this matter.

Overall, I don't know why are you keeping arguing over the proven fact that "This War of Mine" is outdated on GOG and trying to persuade me that being outdated on Linux or Mac (compared to being outdated on Windows):
1) is somehow being "less outdated";
2) does not count;
3) is a false claim (because I've "kept a secret" some "very important" aspect);
4) etc.

Worse yet, I have some reservations regarding your neutrality with this game.

The point is: this is totally off the rails dispute and has nothing to do with the topic.

I suggest to stop and will do just that. ;)
avatar
Alm888: Worse yet, I have some reservations regarding your neutrality with this game.

The point is: this is totally off the rails dispute and has nothing to do with the topic.

I suggest to stop and will do just that. ;)
Yeah, let's do that.

But one last point: You doubt my neutrality, because I posted the changelog in the respective game forum???

You really seem to have no idea how things on GOG work. Changelogs on GOG aren't public, so users post them in the game fora all the time. It's just a service to people who are interested. You don't need to have any connection to the game development team to do so.
avatar
Alm888: Yes, if it helps. Or if GOG is intended to show that "Customer-first approach" slogan is more than just a marketing BS.

Delist one and others will be wary of such misbehavior. Or GOG could include fines for delayed/missed updates regardless of the platform. Or some other way, I don't care. I want my update, as I payed my money for it.

It is GOG's problem how to enforce games' freshness.
avatar
PaterAlf: Who tells you that they don't already have clauses about fines for developers who don't keep their games up-to-date? It certainly is something that neither GOG nor the developers/publishers would talk about.
They have and they do. (Just for information)
Post edited November 21, 2018 by MarkoH01
avatar
firstpastthepost: They're sending out an email about it too. That's an interesting thing. That's been a requested feature a long time now. I wonder if it'll be a new standard. That would be nice.
avatar
zlep: I'm here because I just noticed the email. Very nice feature! I hope that extra form of notification continues, and isn't just a one-off for this series.
What are you people talking about?
What email?

I never got nothing, and I just rechecked twice - nothing.

Not that I missed anything as I wasn't going to buy anything, but was I supposed to receive some email notification from GOG about this?
avatar
Alm888: I don't see any effort on this field. For example, "This War of Mine" is still at its 4.0.1 version.
GOGdb has problems reading the new site. I have This War of Mine and it's 5.0.0.